Proof of Concept to Assess the Feasibility of a Decentralised Pathway Coordinated by the Advanced Practice Nurse for Patients Receiving Oral Treatment for Cancer or Malignant Haemopathy (ACCELER PLATFORM)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorInstitut Claudius Regaud

About this trial

This is an open-label, single-centre, category 2 "Jardé Law" proof-of-concept study designed to demonstrate the feasibility of a decentralised care pathway for patients with cancer or haematological malignancies receiving oral treatment.

The study will be conducted on a population of 33 patients.

In current practice, patients with certain solid cancers or haematological malignancies may be prescribed oral chemotherapy on a retroceded basis. In these cases, the oncologist (coordinating investigator) sees the patient for a consultation every 3 cycles to prescribe/renew the treatment for approximately 3 months. Every month, the patient returns to the centre to have the treatment dispensed by the hospital pharmacy. No medical consultation is associated with this visit.

In this study, it is proposed to decentralise the delivery of treatment to these patients by introducing two visits to the patient's home by a service-providing nurse.

The decentralised patient pathway will be organised and monitored by the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) at the investigating centre, who will be responsible in particular for coordination with the service-providing nurse and the hospital pharmacy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient over 18.

A patient with solid cancer or haematological malignancy receiving oral retroceded therapy as part of standard management.

Patient with a performance index (ECOG): 0-2.

Patient contactable by telephone for follow-up by the Advanced Practice Nurse.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or breast-feeding patient.

Any psychological, family, geographical or social condition which, in the judgement of the oncologist, could potentially prevent the collection of informed consent or hinder compliance with the study protocol.

Patients deprived of their liberty by administrative or legal decision, or patients under guardianship.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Decentralised Pathway Coordinated by the Advanced Practice Nurse

    Other intervention

    For each patient enrolled in the study: a decentralised treatment delivery route will be organised. To achieve this, two visits will be planned by the investigating centre's Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) and carried out at the patient's home by a service-providing nurse. During these visits, the APN will take the patient's vital signs before handing over the treatment. In addition, for the purposes of the study, during the 2nd visit the patient will be asked to complete a satisfaction questionnaire.

Treatment groups

33 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Patients with solid cancer or haematological malignancies and requiring oral chemotherapyOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The primary endpoint was defined as the feasibility of decentralisation.

Feasibility is a composite criterion, defined according to two dimensions: exhaustive collection of clinical data and logistical feasibility. For a patient, decentralisation will be considered feasible if success is observed for both dimensions.

Time frame
7 months for each patient

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient adherence to decentralised management.

This will be measured by the acceptance rate of trial participants compared with the number of proposals made.

Time frame
7 months for each patient
2

Patient satisfaction with decentralised management.

This will be evaluated according to different components using a likert scale. Patients will be asked 10 questions to assess their satisfaction. There will be 5 possible answers ranging from 'completely agree' to 'completely disagree'.

Time frame
7 months for each patient
3

Time taken to collect data from home to site.

This will be defined as the time between the date of the home visit and the date on which the data is 'uploaded' into the investigating centre's computerised patient record.

Time frame
7 months for each patient
4

The rate of patients for whom the data interface well with the site's electronic patient record.

This is defined as the ratio of the number of patients for whom the data has been 'uploaded' into the electronic patient record to the total number of patients.

Time frame
7 months for each patient

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.