About this trial
This randomized controlled trial compares periarticular vasoconstrictor infiltration (PVI) versus erector spinae plane block (ESP) to reduce bleeding and postoperative pain in adults undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (up to 3 levels). Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ultrasound-guided ropivacaine 0.2% + epinephrine 1:200,000: PVI (150-200mL bilateral in retrolaminar, thoracolumbar fascia, supraspinous ligament, subcutaneous planes) or ESP (20mL/side at transverse processes). Both groups receive standardized general anesthesia (TIVA), multimodal analgesia (dexamethasone, paracetamol, dexketoprofen/metamizole, ketamine, magnesium), and tranexamic acid. Multicenter study: Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, 32 patients) and Hospital Quirón Salud Murcia (30 patients). Primary outcome: intraoperative blood loss (surgical aspirate minus irrigation + gravimetric gauze weight). Secondary outcomes: Fromme surgical field scale, pain (NRS at REA discharge/24h/48h), opioid consumption (morphine equivalents), PONV/antiemetic use, drain output, hospital stay, patient satisfaction. N=62 patients (31/arm). Blinded outcome assessment.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
More than 18 years old.
ASA I-III
Scheduled primary spinal instrumentation surgery (lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion)
Signed informed consent
Disqualifiers
Allergy/contraindication to study drugs (ropivacaine, epinephrine)
Coagulopathy.
Infection at block site
Neuromuscular disease affecting evaluation.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Periarticular vasoconstrictor infiltration (PVI)
Procedure/SurgeryPeriarticular Vasoconstrictor Infiltration (PVI) vs ESP Block: Multi-level infiltration technique (4 planes: retrolaminar, thoracolumbar fascia, supraspinous ligament, subcutaneous) vs single interfascial injection. High-volume (150-200mL bilateral, 20mL/vertebra) vs low-volume (40mL total). Multiple punctures (4-6 levels) vs single-level per side. Paravertebral chemical sympathectomy vs somatic nerve blockade. Targets surgical field bleeding control + analgesia vs thoracic dermatomal analgesia only.
Erector Spinae Block (ESP)
Procedure/SurgeryErector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) vs PVI Infiltration: Single interfascial injection vs multi-level infiltration. Low-volume (20mL/side, 40mL total) vs high-volume (150-200mL). Single puncture per side at transverse processes vs multiple punctures (4-6 levels). Tip positioned above transverse process targeting erector spinae interfascial plane vs 4 anatomical planes (retrolaminar, fascia, ligament, subcutaneous). Somatic nerve blockade (thoracic dermatomes) vs paravertebral chemical sympathectomy + analgesia.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Total Surgical Bleeding
Total blood loss measured by aspiration from surgical field + weighed gauzes (after subtracting irrigation fluid volume)
Secondary outcomes
Postoperative Pain (NRS)
Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) for pain intensity
Opioid Consumption
Total morphine equivalents (rescue doses) in first 48h
Fromme Surgical Field Grade
Surgical field bleeding quality (Grade 0-4)
Length of Hospital Stay
Days from surgery to hospital discharge
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.