About this trial
The purpose of this study is to compare two commonly used types of medicine for treating atrial fibrillation (also called AF), a condition that causes an irregular heart rhythm. This study is for adults who have been diagnosed with AF within the past year.
Researchers want to find out which medicine is more effective, safer, and provides a better quality of life for patients needing to control their heart rhythm.
Participants who agree to join the study will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups:
Group 1: Will receive the medicine Dronedarone.
Group 2: Will receive a standard medicine from the 'Class Ic' group (such as flecainide or propafenone).
The study will follow participants for at least 12 months. Researchers will compare how well each medicine works to prevent AF from coming back. They will also carefully track any side effects and changes in participants' quality of life during the study.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Participants who have voluntarily provided written informed consent to participate.
Adults aged 19 years or older.
Life expectancy of at least 1 year.
Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation within the past 1 year.
Disqualifiers
History of failure with prior antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Confirmed severe structural heart disease (e.g., heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [LVEF <= 40%], moderate or severe mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valve replacement, or dilated cardiomyopathy).
Diagnosis of permanent atrial fibrillation.
Severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m² or on dialysis) or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B or higher) that restricts the use of antiarrhythmic drugs.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Dronedarone
DrugDronedarone 400 mg administered orally twice daily.
flecainide
DrugAdministered orally according to standard clinical practice.
propafenone
DrugAdministered orally according to standard clinical practice.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Efficacy : Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation
Percentage of participants who experience a recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting 30 seconds or more, as documented by 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring or wearable Holter monitoring
Safety : Rate of Drug Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Percentage of participants who permanently discontinue the assigned study drug due to any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE).
Secondary outcomes
Change in Atrial Fibrillation-Specific Quality of Life (AF-QoL)
The impact of early rhythm control on quality of life will be assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Quality of Life (AF-QoL) questionnaire. This questionnaire includes items related to psychological, physical, and sexual activity. The total score is standardized to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Medication Adherence
The proportion of patients who remain on the assigned study medication will be measured. Adherence will be assessed using the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) calculation. A PDC of 80% or greater is defined as adherent.
Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Options
To assess the rates of: (a) use of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs), (b) use of medical therapy (rate control and rhythm control), (c) atrial fibrillation catheter ablation, and (d) direct current cardioversion (DCCV).
Incidence of Other Arrhythmias on Holter or Wearable Patch ECG
To compare the detection rate of other arrhythmias (e.g., Premature Atrial Contractions (PAC), Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVC), Atrioventricular (AV) Block, Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT), and Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)) documented by Holter or wearable patch ECG monitoring.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: