Comparison Between Botox and Magnesium Sulfate Effect in Treatment of Myofascial Pain Trigger Points Within the Masseter Muscle

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age16-50
SponsorMisr University for Science and Technology

About this trial

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of Botulinum toxin type A, magnesium sulfate and saline injections in treatment of the masseter muscle trigger points, in patients between 16 - 50 years old with myofascial pain with masseter muscle trigger points. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* which treatment has longer effect of pain release with the least possible side effects and recurrence rate? * Which treatment has greater impact on improving patient's quality of life? Researchers will compare Botulinum toxin type A, magnesium sulfate to a placebo saline injections in treatment of the masseter muscle trigger points Participants will attend to the clinic 4 times * 1st visit will include taking preoperative records and treatment injection * 2nd visit will be follow up and taking records after 1 month * 3rd visit will be follow up and taking records after 3 months * 4th visit will be follow up and taking records after 6 months

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients diagnosed with orofacial pain and trigger points in the masseter muscle unilaterally or bilaterally for at least period 6 months other criteria

Definite diagnosis of myofascial pain based on the DC/TMD criteria with a referral

Presence of one or more unilateral or bilateral trigger points in the masseter muscle

No history of any invasive procedures of the related masseter muscle (Taşkesen, Cezairli, 2023.)

Disqualifiers

Any painful conditions (other than myofascial trigger points) affecting the orofacial region

Any systemic diseases that could affect masticatory function (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis and epilepsy

Pregnancy and lactation. (Refahee, Mahrous, Shabaan,2022)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • MgSO4

    Drug

    2ml MgSo4 (Magnesium sulfate sterile ampoule 10 ml, 100 mg/ml = 0.41 mMol/ml. Egyptian Int. Pharmaceutical Industries Co., Egypt).

  • BOTOX-A

    Drug

    2ml of BTX

  • Saline (NaCl 0,9 %) (placebo)

    Drug

    2 ml of saline

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Group I: Patients will receive Magnesium Sulfate injection into trigger pointsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Group II: Patients will receive Botulinum Toxin into trigger pointsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Group III: Patients will receive Saline injection into trigger pointsPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Evaluating pain

Pain will be recorded with a visual analog scale (VAS of 0-10, with zero being no pain and 10 the worst pain possible)

Time frame
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up

Secondary outcomes

1

Pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO)

Pain-free MMO will be measured as the distance between the incisal edges of the upper and lower incisors. Three measurements will be performed, and their average was recorded (Taşkesen, Cezairli, 2023).

Time frame
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up
2

Muscle health and activity measured using electromyography

Muscle health and activity measured using electromyography, EMG can provide valuable insights into altered muscle activity patterns and help in the diagnosis and management of MPDS through readings (Zieliński, et al, 2021).

Time frame
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up
3

The quality of life will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14)

The quality of life will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14) containing 14 questions divided into seven domains of oral health. The participant will be asked to score each question using a scale from 1 to 5 \[never (score 0); hardly ever (score 1); occasionally (score 2); fairly often (score 3); and very often (score 4)\], and the sum of all 14 items was calculated. The OHIP score could range from 0 to 56 units, with the former indicating no problems and higher scores representing greater impairment of quality of life (Slade and Spencer, 1994).

Time frame
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: