"Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Venovenous extracorporeaL Membrane Oxygenation for Acute respIratory Distress syndrOme"

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

About this trial

The CALMDOWN trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, comparative, controlled trial randomizing patients who received near apneic ventilation vs usual care on ECMO (ultra-protective lung ventilation).

The study goal is to investigate the benefit of early apneic ventilation in the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO.

Indeed, our hypothesis is that that early (near) apneic ventilation on venovenous ECMO for severe ARDS can enhance ventilator injury prevention and therefore reduce ECMO duration and mortality at Day 60.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome refractory to conventional therapy placed on VV-ECMO support in the 48 hours (maximum tolerance : +2h) preceding inclusion.

Obtain informed consent from a close relative or surrogate. According to the specifications of emergency inclusion, randomization without the close relative/surrogate consent could be performed if the patient is unable to give his/her consent and when the close relative/surrogate/family member are absent. Close relative/surrogate/family member consent will be asked as soon as possible after randomization. The patient will be asked as soon as possible to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.

French Social security registration (except AME)

Disqualifiers

Age < 18

Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Initiation of VV-ECMO > 48 h (maximum tolerance : +2h)

Cardiac arrest with cumulated no flow time &amp;gt;10 minutes before ECMO (within 48 hours prior to inclusion)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ECMO + near apneic ventilation

    Device

    Near apneic ventilation will be use during the first 3 days of ECMO. Patients will be ventilated in BIPAP/APRV or pressure-controlled ventilation. PEEP will be set to maintain the same mean airway pressure obtained during the standardized ventilation period pre-randomization to prevent lung derecruitment (PEEP ≥15cmH2O). If BIPAP/APRV is used, an RR of 2-4/min will be set with high pressure set at 30cmH20 for 3 sec. If pressure-controlled ventilation is selected, a respiratory rate of two sigh breaths/min with 30 cmH2O plateau pressure will be applied. Each sigh breath will be of three seconds duration. Neuromuscular blockade and sedation could be used at the discretion of the attending physician. After 3 days on ECMO, apneic ventilation could be pursued (at the physician's discretion). If not, ultra-protective lung ventilation will be applied (i.e standard of care). Prone positioning on ECMO will be left to the physicians' discretion.

  • ECMO + ultra-protective lung ventilation

    Device

    Ultra-protective lung ventilation will be used up to the ECMO weaning. This group will receive ultra-protective lung ventilation with BIPAP/APRV or VCV mode setting a PEEP \>10 cmH2O, ΔP 14-15 cmH2O, RR 15-20/min, Vt 3-4ml/kg and lowest FiO2 to maintain SpO2\>92%. The use of prone positioning during ECMO will be left at the physician's discretion.

Treatment groups

280 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention group : near apneic ventilationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard of care : ultra-protective lung ventilationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Efficacy of the application of early apneic ventilation on four components : mortality status at D60, need for lung transplantation at D60, persisting ECMO at D60, number of days alive between randomization and day 60 without ECMO

These components will be summarized in a composite, hierarchical outcome. Each patient will be compared with every other patient in the study and assigned a score (tie: 0, win: +1, loss: -1) for each pairwise comparison based on whom fared better. If one patient survived without lung transplantation or ECMO still ongoing at day 60 and the other did not, scores of +1 and -1 will be assigned, respectively. If both patients in the pairwise comparison survived without lung transplant or ECMO still ongoing at day 60, the assigned score will depend on which patient had more days free from ECMO: the patient with more days off ECMO will receive a score of +1, while the patient with fewer days will receive a score of -1. If both patients survived and had the same number of days off ECMO, or if both patients died or had a lung transplant, they will be both assigned a score of 0 for that pairwise comparison.

Time frame
Day 0 to Day 60

Secondary outcomes

1

Mortality

Efficacy of early apneic ventilation during VV-ECMO on mortality is defined as overall survival between inclusion and D60

Time frame
From Day 1 to Day 60
2

Mortality

Efficacy of early apneic ventilation during VV-ECMO on mortality is defined as overall survival between inclusion and D90

Time frame
From Day 1 to Day 90
3

Need for lung transplant

Efficacy of early apneic ventilation during VV-ECMO on the need for lung transplant is defined as lung transplant between inclusion and D60

Time frame
From Day 1 to Day 60
4

Need for lung transplant

Efficacy of early apneic ventilation during VV-ECMO on the need for a lung transplant is defined as lung transplant between inclusion and D90

Time frame
From Day 1 to Day 90

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.