Randomized Controlled Study of Optical 3D Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Achalasia.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorZhang Nina

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of achalasia in patients diagnosed with achalasia by comprehensive evaluation of clinical symptoms, HREM, and barium meal examination, optimize rTMS treatment parameters, and provide an effective and noninvasive new treatment strategy for achalasia. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. To investigate the clinical efficacy of individualized treatment of achalasia with optical 3D navigation repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. 2. Optimize rTMS parameters to achieve the best clinical treatment.

Participants will need to fill out the Eckardt score scale and SF-36 quality of life scale, undergo cranial T1 structural magnetic resonance for functional connectivity analysis, and select the brain region with the strongest positive functional connectivity to the DMV as the rTMS target. All patients were randomly divided into four groups: sham-rTMS group, 5Hz-rTMS group, 10Hz-rTMS group, and 30Hz-rTMS group, and each group received acute and chronic stimulation, respectively. In the acute stimulation stage, patients only need to do rTMS once, and HREM and HRV detection are given before and after rTMS (stimulation for 1s, interval for 4s, 10 pulses per second, receiving a total of 3000 pulses); in the chronic stimulation stage, patients receive 25 minutes of rTMS actual stimulation or sham stimulation each time, lasting for 20 times, which is completed within 30 days, and the actual stimulation parameters are the same as those of acute stimulation, and the sham stimulation coil is consistent with the appearance and sound of proper stimulation, but there is no substantial stimulation. High-definition esophageal manometry, timed barium meal, heart rate coefficient of variation, and serum neurotransmitters were performed before and after chronic stimulation. Finally, a weekly telephone follow-up was performed for 12 weeks, including Eckardt score and SF-36 quality of life scale.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged more than 18 years old, less than 75 years old;

Clinical symptoms evaluation, HREM, esophageal barium meal examination confirmed the diagnosis of achalasia;

Willing to sign informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Presence of metal hardware in close contact with the discharge coil (e.g., cochlear implant, internal pulse generator, or drug pump). Note: Cochlear implants include electrodes, magnets, loop antennas, and electronic chips under the scalp implanted in the cochlea;

Intracranial metal implants;

Patients with cardiac pacemakers, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) systems, spinal cord stimulators, and deep brain stimulation implanted with pulse generators should be used with caution;

People at higher risk of noisy hearing loss and patients with hypoacusis symptoms should be used with caution;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Device

    Intervention Name and Specification 1. Transcranial magnetic stimulator (M-100 Ultimate, Yingzhi Technology Co., Ltd., China) . 2. 70-mm-diameter figure-of-eight coil (BY90A, Yingzhi Technology Co., Ltd., China). 3) Placebo coil (Magstim Company, Whitland, UK): the appearance and sound were consistent with the true coil, but no current stimulation was produced.

  • Sham

    Device

    Placebo coil (Magstim Company, Whitland, UK):

Treatment groups

112 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Sham groupSham comparator 1 intervention
Group B: rTMS groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Eckardt score

The Eckardt scoring system is used to assess the severity of symptoms, with 0 to 1 in grade 0, 2 to 3 in grade I., 4 to 6 in grade II., and \> 6 in grade III. The more severe the symptoms, the higher the score, and can also be used for efficacy assessment.

Time frame
Measured immediately after intervention.
2

Real-time esophageal barium meal examination

The severity of the patient 's condition and the therapeutic effect were evaluated by defining the height and maximum width of the residual barium area.

Time frame
Measured immediately after intervention.
3

High-resolution esophageal manometry(HREM)

HREM is the gold standard for the diagnosis of achalasia of cardia (AC), which can assess the relaxation ability of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the contraction ability of the esophageal body. HREM dynamically collects the mean pressure data of multiple parts of the whole esophagus in real time, and converts the linear manometry pattern into color pressure topography. The basic manometry parameters include integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), which can more truly reflect the relaxation function of the gastroesophageal junction (EGJ) and are the key indicators for the diagnosis of AC.

Time frame
Measured immediately after intervention.

Secondary outcomes

1

Heart rate variability assessment

Dynamic electrocardiogram recording analysis of sympathetic vagal activity.

Time frame
Measured immediately after intervention.
2

Neurotransmitter detection analysis

Serum ACh, NO and VIP

Time frame
Measured immediately after intervention.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Zhang Nina

Lead sponsor

The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: