Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Sacroiliac joint pain is contributor to chronic low back pain, accounting for 15-30% of cases. It is a synovial and syndesmotic articulation plays a role in load transfer between spine and lower extremities. Its limited mobility, strong ligaments makes it susceptible to pain generation in cases of inflammation and degeneration. The innervation of the SIJ is derived from the dorsal sacral rami (S1-S3), with contributions from L4-L5 dorsal rami. This explains the variability in pain distribution. Patients present with low back pain that may radiate to buttock, groin, or posterior thigh. The diagnosis of SIJ pain relies on diagnostic blocks. At least 70-75% pain relief following intra-articular injection . However, diagnostic blocks have limitations, including false-positive rates and variability in technique . Management for SIJ pain include conservative, interventional, and surgical approaches. Conservative treatment consists of physical therapy, NSAIDs, and activity modification.While a significant proportion progress to interventional therapies due to persistent pain . RFA is as an effective minimally invasive treatment. Monopolar RFA was initially used; however, its efficacy was limited by small lesion size and anatomical variability . Bipolar radiofrequency were developed, allowing the creation of larger and continuous lesions. This has been associated with improved outcomes . Cooled radiofrequency represents an advancement in RFA . By internally cooling the electrode, CRF prevents tissue charring allowing for greater energy delivery, resulting larger lesions. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated that CRF provides significant pain relief at 6 and 12 months .

The objective of this clinical evaluation is to assess the safety and effectiveness of LINQ fusion procedure for treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction compared to Conservative Medical Management (CMM).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the real-world performance, safety and efficacy of the TRAQ System.

This study aims to investigate the difference between integrating lumbopelvic cognitive movement control training versus core stabilization exercises to the conventional physiotherapy program on pain, function, lumbopelvic stability, functional load transfer, and postural control in patients suffering from SIJ pain. The main question it aims to answer is: What are the effects of adding lumbopelvic movement control training versus core stabilization exercises to the conventional physiotherapy program in treating patients with SIJ pain? Researchers will compare adding lumbopelvic movement control training versus core stabilization exercises to the conventional physiotherapy program to investigate its effectiveness in treatment of SIJ pain Participants will: 1. receive the intervention as follows: * Group (A) - Control Group: will receive conventional physiotherapy program (US and MET) * Group (B) - Core Stability Exercises Group: will receive conventional US, MET, and core stability ex's * Group (C) - Lumbopelvic cognitive movement control training Group: will receive conventional US, MET, and cognitive movement control training. 2. receive the training protocol 3 times a week for 8 weeks according to the set schedules. 3. perform a home exercise program in the same dose of repetitions and time as in the session. 4. be assessed before and after the intervention and training period to address the outcome measures.

This study aims to investigate the combined use of corticosteroid injections and ESWT for SIJ pain.