About this trial
Objectives: To evaluate the non-inferiority of disitamab vedotin plus gemcitabine versus disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab in terms of the pathological complete response (pCR) rate as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
This study is designed to evaluate two parallel neoadjuvant treatment strategies followed by definitive local therapy and adjuvant treatment. Eligible patients will be assigned to either the Experimental Arm, receiving neoadjuvant Disitamab Vedotin (RC48) combined with Gemcitabine, or the Active Comparator Arm, receiving neoadjuvant RC48 combined with Toripalimab. Both neoadjuvant regimens are administered every two weeks for 3 to 6 cycles, contingent upon imaging-based tumor response. Following the neoadjuvant phase, patients from both arms will proceed to receive standard Radical Cystectomy (RC) combined with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (PLND) within four weeks of their final dose, with a trimodality therapy (TMT) bladder-sparing approach strictly restricted to a selected minority of patients. In the postoperative phase, eligible patients will receive adjuvant therapy consisting of RC48 plus Toripalimab for 6 cycles, followed by Toripalimab maintenance monotherapy for a duration of ≤ 1 year (or a maximum of 1 year).Patients post-RC require abdominopelvic/chest imaging q3-6m; non-RC patients need cystoscopy q3m and abdominopelvic/chest CT q3-6m. Follow-up staff should proactively contact patients q3m to record imaging findings and inquire about hematuria, stomal lesions, cough/chest pain, CNS symptoms, and accurately document recurrence/progression, metastasis, death with dates.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Informed Consent & Compliance: Provision of signed informed consent and ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up requirements.
Age: Age 18 to 75 years (inclusive).
Planned Surgery: Planned to undergo radical cystectomy (RC) with lymph node dissection (LND).
Clinical Stage: Clinical stage T2-T4aNxM0, as assessed by CT, MRI, or PET-CT.
Disqualifiers
Receipt of live attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to enrollment or planned receipt during the study period.
Receipt of systemic chemotherapy, or anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or HER2-targeted therapy within the past 6 months.
Known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine, disitamab vedotin, toripalimab, or any of their excipients.
Active, known, or suspected autoimmune disease.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Gemcitabine
DrugOn Day 2 of each neoadjuvant therapy cycle, a dose of 1000 mg/m² is administered via intravenous infusion. The regimen is administered every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Toripalimab
DrugOn Day 2 of each neoadjuvant therapy cycle, a dose of 3 mg/kg is administered via intravenous infusion. The regimen is administered every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Disitamab Vedotin (RC48)
DrugOn Day 1 of each neoadjuvant therapy cycle, a dose of 2 mg/kg is administered via intravenous infusion over 30-60 minutes.
Radical Cystectomy
Procedure/SurgeryPatients are scheduled to undergo radical cystectomy (RC) within 4 weeks after the last dose of neoadjuvant therapy, and the postoperative specimens will be assessed for pathological response.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Pathological Complete Response (pCR)
Defined as the absence of residual viable tumor cells (ypT0N0) in RC+PLND specimens. Assessed post-surgery. Method: A central pathology review committee performs centralized, blinded independent review of slides from all eligible patients. Sites ship de-identified slides and clinical forms to a central lab for uniform anonymization, QC, H\&E staining, and supplementary IHC if needed. All materials are fully de-identified, presented in random order without clinical data. Two senior uropathologists (associate professor level or above) read independently; consensus is final, otherwise a third senior pathologist adjudicates blindly. ypT and ypN are recorded.
Secondary outcomes
Incidence of Grade ≥3 Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) During Neoadjuvant Therapy
Defined as the proportion of patients in the safety set experiencing at least one Grade ≥3 TRAE (CTCAE v5.0) during neoadjuvant therapy. Assessed from the first cycle to 4 weeks after the last cycle, with comprehensive tests each cycle, a scheduled visit 1 week after the last dose of each cycle, and immediate evaluation upon any alert or complaint. Method: Uniform site training, structured eCRF recording of AE terms, dates, grades, relatedness, actions, outcomes. An independent Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) conducts centralized, blinded review of all Grade ≥3 events for final adjudication.
Other outcomes
Clinical Complete Response (cCR)
Defined as no clinical evidence of residual tumor in primary and regional nodes after neoadjuvant therapy, assessed hierarchically: surgical patients based on pathological pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0); non-surgical patients based on imaging CR per RECIST 1.1 (target lesions disappear, nodes \<10 mm, no new lesions). Assessed post-neoadjuvant. Method: Surgical patients use central pathology review (same as pCR); non-surgical patients use independent imaging review committee blinded to RECIST 1.1. A CEC reviews all data in blinded fashion, adjudicates cCR per hierarchy, ensuring uniformity.
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
Defined as time from neoadjuvant start to first occurrence of: ① disease progression (local/regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or definite clinical progression); ② death from any cause; ③ initiation of new anti-cancer therapy due to progression or toxicity. Censored at last known event-free assessment. Assessed at scheduled visits. Method: A central follow-up unit conducts structured symptom queries; any suspected event triggers medical evaluation. All potential event materials (imaging, records, symptom logs, death certificates) are submitted to an independent CEC for blinded adjudication of event and date, final for analysis.
Overall Survival (OS)
Defined as time from neoadjuvant start to death from any cause. Assessed at scheduled visits. Method: Central follow-up unit collects objective death documents from multiple sources. The independent CEC reviews all documents in a fully blinded manner, verifies and adjudicates the exact date of death, which serves as the final basis for OS calculation.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.