About this trial
This study aimed to compare assisted intubation using the ProVu video stylet device passing through Fekry airway versus intubation without the use of Fekry airway .
The investigators hypothesized that endotracheal intubation assisted by ProVu video stylet using the Fekry airway as a conduit for intubation would improve the glottic visualization and the higher first attempt success rate when compared to endotracheal intubation assisted by ProVu video stylet without using the Fekry airway.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
• American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II.
Patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation of less than 2 hours duration .
Ganzouri Airway score <3.
Disqualifiers
Patient with Active cardiac condition.
Patient with airway congenital anomaly.
Mallampati score III or IV.
Body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² (obesity).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
ProVu video stylet
DeviceGroup C (n=55): Intubation using the ProVu video stylet without the Fekry Airway.
ProVu video stylet and Fekry Airway
DeviceGroup F (n =55): endotracheal Intubation assisted by the ProVu video stylet and using Fekry Airway
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Time to successful intubation
It is defined as time in seconds elapsing from touching assimply of ProVu video stylet to insisors (C group)or to Fekry Airway ( F group) till connecting the endotracheal tube to ventlatory circuate after removal of assimply
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.