About this trial
This study compares the effectiveness of two adjunct therapies- photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy) (PBM) and localized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Participants receiving clear aligner therapy will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: clear aligners with PBM, clear aligners with PRP, or clear aligners alone (control group). The goal is to evaluate the efficiency, tooth movement tracking and safety.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age 18- 25 years requiring clear aligner therapy
good oral hygiene and health periodontal status
full permanent dentition (excluding third molars)
willingness to comply with clear aligner wear schedules and follow -up visits.
Disqualifiers
history of previous orthodontic treatment
Systemic diseases or conditions affecting bone metabolism
Ongoing pharmacological treatment able to influence orthodontic movement (e.g. prostaglandin inhibitors or biphosphonates)
Active periodontal disease or poor oral hygiene
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injection
Biological/Vaccinelocal submucosal injection of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) into the targeted alveolar site to evaluate its clinical effectiveness in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement
photobiomodulation (PBM) Therapy
Deviceextra-oral application of photobiomodulation (PBM) Therapy to the targeted alveolar site to evaluate its clinical effectiveness in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement
clear aligner(12-hour wear protocol)
DeviceClear aligner worn for 22-hour on the first day of each aligner stage, followed by a daily wear duration of 12-hour per day for the remaining period in combination with acceleration modalities
Clear aligner(22-hour wear protocol)
DeviceClear aligners worn for the standard conventional duration of 22-hour per day without additional acceleration interventions
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Rate of clinical tooth movement via intraoral digital scans
Quantitative measurement of cumulative linear displacement and dental crown movement (in millimeters) calculated after every 2- aligners sequence (every 4 weeks) measurement will be obtained using digital intra-oral scan superimposed across all three study groups.
Secondary outcomes
Root apex displacement
Assessment of root apex displacement in millimeters using CBCT superimposition
Patient-Reported Pain Level
Pain intensity is evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Root resorption
Assessment of root resorption in millimeters using CBCT superimposition
Peri-tooth alveolar bone density
Assessment of peri-tooth alveolar bone density changes in Hounsfield Unit (HU) using CBCT superimposition.
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: