Preoperative Short-Course Radiation Therapy With PROtons Compared to Photons In High-Risk RECTal Cancer (PRORECT)

ConditionRectal Cancer
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAlexander Valdman

About this trial

To investigate a potential toxicity benefit of preoperative radiation therapy with protons compared to conventional photon beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Biopsy-proven, newly diagnosed primary rectal adenocarcinoma, i.e. with the lowest part of the tumour less than 16 cm from the anal verge detected using a rigid rectoscope.

Clinical stage (c) T4b, i.e. infiltration of an adjacent organ or structure like the prostate, urinary bladder, uterus, sacrum, pelvic floor or side-wall (according to TNM version 8).

cT4a, i.e. peritoneal involvement.

Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI+).

Disqualifiers

Extensive growth into cranial part of the sacrum (above S3) or the lumbosacral nerve roots indicating that surgery will never be possible even if substantial tumour down-sizing is seen.

Presence of metastatic disease or recurrent rectal tumour. Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis coli (FAP), Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), active Crohn's disease or active ulcerative Colitis.

Concomitant malignancies, except for adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Subjects with prior malignancies must be disease-free for at least 5 years.

Known DPD deficiency.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Radiation therapy

    Radiation

    5 x 5 Gy external radiation therapy

Treatment groups

254 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Proton therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Photon therapyActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of acute grade 2-5 gastrointestinal toxicity

The incidence of acute preoperative grade 2-5 gastrointestinal toxicity according to CTCAE v5.0 associated with proton vs. photon radiotherapy

Time frame
From start of radiotherapy to planned start of the third (3) CAPOX cycle (week 9-10 of the trial)

Secondary outcomes

1

Incidence of grade >2 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity

The incidence of grade \>2 hematologic (blood count, febrile neutropenia) and non-hematologic toxicity (general, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, skin) associated with protocol treatment, assessed by CTCAE v5.0 in the preoperative period, the postoperative period, and overall. Patient reported side-effects will be assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire, the QLQ-C30, version 3. The QLQ-C30 will be supplemented with the disease specific module (rectal-cancer) QLQ-CR29. During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range.

Time frame
Baseline up to five years after treatment
2

Differences in patient reported outcomes (PRO)

Differences in patient reported outcomes (PRO) between treatment arms in the preoperative period, the postoperative period, and overall

Time frame
Baseline, Day 1-5, 2 and 3 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months
3

Proportion of patients being able to undergo full dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Differences between treatment arms in proportion of patients being able to undergo full dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy i.e. at least 4 cycles of CAPOX or 6 cycles of FOLFOX

Time frame
From week 3 until week 20 of the trial
4

Tumour regression grading (mrTRG)

Radiological assessment and comparison of tumour regression grading (mrTRG) between treatment arms

Time frame
Baseline to response evaluation week 16-17 of the trial

Other outcomes

1

Disease free survival

Disease free survival after proton vs. photon treatment

Time frame
Time from randomization until first recurrence, local/regional/systemic or death
2

Overall survival

Overall survival after proton vs. photon treatment

Time frame
Time from randomization until death
3

Quality of Life (QLQ-C30)

Quality of life after proton vs. photon treatment (QLQ-C30)

Time frame
Baseline, 3 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months
4

Difference in postoperative complications

Difference in postoperative complications between study arms measured by LARS score

Time frame
From week 17-20 of the trial up to 5 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Alexander Valdman

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital

Sponsor institution