LINQ® Procedure vs. Conventional Medical Management for Sacroiliac Dysfunction

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21+
SponsorPainTEQ, LLC

About this trial

The objective of this clinical evaluation is to assess the safety and effectiveness of LINQ fusion procedure for treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction compared to Conservative Medical Management (CMM).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age and Body Mass Index (BMI)

Adult subjects aged ≥ 21 years at screening.

BMI ≤ 40.

Chronic SIJ-Related Pain

Disqualifiers

Pain Source Uncertainty a. Inability to confirm, in the Investigator's clinical judgment, that the subject's primary pain generator is the sacroiliac joint.

Alternative Primary Spine Pathology

Other Sacroiliac Pathology

Non-SIJ Pain Syndromes

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Bone Allograft

    Procedure/Surgery

    The LINQ system is intended for use in patients with SIJ disease by implantation of compatible implants to prepare the SIJ for allograft fusion.

  • Conventional Medical Management (CMM)

    Other intervention

    CMM Control Arm shall receive standardized, stepwise, non-surgical management for SIJ pain.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Treatment Arm (LINQ Procedure)Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional Medical Management (CMM)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Composite Success Responder Rate at Month 6

Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants Description: The primary endpoint is a single binary (Yes/No) composite responder classification per subject at Month 6. A subject is classified as a composite success responder ONLY if ALL three of the following criteria are met: Pain Improvement: Reduction in SIJ pain VAS score of ≥20 mm from baseline to Month 6 (VAS measured on 0-100 mm scale). Safety: Absence of any device-related or procedure-related SAEs through Month 6 (Day 180). Surgical Reintervention: No surgical reintervention for SIJ fusion through Month 6 (Day 180), including device removal (complete or partial), device revision or replacement, or reoperation at the index SIJ. Subjects meeting all three components are classified as responders; the outcome is reported as the percentage (%) of participants classified as responders.

Time frame
Month 6

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of Participants Achieving Both a ≥20 mm Reduction in SIJ Pain VAS and a ≥15 Point Reduction in ODI

Composite responder analysis based on two validated patient-reported outcomes. Pain intensity is measured using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored by 0 mm ("no pain") and 100 mm ("worst imaginable pain"); higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Disability is measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing low back pain-related disability across domains of daily living, scored 0-100; higher scores indicate greater disability. A participant is classified as a responder if they achieve BOTH a reduction of ≥20 mm from baseline in sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain VAS AND a reduction of ≥15 points from baseline in ODI. The proportion of responders will be reported and a higher proportion indicates greater clinical improvement.

Time frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
2

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a patient-reported measure of pain intensity assessed using a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by 0 mm ("no pain") and 100 mm ("worst imaginable pain"). Scores range from 0 to 100 mm, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Change from baseline in VAS score and proportion of participants achieving a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain intensity will be assessed. MCID is defined as a reduction of ≥20 mm from baseline on the 0-100 mm scale. Higher proportions indicate greater clinical improvement.

Time frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24.
3

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire assessing disability related to low back pain across 10 domains of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Change from baseline in ODI score and proportion of participants achieving a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in disability will be assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). MCID is defined as a reduction of ≥15 points from baseline on the 0-100 scale. Higher proportions indicate greater clinical improvement.

Time frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
4

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29+2)

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile v2.1 + 2 (PROMIS-29+2) assesses multiple health domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles, pain interference, and cognitive function. Domain scores are reported as T-scores standardized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population, with a typical range of approximately 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate more of the domain being measured (e.g., worse symptoms for anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, and cognitive concerns; and better functioning for physical function and social participation). Change from baseline in T-scores will be evaluated.

Time frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Other outcomes

1

Characterization of Procedure Details and Healthcare Utilization

Supportive data will be collected to characterize the index procedure and subsequent healthcare utilization. Procedure details include procedure time, anesthesia type, fluoroscopy time, and technical success. Healthcare utilization includes pain-related medication use, injections, additional interventions or reoperations, and pain-related healthcare visits from baseline through study completion. Data will be summarized descriptively.

Time frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.