Mibc

P-EVOLVE is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional observational study in adults with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who receive perioperative treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab as part of routine clinical care. The study is designed to describe how peripheral neuropathy develops and changes during treatment and whether symptoms persist at the end of treatment. Peripheral neuropathy will be assessed using patient-reported questionnaires, standardized neurological examinations, and nerve conduction studies. The study will also assess neuropathic pain, neurotoxicity-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, and changes in taste and smell. Objective gustatory function will be evaluated using standardized Taste Strip testing. Study assessments will be performed before treatment, during the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment phases, around radical cystectomy, and at the end of treatment. Participation in the study does not determine whether treatment is started or how treatment is given. All anticancer treatment decisions remain part of routine clinical care. The study aims to improve understanding of the onset, severity, longitudinal course, and persistence of peripheral neuropathy associated with perioperative enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab and to compare patient-reported symptoms with objective neurological and neurophysiological findings.

Objectives: To evaluate the non-inferiority of disitamab vedotin plus gemcitabine versus disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab in terms of the pathological complete response (pCR) rate as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This study is designed to evaluate two parallel neoadjuvant treatment strategies followed by definitive local therapy and adjuvant treatment. Eligible patients will be assigned to either the Experimental Arm, receiving neoadjuvant Disitamab Vedotin (RC48) combined with Gemcitabine, or the Active Comparator Arm, receiving neoadjuvant RC48 combined with Toripalimab. Both neoadjuvant regimens are administered every two weeks for 3 to 6 cycles, contingent upon imaging-based tumor response. Following the neoadjuvant phase, patients from both arms will proceed to receive standard Radical Cystectomy (RC) combined with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (PLND) within four weeks of their final dose, with a trimodality therapy (TMT) bladder-sparing approach strictly restricted to a selected minority of patients. In the postoperative phase, eligible patients will receive adjuvant therapy consisting of RC48 plus Toripalimab for 6 cycles, followed by Toripalimab maintenance monotherapy for a duration of ≤ 1 year (or a maximum of 1 year).Patients post-RC require abdominopelvic/chest imaging q3-6m; non-RC patients need cystoscopy q3m and abdominopelvic/chest CT q3-6m. Follow-up staff should proactively contact patients q3m to record imaging findings and inquire about hematuria, stomal lesions, cough/chest pain, CNS symptoms, and accurately document recurrence/progression, metastasis, death with dates.

Bladder cancer is a prevalent malignancy globally, with muscle-invasive disease having a five-year survival rate below 50%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy has shown efficacy for resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, non-response to NAC can lead to delayed surgery and unnecessary toxicity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), offers functional and quantitative biomarkers that may predict NAC response early in treatment.

This was a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational cohort study, and the enrolled patients were divided into four cohorts: cohort I was patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) (pT3-4 or N+); cohort II was patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) (including low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk/very-high-risk); cohort III was patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to receive neoadjuvant therapy; and cohort IV was patients evaluated for complete response (CR) after standard trimodality therapy (TMT) treatment (i.e. patients with successful bladder preservation). Primary Objectives Cohorts I and IV: MRD score to assess the sensitivity and specificity of imaging recurrence/metastasis; Cohort II: MRD score to assess the sensitivity and specificity of tumor recurrence; Cohort III: MRD score to assess the sensitivity and specificity of tumor remnants. Secondary Objectives Cohorts I and IV: MRD score to assess the sensitivity and specificity of imaging recurrence subgroup and metastasis subgroup; Cohort II: MRD score to assess the sensitivity and specificity of different grades and stages of recurrent tumors; Cohort III: MRD scores to assess the sensitivity and specificity of different grades and stages of residual tumors.

Selective Bladder-Sparing Trial with Sasanlimab as Maintenance Treatment Based On Clinical Response To Neoadjuvant Treatment In Molecularly Categorized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients