Remimazolam Versus Midazolam for General Anesthesia Induction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine

About this trial

This prospective observational cohort study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of two benzodiazepine sedatives-remimazolam and midazolam-used for general anesthesia induction in elderly patients (≥65 years) undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Elderly patients have reduced organ reserve and altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, increasing their susceptibility to anesthesia-related complications such as intraoperative hypotension, delayed emergence, and postoperative delirium. Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine metabolized by organ-independent tissue esterases, is hypothesized to offer greater hemodynamic stability, faster recovery, and a more favorable safety profile than midazolam in this vulnerable population. Investigators prospectively observe and collect data without altering routine clinical care; the choice of sedative is made by the attending anesthesiologist according to standard practice. Propensity score methods will be used to reduce confounding by indication.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age 65 years or older.

Scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia.

American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to IV.

Planned airway management with tracheal intubation or a laryngeal mask airway.

Disqualifiers

Long-term preoperative benzodiazepine use.

Known allergy or contraindication to benzodiazepines, flumazenil, opioids, naloxone, or related drugs.

History of drug abuse or alcoholism within the past 2 years.

No preoperative cognitive assessment available.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Not listed

Trial groups

1,000 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups