Recall and Perceived Applicability of Ganzouri Airway Scoring System Versus LEMON Score for Airway Assessment Among Anesthesia Residents

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age25-28
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

Our aim is to compare the recall and perceived clinical applicability of Ganzouri airway scoring system versus LEMON score for airway assessment from residents' perspective.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Enrolled anesthesiology residents.

Currently training at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals.

Willing to participate and provide informed consent.

Available for entire study duration (baseline through 2-week followup).

Disqualifiers

Residents with prior formal training in either Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems (defined as structured lecture or workshop exceeding 30 minutes).

Residents who will be on leave, rotation at external sites, or otherwise unavailable during the 2-week follow-up period.

Refusal to participate or provide consent.

Trial population

This study was designed as a prospective observational educational study that compared the recall and perceived clinical applicability of two airway assessment scoring systems: the Ganzouri Airway Score and the LEMON Score

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ganzouri Airway Scoring System

    Other intervention

    This scoring system evaluates seven parameters: 1. Mouth opening (interincisor distance) 2. Thyromental distance 3. Mallampati classification 4. Neck movement 5. Ability to prognath (mandibular protrusion) 6. Body weight 7. History of difficult intubation Each parameter was scored, score interpretation from 1- 4 with increasing difficulty , ≥4 suggesting awake intubation.

  • LEMON Score

    Other intervention

    The LEMON mnemonic represents: 1. Look externally (facial trauma, large incisors, beard, etc.) 2. Evaluate 3-3-2 rule (mouth opening, hyomental distance, thyroidtomouth distance) 3. Mallampati score 4. Obstruction (presence of airway obstruction) 5. Neck mobility

Treatment groups

44 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Study group2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Mean total immediate recall score

The total immediate recall score was assessed using a structured recall checklist within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures.

Time frame
Within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures

Secondary outcomes

1

Mean total delayed recall score at Day 14

The total delayed recall score will be assessed using the same structured recall checklist 14 days after completion of the educational lectures.

Time frame
14 days after completion of the educational lectures
2

Resident satisfaction

Residents' satisfaction was assessed using a structured post-lecture questionnaire with five-point Likert-scale responses.

Time frame
14 days after completion of the educational lectures

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.