A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) Maintenance Treatment Versus Standard of Care in Participants With Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (MK-2870-022/TroFuse-022/ENGOT-ov84/GOG-3103)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC

About this trial

The main goals of this study are to learn about the safety of sacituzumab tirumotecan with bevacizumab and if people tolerate it; and if people who take sacituzumab tirumotecan with or without bevacizumab live longer without the cancer getting worse than those who receive standard of care treatment.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Has locally advanced or metastatic, histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma of certain histologies

Has received 4 or more cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in first-line and a total of 6 to 8 cycles of carboplatin-based doublet chemotherapy in second-line setting for ovarian cancer (OC)

Has platinum-sensitive epithelial OC

Has provided tissue of a tumor lesion that was not previously irradiated

Disqualifiers

Has nonepithelial cancers (germ cell tumors and sex cord-stromal tumors), low-grade serous tumors, low-grade endometrioid tumors, borderline tumors (low malignant potential), mucinous, seromucinous that is predominantly mucinous, malignant Brenner's tumor and undifferentiated carcinoma

Has platinum-resistant OC or platinum-refractory OC

Has history of documented severe dry eye syndrome, severe Meibomian gland disease and/or blepharitis, or severe corneal disease that prevents/delays corneal healing

Has active inflammatory bowel disease requiring immunosuppressive medication or previous history of inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or chronic diarrhea)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Sacituzumab tirumotecan

    Biological/Vaccine

    IV Infusion

  • Bevacizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    IV Infusion

  • H1 receptor antagonist

    Drug

    Rescue medication taken per approved product label before sacituzumab tirumotecan

  • H2 receptor antagonist

    Drug

    Rescue medication taken per approved product label before sacituzumab tirumotecan

  • Acetaminophen (or equivalent)

    Drug

    Rescue medication taken per approved product label before sacituzumab tirumotecan

  • Dexamethasone (or equivalent)

    Drug

    Rescue medication taken per approved product label before sacituzumab tirumotecan

  • Steroid mouthwash (dexamethasone or equivalent)

    Drug

    Rescue medication taken orally 2-4 times daily

Treatment groups

770 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Part 1: Sacituzumab tirumotecan + BevacizumabExperimental treatment 7 interventions
Group B: Part 2: Sacituzumab tirumotecanExperimental treatment 7 interventions
Group C: Part 2: Standard of care (SOC)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Part 1: Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention.

Time frame
Up to 6 weeks
2

Part 1: Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Intervention Due to an AE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention.

Time frame
Up to 6 weeks
3

Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) will be presented.

Time frame
Up to approximately 4 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Part 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.

Time frame
Up to approximately 6 years
2

Part 2: Number of Participants With One or More AEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention.

Time frame
Up to approximately 4 years
3

Part 2: Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Intervention Due to an AE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention.

Time frame
Up to approximately 4 years
4

Part 2: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status-Quality of Life Score

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to Item 30 (""How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") is scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better level of function. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30 score will be reported.

Time frame
Baseline and up to approximately 4 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Lead sponsor

European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT)

Collaborator

GOG Foundation

Collaborator