Orthodontic Tooth Movement

This study compares the effectiveness of two adjunct therapies- photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy) (PBM) and localized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Participants receiving clear aligner therapy will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: clear aligners with PBM, clear aligners with PRP, or clear aligners alone (control group). The goal is to evaluate the efficiency, tooth movement tracking and safety.

Orthodontic treatment often requires moving the upper canine teeth (the pointed teeth) into the spaces left after removing premolar teeth. This process is usually slow and can take many months, making the total treatment time longer.This study will compare two techniques that may speed up this tooth movement: Micro-osteoperforation (MOP): A minimally invasive procedure in which a small device is used to create tiny holes in the jawbone near the canine tooth under local anesthesia. These micro-perforations stimulate the bone to remodel faster, which allows the tooth to move more quickly. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) / Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT): A painless, non-invasive technique that uses a low-power laser light applied to the gum tissue near the canine tooth. The laser energy stimulates cells in the bone and supporting tissues to accelerate tooth movement without any cutting or drilling. This trial will randomly assign eligible patients into one of three groups: MOP, LLLT, or a control group receiving standard orthodontic treatment only. Each group will contain 25 participants (75 total). The main goal is to measure and compare how fast the upper canine tooth moves in each group over the first month and until the space is fully closed. The study will also measure the effect of age and sex on the results. The findings will help orthodontists choose the best, fastest, and most comfortable method for each patient to shorten overall treatment time

Orthodontic treatment is often prolonged, requiring years to achieve desirable outcomes. The prolonged duration of treatment increases the risk of complications such as root resorption, periodontal damage, and patient non-compliance. To address these concerns, various methods have been explored to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, including pharmacological agents, mechanical vibration, corticotomies, and minimally invasive techniques like Micro-Osteoperforations (MOPs) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT). Micro-Osteoperforations (MOPs) have gained popularity as a minimally invasive technique that enhances bone remodeling by inducing a localized inflammatory response, thereby accelerating tooth movement. Studies have shown that MOPs can effectively stimulate the expression of cytokines, increasing osteoclastic activity and facilitating rapid orthodontic tooth movement. However, the extent of its effectiveness varies among individuals, necessitating additional interventions to maximize efficiency. Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), also known as photobiomodulation, is another promising adjunct in orthodontics. LLLT has been reported to enhance cellular activity, promote osteoblastic and osteoclastic function, and improve tissue healing, leading to accelerated tooth movement. Several studies suggest that LLLT alone can expedite orthodontic treatment, but its combination with MOPs has not been extensively explored. This study aims to compare the rate of orthodontic tooth movement between MOPs alone and MOPs combined with LLLT. By evaluating these two techniques, this research seeks to determine whether LLLT enhances the effectiveness of MOPs in accelerating tooth movement. The findings of this study could provide valuable insights into optimizing orthodontic treatment duration while minimizing potential risks and discomfort for patients.

Study will be directed to evaluate the dentoalveolar changes following maxillary incisor intrusion using utility arch assisted with micro-osteoperforations in deep bite cases.

study will be directed to evaluate silver-hydroxyapatite nano-coated versus uncoated orthodontic miniscrews for en masse retraction of the upper anterior segment.

This study will evaluate the effect of locally applied Calcitriol on dental and skeletal changes during upper canine retraction. It is a split-mouth randomized clinical trial, where Calcitriol will be locally applied on one side of the maxilla, and the other side will serve as control.

Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) cause cortical bone injuries and consequently increase the expression of inflammatory mediators, allowing for increased bone and periodontal ligament remodeling associated with orthodontic movement. It remains unclear the effect of orthodontic intrusion combined with MOPs application on teeth with reduced periodontium. The general objective will be to determine the efficacy of MOPs during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in terms of periodontal and orthodontic outcomes in stage IV periodontitis patients, case type 2 with pathological tooth migration (PTM), characterized the presence of at least one flared tooth of the upper-anterior sextant with an intrabony defect (intrabony component \<5mm)