Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Intramyometrial Botulinum Toxin Injection Via Hysteroscopy in Pelvic Pain Suggestive of Dysmenorrhea

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorNantes University Hospital

About this trial

The objective of the study is to evaluate the global impression of improvement at 3 months following intramyometrial botulinum toxin injections via hysteroscopy in women with severe primary dysmenorrhea who have failed first-line medical treatment, compared to intramyometrial placebo injections.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult women who are not menopausal,

Either severe primary dysmenorrhea, defined by an average pain intensity (VAS) ≥ 6/10 over the last 3 months at the inclusion visit,

Or, in cases of amenorrhea under hormonal treatment, severe chronic pelvic pain (average VAS ≥ 6/10 over the last 3 months), described as cramp-like, localized in the pelvic region, and similar to the initial dysmenorrhea pain.

Having failed optimal first-line medical treatment combining hormonal therapy and appropriate analgesics (Level I and II analgesics, and NSAIDs),

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the entire study period,

Currently breastfeeding,

Refusal to use effective contraception during the study and for 6 months after its completion,

Generalized disorders of muscular activity (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome),

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Xeomin

    Drug

    One injection will be performed via hysteroscopy under local anesthesia.

  • Placebo

    Drug

    One injection will be performed via hysteroscopy under local anesthesia.

Treatment groups

222 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Botulinum toxin type AExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Patient Global Improvement

The response (favorable versus unfavorable) to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire at 3 months following intra-myometrial injection. A response is considered favorable when the score of Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire is 1 or 2. Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire is self-assessment scale ranging from 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worsened).

Time frame
3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Average intensity of dysmenorrhea

Average intensity of dysmenorrhea evaluated using a numerical rating scale during the last menstrual cycle before injection, then at 3 and 6 months. Numerical rating scale is self-assessment scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum imaginable pain).

Time frame
6 months
2

Maximum intensity of dysmenorrhea

Maximum intensity of dysmenorrhea evaluated using a numerical rating scale during the last menstrual cycle before injection, then at 3 and 6 months. Numerical rating scale is self-assessment scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum imaginable pain).

Time frame
6 months
3

Duration of dysmenorrhea

Duration (in days) of dysmenorrhea during the last menstrual cycle before injection, then at 3 and 6 months.

Time frame
6 months
4

Average intensity of non-menstrual pelvic pain

Average intensity of non-menstrual pelvic pain evaluated using an numerical rating scale before injection, then at 1, 3, and 6 months. Numerical rating scale is self-assessment scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum imaginable pain).

Time frame
6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Nantes University Hospital

Lead sponsor

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Collaborator

Ministry of Health, France

Collaborator