Esophageal Achalasia

this study is prospective , randomized and interventional ,will be performed on 50 patients to compare the clinical utility , safety profile and postoperative recovery metrics between short and long per-oral endoscopic myotomy , patients will be divided randomly into two equal groups one will do short myotomy and the other group will do long myotomy , each group will contain 25 patients methodology \&patient selection : patients follow the inclusion criterias including : * Patients of all ages were eligible for inclusion in the study with no upper or lower age limits applied . * Both sexes are included . * Type II achalasia patients who are diagnosed by High Resolution. Manometry based on Chicago Classification (v4.0) characterized by (failed esophageal peristalsis , pan-esophageal pressurization in ≥20% of swallows and Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) \>15 mmHg ). * Eckardt score \>3 ( moderate to severe symptoms). this study aims to compare the outcomes of short versus long esophageal myotomy in cases with type II achalasia using Eckardt score and barium study at 3 month follow up. also to evaluate difference in length of the opearation , intra-operative and post-operative adverse events between short and long submucosal tunneling. every patient will do upper endoscopy and manometry preoperative , also ekcardt score will be caculated , follow up after 3 months by barium swallow and eckardt score

The purpose of this study is to identify markers in the blood and tissue that could indicate risk factors for the development and progression of esophagus cancer. This research aims to collect medical history, blood, and tissue samples from patients who present with an esophageal disorder. Identifying genetic and behavioral risk factors involved in the development of esophageal cancer might allow for early detection and prevention. Survival and an opportunity for a cure with esophageal cancer will depend greatly on the stage of diagnosis. Tumors can develop changes in their genetic (hereditary) make-up, and these changes can sometimes be seen in normal tissues before the development of cancer. These genetic (hereditary) changes can serve as tumor markers and can be detected using methods that study changes in genetic material like DNA and RNA. The analysis of proteins can provide additional information. By identifying changes in these molecules that are different or altered in cancer, the investigators can use methods and tests for the detection of these changes.

The goal of this pragmatic, registry-based, randomized clinical trial is to find out if using botulinum toxin (Botox) to help drain the stomach during an esophagectomy works as well as a pyloromyotomy in patients undergoing elective esophagectomy for benign or malignant esophageal disease. Both methods are intended to prevent problems with food emptying too slowly from the stomach (delayed gastric emptying), which can cause discomfort after surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: Is intrapyloric Botox injection as a drainage procedure during esophagectomy non-inferior in preventing symptoms of delayed gastric emptying at 6 months postoperatively compared to pyloromyotomy? Researchers will compare intrapyloric Botox injection to pyloromyotomy to see if Botox is non-inferior to pyloromyotomy in easing symptoms of delayed gastric emptying. Participants will: Be randomized to one of two treatment groups-either intrapyloric Botox injection or pyloromyotomy-during their esophagectomy. Complete surveys assessing digestive symptoms at standard postoperative follow-up intervals (3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively). Undergo a standard gastric emptying study at 6 months after surgery.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure used to treat achalasia and other spastic esophageal motility disorders. A key step in POEM is creating a small opening in the esophageal lining (mucosal incision) to enter the submucosal tunnel. This study evaluates whether making that entry incision \*\*transverse\*\* (across the esophagus) versus \*\*longitudinal\*\* (along the esophagus) improves procedural efficiency without reducing safety. This is a \*\*multicenter, randomized (1:1), parallel-group clinical trial\*\* conducted in three therapeutic endoscopy units in Colombia (Hospital Universitario del Valle and Clínica Versalles in Cali, and Clínica del Occidente in Bogotá). Adults (≥18 years) with an indication for POEM, ASA I-III, and ability to provide informed consent will be eligible; key exclusions include prior myotomy/major esophageal surgery, uncorrectable coagulopathy, pregnancy, active systemic infection, anesthesia contraindication, or anticipated technical inability to perform POEM. All procedures are standardized: POEM under \*\*general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation\*\*, \*\*CO₂ insufflation\*\*, validated endoscopic knives and preset electrosurgical modes; hemostasis with \*\*Coagrasper® only if needed\*\*; and closure using standard \*\*through-the-scope (TTS) clips\*\*. Participants are randomly assigned to a \*\*15 mm transverse mucosal incision\*\* (perpendicular to the esophageal axis) or a \*\*15 mm longitudinal mucosal incision\*\*. Full-procedure video is recorded for quality control and to allow objective timing, with blinded assessment of the primary outcome. The \*\*primary outcome\*\* is the time (seconds) from the first mucosal cut to successful entry of the endoscope cap into the submucosal tunnel (advancing at least 1 cm). \*\*Secondary outcomes\*\* include need for hemostasis with Coagrasper®, number of clips required for complete closure, and early complications (including perforation and gas-related events such as capnoperitoneum requiring decompression and emphysema), monitored through \*\*30 days\*\*. Participants complete a screening/preoperative visit (up to 30 days before), undergo the POEM procedure, have early in-hospital/discharge assessment (days 1-2), and receive safety follow-up contacts at approximately 1 week and day 30. Risks are those expected from standard POEM and peri-anesthesia care (e.g., bleeding, perforation, infection, and gas-related complications), and participants may not directly benefit clinically. However, the transverse incision may shorten access and closure time and reduce resource use without increasing short-term complications. The study will be conducted with written informed consent, confidentiality protections (pseudonymization and secure storage), and reporting of results in aggregate form.

Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a treatment of choice for achalasia with an excellent safety and efficacy profile. There is a high rate of esophagitis related to gastroesophageal reflux following this procedure. There is no recommendation on the prescription of protein pump inhibitors (PPI) after the procedure and no study has studied the benefit of systematic prescription of PPI after POEM for achalasia. The study authors hypothesize that routine PPI prescribing post-POEM for 12 months would reduce the rate of esophageal acid exposure compared to a symptom-based prescribing strategy.

The aims of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional myotomy (circular myotomy) and modified myotomy (full-thickness myotomy) in the treatment of achalasia patients.

The hypothesis of this study is to investigate cardiorespiratory and renal complications in patients under general anesthesia undergoing POEM surgery.

Outcome after treatment of achalasia is usually assessed by the Eckardt score (ES). The timed barium esophagogram (TBE) is used to objectively assess esophageal clearance after treatment. High-resolution manometry with impedancemetry (HRiM) provides information on esophageal clearance of liquids in addition to motility parameters. The aim of this study was to compare esophageal clearance determined by HRiM and TBE in patients with achalasia treated by POEM.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of achalasia in patients diagnosed with achalasia by comprehensive evaluation of clinical symptoms, HREM, and barium meal examination, optimize rTMS treatment parameters, and provide an effective and noninvasive new treatment strategy for achalasia. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. To investigate the clinical efficacy of individualized treatment of achalasia with optical 3D navigation repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. 2. Optimize rTMS parameters to achieve the best clinical treatment. Participants will need to fill out the Eckardt score scale and SF-36 quality of life scale, undergo cranial T1 structural magnetic resonance for functional connectivity analysis, and select the brain region with the strongest positive functional connectivity to the DMV as the rTMS target. All patients were randomly divided into four groups: sham-rTMS group, 5Hz-rTMS group, 10Hz-rTMS group, and 30Hz-rTMS group, and each group received acute and chronic stimulation, respectively. In the acute stimulation stage, patients only need to do rTMS once, and HREM and HRV detection are given before and after rTMS (stimulation for 1s, interval for 4s, 10 pulses per second, receiving a total of 3000 pulses); in the chronic stimulation stage, patients receive 25 minutes of rTMS actual stimulation or sham stimulation each time, lasting for 20 times, which is completed within 30 days, and the actual stimulation parameters are the same as those of acute stimulation, and the sham stimulation coil is consistent with the appearance and sound of proper stimulation, but there is no substantial stimulation. High-definition esophageal manometry, timed barium meal, heart rate coefficient of variation, and serum neurotransmitters were performed before and after chronic stimulation. Finally, a weekly telephone follow-up was performed for 12 weeks, including Eckardt score and SF-36 quality of life scale.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder, which leads to clinical symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain and consecutive weight loss. Although conventional treatment such as laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and balloon dilatation (BD) can provide sufficient symptom relief in many patients, both interventions have their individual drawbacks. Additionally, treatment after failed LHM or BD can be challenging and in few might even lead to esophagectomy. Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and prolonged dilatation (PRD) are two novel endoscopically performed therapeutic options for achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. Both not only appear to provide good results, when performed as initial treatment but also might be an excellent option after e.g failed LHM. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of four different treatment options, such as POEM, PRD with stent-fixation, PD and conventional LHM for achalasia in an individualized treatment setting.