Solid Cancer

This study is an open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, non-randomized phase I clinical study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic characteristics and preliminary efficacy of SI-B036 bispecific antibody injection in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urological tumors and other solid tumors.

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of R-DXd therapy in participants with ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.

This is an open-label, single-centre, category 2 "Jardé Law" proof-of-concept study designed to demonstrate the feasibility of a decentralised care pathway for patients with cancer or haematological malignancies receiving oral treatment. The study will be conducted on a population of 33 patients. In current practice, patients with certain solid cancers or haematological malignancies may be prescribed oral chemotherapy on a retroceded basis. In these cases, the oncologist (coordinating investigator) sees the patient for a consultation every 3 cycles to prescribe/renew the treatment for approximately 3 months. Every month, the patient returns to the centre to have the treatment dispensed by the hospital pharmacy. No medical consultation is associated with this visit. In this study, it is proposed to decentralise the delivery of treatment to these patients by introducing two visits to the patient's home by a service-providing nurse. The decentralised patient pathway will be organised and monitored by the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) at the investigating centre, who will be responsible in particular for coordination with the service-providing nurse and the hospital pharmacy.

This is a single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, expansion, and persistence of TC-G203 in patients with GPC3-positive recurrent or metastatic solid tumors who have progressed after prior therapies. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), with a secondary aim to assess preliminary clinical efficacy in solid tumors.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of PRaG-1 in improving CD8+ lymphocytopenia in patients with solid tumors who are tumor-free for more than six months after completing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. It will also assess the safety of PRaG-1 Cordycepin in these patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does PRaG-1 increase CD8+ lymphocyte counts by more than 25% in this patient population? Does the effect of PRaG-1 maintain when treatment is discontinued? What are the safety and tolerability profiles of PRaG-1 during and after the treatment period? Participants will receive open-label PRaG-1 (one tablet in the morning and one in the evening) for 14 days, and those who show a response (CD8+ lymphocytes increase by more than 25%) will enter a 14-day randomized withdrawal period, where they will be assigned to continue PRaG-1 or switch to a placebo. Throughout the study, participants will: Have their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations tested at baseline and on Days 7 and 14 Undergo safety monitoring for adverse events according to CTCAE 5.0 criteria Provide information on their quality of life during the treatment period Researchers will compare the outcomes of those who continue PRaG-1 to those who receive a placebo to determine if the observed improvement in CD8+ lymphocytes is sustained, which would indicate that the drug is effective in maintaining immune response.

The aim of this clinical study is to learn more about the effects of urolithin A (MitoPure®) on the immune system of cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies. Any effects will be compared with patients who take a placebo instead of urolithin A (MitoPure®).

This is a Phase I clinical trial testing the safety and effectiveness of AK138D1in patients with advanced cancer. The study will enroll up to 200 patients with various types of advanced solid tumors who haven't responded to standard treatments. Patients will receive AK138D1 to determine the safest dose and evaluate if the drug can help treat their cancer.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a combination treatment using PRaG-1 Cordycepin Tablets with radiation therapy, immune-boosting injections, and immunotherapy drugs can help patients with advanced solid tumors. It will also assess safety. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does this treatment improve immune function and slow tumor growth? What side effects or risks occur during treatment? Participants will: Take PRaG-1 Cordycepin Tablets (a natural compound derived from Cordyceps fungus) orally: higher dose for 7 days before radiation, then lower daily dose for 2 weeks Receive targeted radiation therapy to the tumor area (5-12 Gy total in 2-3 sessions) Get daily immune-boosting injections (GM-CSF) for 7 days starting with radiation Receive immunotherapy drugs (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) within one week after radiation Have blood drawn and small tumor tissue samples taken before and after the first two treatment cycles for immune analysis All participants will receive this combination treatment; there is no placebo or alternative treatment group in this study.

In this study, the drug capecitabine is investigated. Capecitabine is commonly used to treat breast, colon, and stomach cancers. Capecitabine is taken in tablet form. In the body, capecitabine is converted into the active molecule that has anti-cancer effects. This molecule is called 5-FU. The transformation of capecitabine to 5-FU occurs through specific proteins in the liver, also known as enzymes. Unfortunately, capecitabine can also cause side effects. One of the most common side effects is hand-foot syndrome. In hand-foot syndrome, the palms of the hands and soles of the feet become red and painful. Previous research has shown that patients in whom one of the enzymes responsible for converting capecitabine in the liver does not function properly experience an increase in side effects frequency, particularly severe hand-foot syndrome. This specific enzyme is called CES1. It is believed that side effects occur more frequently because capecitabine is transformed more slowly, eventually leading to a prolonged exposure to 5-FU in the body. In roughly one in three people, this enzyme functions less efficiently. To gain a better understanding of how this mechanism works, we aim to conduct this study. In this study, we will examine if patients with a less effective CES1 enzyme have higher amounts of 5-FU in their blood. We will also look into whether these patients develop side effects, such as hand-foot syndrome, more frequently. This information could eventually help us develop new strategies to reduce side effects for these patients in the future.

Bronchoscopic endoscopy has shown its effectiveness and reliability for the treatment (desobstruction or prothesis) of tumor-induced bronchial obstructions, particularly in the first few weeks. The presence of a lower airway prosthesis can lead to device obstruction requiring daily inhaled fluidification, bacterial colonization, migration of the prosthesis, or the appearance of obstructive or hemorrhagic granulomas. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of life of patients after endobronchial treatment. It is a prospective, descriptive, and multicentric (national) study. The main objective is to compare the total score on the Saint-George questionnaire at J7 of the interventional endoscopy compared to before the procedure.

The study is a single-center, prospective, single-arm, Phase II clinical trial. Eligible patients with advanced solid malignant tumors will sign the informed consent form and undergo screening for enrollment. After enrollment, patients will receive oral administration of "PRaG-1" twice daily (morning and evening) for a total of 10 days. Peripheral blood lymphocyte tests will be performed before treatment, on day 5 post-treatment, and at the conclusion of treatment.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the pre-filling work on target and non-target lesions, and the detection of any new lesions reported by the MEM trained in protocol evaluations, in a structured table to prepare the radiologist's work in interpreting RECIST 1.1 scans. To meet this objective, patients taking part in the CIMER study will first have been included in a research protocol requiring scans with RECIST 1.1 interpretation. The Baseline examination will be performed and interpreted according to RECIST 1.1 without informing the radiologist performing the reading that the patient is included in the study, so as not to introduce an interpretation bias. During the first evaluation. The investigating MEM alone will carry out a preliminary analysis of the first evaluation and will present his results to the radiologist in charge of the evaluation, who will validate the conformity of the results.

This is an open-label, first-in-human, Phase I clinical study aimed at evaluating the safety, tolerability, PK, immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor efficacy of AK138D1 in subjects being treated for advanced solid tumors.

HS-20124 is a novel DAR-8 antibody-drug conjugate （ADC） targeting CDH6. In preclinical studies, it inhibited tumor cell growth expressing CDH6 in vitro and in vivo. The first-in-human trial is conducted to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT), to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of HS-20124 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

This is an exploratory clinical study evaluating the safety, tolerability, immune response and preliminary efficacy of LM103 Injection in combination with PD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumours. The research treatment includes LM103 injection, IL-2 therapy, PD-1 therapy,fludarabine and cyclophosphamide.

The management of older patients with cancer has become a major public health concern in Western countries because of the aging of the population and steady increase in cancer incidence with advancing age. Cancer treatment of aged patients is complex due to comorbidities, polypharmacy and functional status. The heterogeneity of the older population in terms of comorbidities and functional status may explain the difficulty in establishing management recommendations. Study hypothesis is that a geriatric consultation using Geriatric Assessment (GA) can evaluate patient's resource and strengths, in order to help oncologist to define the most effective treatment. The GA developed by geriatricians and recommended by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), is a multidimensional assessment of general health status; comorbidities; functional status; nutritional, cognitive, psychological, and social parameters; and medications. The GA uses validated geriatric scales to produce an inventory of problems, which can then serve to develop an individualized geriatric intervention plan; it may be an important step in selecting elderly patients for cancer screening and treatment. The objectives are: * To assess the role of GA for decision making process for older patients with cancer * To identify geriatric and oncologic factors associated with overall survival, treatment feasibility, toxicities, morbidities * To develop and/or validate screening tests for frailty in geriatric oncology * To develop and validate frailty classifications Method: The ELCAPA (ELderly CAncer PAtient) survey is a French multicentric prospective study that includes all patients age 70 years or older who has a diagnosis of solid cancer or hematologic malignancies in French hospitals