Comparison of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age18+
SponsorThomas Hope

About this trial

There is evidence that Actinium-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (225Ac-PSMA) has a potentially higher level of efficacy than 177 Lutetium Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (177Lu-PSMA) as a radioligand therapy. This single center, pilot study will compare differences in the mechanisms of actinium-225 and lutetium-177 radioligand therapies (RLT) in participants with high or very high risk localized or locoregional prostate cancer planning on undergoing a prostatectomy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years.

Histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma.

Gleason score of 4+4 disease or higher, Or Gleason 4+3 with large cribriform component (defined as >0.25 mm in short diameter)

Pelvic nodal metastases on PSMA PET.

Disqualifiers

Diagnosed with other malignancies that are expected to alter life expectancy or may interfere with disease assessment. However, participants with a prior history of malignancy that has been adequately treated and who have been disease- free, treatment- free for more than 3 years prior to randomization, or participants with adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer are eligible.

Individuals with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment has the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen.

Concurrent and serious (as determined by the principal investigator) medical conditions, including, but not limited to New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, history of congenital prolonged QT syndrome, uncontrolled infection, known active hepatitis B or C or other significant co-morbid conditions that in the opinion of the investigator would impair study participation or cooperation.

Has received prior prostate cancer therapy.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • 177 Lutetium Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen 617

    Drug

    Given intravenously (IV) or intra-arterially (IA)

  • Actinium-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen 617

    Drug

    Given IV or IA

  • Non-investigational, Prostatectomy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo non-investigational surgical procedure to remove prostate.

  • Prostate Tissue Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Whole prostate tissue will be collected for correlative research at time of prostatectomy.

  • Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/Computerized tomography (CT)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Imaging procedure

  • Blood Sample Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Blood samples will be obtained for research purposes

Treatment groups

45 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Cohort 1 (177Lu-PSMA-617)Experimental treatment 5 interventions
Group B: Cohort 2 (225Ac-PSMA-617)Experimental treatment 5 interventions
Group C: Control Group (Prostatectomy only)Other 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Mean of tumor absorbed dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)

The mean tumor absorbed dose on post-treatment SPECT imaging within 7 days of the first radioligand treatment (RLT) will be obtained by using MIM Software to measure absorbed dose and researchers will manually segment activity in the dominant prostate tumor while carefully excluding any activity within the bladder using a threshold of 5 Gray. Using this segmented volume, the mean dose within the tumor in Gray for each participant and standard deviation will be calculated and reported descriptively for Cohorts 1 and 2. A two-sample t-test comparing the dose between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model to compare the dose between different treatment/fractionation modalities within each cohort will be performed.

Time frame
1 week
2

Rate of Cluster of differentiation 3 positive (CD3+) T cell infiltration

Immunohistochemistry will be performed using standard methods, and stained slides will be scanned using an automated microscope scanner. Five randomly selected fields (0.25 mm\^2) from each participant's primary tumor will be captured. Using color-specific algorithms, CD3+ cell counts will be determined, and the mean of each of the five quantified fields will be used. We will use a two-sample t-test or ANOVA model comparing the CD3+ cell counts between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 with participants who have not undergone prostatectomy enrolled in the biospecimen protocol, respectively.

Time frame
1 day, at time of prostatectomy

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of participants with reported treatment-emergent adverse events (Cohorts 1 and 2)

The proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events, as classified by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI CTCAE v5.0) will be reported for participants receiving RLT.

Time frame
Up to 6 weeks after last PSMA RLT administration
2

Proportion of participants with perioperative complications

The Clavien-Dindo classification is a widely used system for grading and classifying surgical complications. The Proportion of participants with documented perioperative complications following prostatectomy per the Clavien-Dindo classification will be reported.

Time frame
Up to 6 weeks after prostatectomy
3

Median scores on the xerostomia-quality-of-life-scale (XeQoLS)

The XeQoLS questionnaire measures the effects of salivary gland dysfunction and xerostomia on the four major domains of oral health-related quality of life: physical, pain, personal, and social. The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each rated on a 0-to-4 point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptom burden. Median scores for each domain and global score and interquartile ranges will be reported.

Time frame
Up to 12 months after prostatectomy
4

Proportion of participants with 50% decrease in level of prostate specific antigen (PSA50)

The proportion of participants who achieve a greater than 50% decline from baseline PSA drawn prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), up to the day of prostatectomy, will be descriptively reported along with 95% binomial confidence interval. It will be compared between the two treatment Cohorts using a Fischer's test.

Time frame
Up to 8 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Thomas Hope

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Sponsor institution

Novartis

Collaborator