Redo-Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Versus Without Posterior Wall Ablation - The REDO-PIFPAF-PFA Study

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

About this trial

The study will compare two ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing repeat ablation using pulsed-field ablation: redo pulmonary vein isolation only versus redo pulmonary vein isolation with added posterior wall ablation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Documented recurrence of paroxysmal or persistent AF following single prior catheter ablation with PVI, confirmed by 12-lead ECG, Holter monitoring, or ICM within the last 2 years.

Candidate for repeat catheter ablation according to current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) AF management guidelines.

Continuous oral anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) for ≥ 4 weeks prior to the ablation, or transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and/or cardiac computed tomography (CT) within 48 hours before the procedure excluding LA thrombus.

Age ≥ 18 years at the time of informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Previous LA surgery

> 1 prior LA ablation

LA ablation outside of the PVs in the first LA ablation

LA diameter >60 mm in the parasternal long axis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pulmonary vein isolation with posterior wall ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Redo-pulmonary vein isolation with left atrial posterior wall ablation using pulsed-field ablation technology. At the end of the procedure, an implantable cardiac monitor will be implanted for the purpose of continuous arrhythmia monitoring.

  • Pulmonary vein isolation without posterior wall ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Redo-pulmonary vein isolation without left atrial posterior wall ablation using pulsed-field ablation technology. At the end of the procedure, an implantable cardiac monitor will be implanted for the purpose of continuous arrhythmia monitoring.

Treatment groups

270 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention ArmExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control ArmActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia day 61-365

Time to first recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT)) between day 61 and 365 post ablation as detected on an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). AF, AFL or AT will be defined as an episode of at least 120 seconds (the shortest-duration episode that could be programmed for detection on the implantable cardiac monitor) with a continuous atrial arrhythmia of at least 30 seconds.

Time frame
Day 61-365 post-ablation

Secondary outcomes

1

Treatment-emergent adverse events: Cardiac tamponade requiring drainage

Number of patients with cardiac tamponade requiring drainage after PVI

Time frame
Day 0-90 post-ablation
2

Treatment-emergent adverse events: Persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting >24 hours

Number of patients with persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting \>24 hours after PVI

Time frame
Day 0-90 post-ablation
3

Treatment-emergent adverse events: Serious vascular complication requiring intervention

Number of patients with serious vascular complications requiring intervention after PVI

Time frame
Day 0-90 post-ablation
4

Treatment-emergent adverse events: Stroke or TIA

Number of patients with stroke or TIA after PVI

Time frame
Day 0-90 post-ablation

Other outcomes

1

Time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with versus without left atrial posterior wall scar

Subgroup analysis; scar is based on the 3D pre-ablation voltage map at baseline

Time frame
Day 61-365 post-ablation

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Lead sponsor

Swiss Heart Foundation

Collaborator

Boston Scientific Corporation

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: