Clinical trials

This post-marketing, multi-center, prospective, single-arm, observational study will be conducted across 3 clinical sites in China and enroll no more than 50 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. After clinical site initiation, each study site was permitted to enroll up to 2 roll-in cases to allow operators to familiarize themselves with the Nordica® cryoballoon and standardize procedural techniques. A competitive enrollment method will be adopted to recruit up to 50 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The Nordica® cryoballoon will be employed for pulmonary vein isolation during the procedure. A 6-month follow-up assessment is scheduled at the following time points: the index hospitalization period (days 0-3), and post-procedure follow-up time points at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months.

This study aims to investigate whether TET2-associated clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (TET2-CHIP) can serve as a biomarker to guide precision use of colchicine in a population of clinically stable post-ACS patients receiving standard of care (SoC) therapy. Specifically, we will evaluate whether TET2-CHIP status predicts a differential response to colchicine. As a pilot study, it also aims to provide detailed data supporting design of further trial, such as sample size calculating, endpoint optimizing, etc.

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind, multicenter study design. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone and PVI combined with Bachmann bundle ablation on persistent atrial fibrillation. According to the treatment strategy, they were divided into two groups. Control group: circumferential PVI alone group (CPVI). Experimental group: CPVI combined with Bachmann bundle ablation group (CPVI-BBM).

Background. Randomized data on the optimal parenteral anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are lacking. Methods. BRIGHT-HBR is an investigator-sponsored, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin (UFH) monotherapy in HBR patients with ACS undergoing PCI. A total of 5270 HBR patients with a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) or recent stabilized ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, ≥48 hours after symptom onset) will be randomized 1:1 to bivalirudin or UFH at 70 sites in China. HBR is defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-HBR criteria. The primary composite endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days, the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or BARC types 2, 3 or 5 bleeding, and the major secondary endpoint is BARC types 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. The study is powered to demonstrate that bivalirudin is superior to UFH monotherapy for NACE in ACS patients with HRB at 30 days after PCI. Conclusions. The BRIGHT-HBR randomized trial aims to provide evidence on whether bivalirudin reduces the incidence of NACE and clinically relevant bleeding compared with UFH monotherapy in patients with ACS who are at HBR undergoing PCI.

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who have both high ischemic risk and high bleeding risk represent a challenging population following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may reduce ischemic events but increases bleeding complications.This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of an optimized PCI and antiplatelet therapy strategy in ACS patients with moderate-to-high ischemic risk and high bleeding risk. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental strategy consisting of intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of a polymer-free drug-coated stent followed by one month of DAPT and subsequent single antiplatelet therapy, or a control strategy consisting of angiography-guided implantation of contemporary drug-eluting stents followed by standard 12-month DAPT.The primary hypothesis is that the experimental strategy will reduce the incidence of net adverse clinical events, defined as a composite of ischemic and bleeding outcomes, compared with conventional PCI and prolonged DAPT. Participants will be followed for 12 months after the index procedure.

Study Purpose Coronary heart disease (CAD) is a leading global cause of death, with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) as its acute and life-threatening subtype. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) plus stent implantation is the first-line treatment for ACS, and post-PCI Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT, aspirin + P2Y₁₂ inhibitor) is core for thrombosis prevention but increases bleeding risk. Approximately 40% of ACS patients are classified as High Bleeding Risk (HBR). China lacks a unified DAPT quality control system, and the predictive value of the OPT-CAD ischemic risk score for this population remains unvalidated. This study aims to: 1) Evaluate the feasibility and influencing factors of the DAPT quality control system in HBR ACS patients post-PCI; 2) Verify the accuracy of the OPT-CAD score in predicting ischemic risk, providing evidence for personalized treatment. Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria Aged ≥18 years; Diagnosed with ACS and implanted with at least one drug-eluting stent (DES) during PCI; Meets ARC-HBR (Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk) HBR definition (1 major criterion or 2 minor criteria); Able to complete OPT-CAD scoring; Tolerates 12-month DAPT (physician assessment); Signs informed consent. Exclusion Criteria Allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or other study-related antiplatelet drugs; Severe ischemia or major bleeding during current hospitalization; Terminal illness with life expectancy \<1 year; Pregnant or planning pregnancy within 1 year; Enrolled in other ongoing clinical studies. Study Process This is a multi-center prospective cohort study (we will follow eligible patients over 12 months to collect real-world data without changing their standard care) recruiting 3,500 participants nationwide. Post-enrollment: Receive 6-12 months of standard DAPT (regimen determined by your physician); Follow-ups at 1 month (±7 days), 3 months (±14 days), 6 months (±30 days), and 12 months (±30 days) post-PCI (via phone or outpatient visit) to collect medication adherence, bleeding/ischemic events, and clinical outcomes; Confidential data collection via a secure Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. Study Endpoints Primary Endpoints Feasibility of the DAPT quality control system, inter-hospital differences in DAPT use, 6-12 month DAPT completion rate, and impact of DAPT interruption on patient outcomes; Accuracy of the OPT-CAD score in predicting ischemic risk for HBR patients. Secondary Endpoints 12-month bleeding event rates (BARC 1-5 types, including minor bleeding like puncture site bleeding and major bleeding like intracranial hemorrhage); 12-month ischemic event rates (including target lesion failure-cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization-all-cause death, ischemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, etc.); DAPT interruption rate, P2Y₁₂ inhibitor discontinuation rate (≥1 week), and aspirin discontinuation rate (≥1 week). Key Information for Participants Voluntary participation: You may withdraw anytime without penalty or loss of medical benefits; Confidential data protection: Personal information will be anonymized with a unique study ID; Free study-related assessments and follow-ups; Prompt medical care will be provided for any adverse events. For inquiries, contact the study team at the participating hospital.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), can reduce coronary artery inflammation in people with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who do not have diabetes or heart failure. Coronary inflammation will be measured using the fat attenuation index (FAI), a marker derived from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) that quantifies inflammation in the fat tissue surrounding heart arteries. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does dapagliflozin lower coronary artery inflammation as measured by FAI? * Does dapagliflozin slow the progression of coronary plaques? Researchers will compare participants who take dapagliflozin 10 mg daily plus standard therapy to those who receive standard therapy alone for 6 months. Participants will: * Undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS * Have a baseline CCTA scan at 1 month after PCI, at which point they will be randomly assigned to receive dapagliflozin or standard care alone * Have a follow-up CCTA scan at 6 months after randomization * Have blood tests at the time of PCI, at randomization, and at 6 months after randomization * Receive follow-up phone calls at 3 and 6 months after randomization

The aim of the study is to elucidate whether guiding by a novel artificial intelligence assisted mobile application can improve the clinical outcomes of patients in whom "guide wire passing through the lesion" could not be achieved within 120 min after diagnosis of STEMI, compared to conventional treatment strategies. With concerns of the inadequate use of thrombolysis in patients with STEMI in China, this study applies a new artificial intelligence assisted mobile application to guide the process of thrombolysis combined with PCI treatment, in order to accomplish the rapid coordination and cooperation of the whole medical network during re-perfusion treatment in different regions and different medical institutions in China, increases the proportion of early thrombolysis in pre-hospital setting, shortens the time from STEMI onset to reperfusion, and provides a reliable, effective and replicable new strategy for promoting and optimizing early reperfusion.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) stands as a foremost contributor to global mortality, characterized by complex pathogenesis that renders conventional "one-size-fits-all" preventive strategies inefficient. Therefore, the investigators designed a prospective, multi-center cohort study among patients hospitalized due to either confirmed or suspected CHD, which aimed to establish a holographic data set for the diagnosis and treatment of CHD and explore the impact of critical therapeutic strategies in the real world on the clinical outcomes of CHD patients, providing evidence to optimize the management pathway.

Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor after a minimum period of DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an emerging de-escalation antiplatelet strategy in recent years. However, the optimal timing for de-escalating DAPT in ACS patients undergoing PCI remains debated. The OPT-CAD score is a risk stratification tool derived from Chinese patients which has been demonstrated superior predictive capabilities for ischemic events and all-cause mortality than the GRACE score. Therefore, we hypothesize that the OPT-CAD score can be used to guide the timing of the DAPT de-escalation strategy to monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors for ACS patients, that is, low-risk patients could be de-escalated after 1 month, while high-risk patients could be de-escalated after 3 months, so as to achieve individualized antithrombotic therapy and maximize patient benefit.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers a high-resolution intravascular imaging modality to accurately assess vessel and lumen geometry and identify the hallmark of a culprit lesion including plaque disruption and thrombus. In addition, the incorporation of the MLD MAX algorithm into daily practice guides an efficient and easily-memorable workflow for optimized OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Regarding the antithrombotic therapy after revascularization, the 2023 ESC guidelines recommend the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor de-escalation (i.e. switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel) in ACS patients may be considered as an alternative strategy to the default treatment regimen in order to reduce the risk of bleeding events. Based on the above conclusions, we designed a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, exploratory study trial to evaluate whether the utility of OCT for guiding PCI with DES followed by antiplatelet de-escalation therapy could further reduce the stent-induced intimal hyperplasia of STEMI patients after stent implantation.