Postoperative Pain and Swelling After Flap vsFlapless Technique For Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-45
SponsorWatim Medical & Dental College

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluates postoperative pain and facial swelling following surgical removal of partially impacted mandibular third molars using flap versus flapless techniques. The aim is to determine which method results in lower postoperative morbidity on the second postoperative day.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18-45 years

Either gender

Partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molar confirmed clinically and radiographically

Second episode of pericoronitis

Disqualifiers

HIV or HBV infection

Diabetes or other metabolic disorders

Bleeding disorders including von Willebrand disease, thalassemia, hemophilia, thrombocytosis, or thrombocytopenia

Periapical infection or acute pericoronitis at time of surgery

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • flap technqiue for mandibular third molar extraction Arm A

    Procedure/Surgery

    Surgical extraction performed using a mucoperiosteal flap. A Ward's or modified Ward's incision is placed with a No. 15 blade. The flap is elevated to expose bone, followed by bone guttering with a straight fissure bur under saline irrigation. Tooth sectioning is carried out and fragments are removed. The socket is irrigated with saline and the flap is repositioned and sutured with 3-0 black braided silk.

  • flapless technquie arm b

    Procedure/Surgery

    Surgical extraction of partially impacted mandibular third molar without raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Only minimal gingival reflection is performed using a periosteal elevator. Bone guttering and tooth sectioning are carried out using a bur under saline irrigation. Tooth fragments are removed. The socket is irrigated with saline and 0.2% chlorhexidine. No sutures are placed, and the site is allowed to heal by secondary intention

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: flap technqiueExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: flapless technquieExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

postoperative pain score

Pain will be assessed on the 2nd postoperative day using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain. Patients will be instructed to rate their pain by marking a score on the 10-point VAS.

Time frame
2nd postoperative day
2

facial swelling measurement

Measurements will be recorded in millimeters as: A = Gonion-Tragus B = Gonion-Outer canthus C = Gonion-Ala D = Gonion-Angle of mouth E = Gonion-Pogonion Total swelling = A + B + C + D + E. This method is described in the Operational Definition section of your synopsis.

Time frame
2nd postoperative day

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.