Recognition of a Cardiac Arrest Within the EMS
ConditionCardiac Arrest
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHôpital NOVO
About this trial
This study aims to evaluate the average time taken by the Medical Regulation Assistants (MRA) to detect a cardiac arrest during the call to the EMS as well as the factors influencing this delay.
Its main objective is to evaluate the delay, in seconds, between the call being picked up and the recognition of a cardiac arrest by the medical regulation assistant at the EMS 95
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
Traumatic context
Call involving cardiac arrest already identified as such by the caller or 18
Call with criteria of proven death
The caller does not speak French, the linguistic elements noted are not usable.
Trial population
Medical regulation assistant taking a call from a witness of a cardiac arrest between 01/01/2024 and 30t/04/2024
Trial design
Design model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Time elapsed between the taking in charge of the call and the recognition of a cardiac arrest by the MRA
Other interventionProspective study within the EMS 95, to evaluate if the maximum delay of 90 seconds between the call to the EMS and the recognition of the cardiac arrest is reached.
Treatment groups
No treatment groups listed
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Evaluation, of the time elapsed (seconds) between the taking in charge of the call and the recognition of a cardiac arrest by the medical regulation assistant (ARM) of the EMS 95.
Measure of the time in seconds between picking up the phone and the recognition of the cardiac arrest by the medical regulation assistant
Time frame
At the end of the study, an average of 5 monthSecondary outcomes
1
Identify language that highlights cardiac arrest
Collection of the initial reason for appeal and everything said by the witness that may point to cardiac arrest
Time frame
At the end of the study, an average of 5 month2
Identify language that increases the time to detect cardiac arrest
Collection of everything said by the witness increasing the detection of the cardiac arrest
Time frame
At the end of the study, an average of 5 month3
Evaluation of the time required for the MRA to initiate a procedure (AED search: External Automated Defibrillator or initiation of external cardiac massage assistance)
Collection of time (seconds) between : * the MRA taking the call and requesting an AED search * the MRA taking the call and the start of external cardiac massage
Time frame
At the end of the study, an average of 5 month4
Identification of factors that may influence the time to recognition of cardiac arrest (MRA experience, tone of the call)
Collection of call tone (witness anxiety level) and MRA experience in years
Time frame
At the end of the study, an average of 5 monthSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov