General Anesthesia

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the impact of operating room noise on bispectral index (BIS) and hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Environmental noise in operating rooms, often overlooked, may influence anesthesia depth, patient safety, and physiological stability. A total of 70 adult patients (ASA I-II, 18-65 years, elective surgery under general anesthesia) will be enrolled at Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital. Patients will be categorized into two groups based on intraoperative average noise levels: noisy group (\>65 dB) and quiet group (\<55 dB). Noise levels will be measured every 10 minutes using a CEM DT-8850 sound level meter, BIS will be recorded every 10 minutes, and hemodynamic variables (systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate) will be recorded every 5 minutes. Primary outcome is the correlation between mean intraoperative noise levels (LAeq) and BIS values during the maintenance phase of anesthesia. Secondary outcomes include the relationship between noise characteristics (e.g., device-related, human-related, alarms, media) and hemodynamic stability, as well as surgical branch-related noise classifications (high, moderate, low). The study is non-interventional, with no additional risk to participants beyond standard clinical monitoring. Findings are expected to provide evidence on the role of environmental noise in anesthesia quality, inform operating room organization, and contribute to patient safety improvements.

Beneficial and harmful effects of spinal versus general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.

This Phase 1 study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of continuous intravenous infusion of KL0011034 Injection in healthy Chinese adults. Approximately 30 participants will be enrolled in three sequential infusion-duration cohorts (1, 2, and 3 hours; 10 participants per cohort). Within each cohort, participants will be randomized in a 4:1 ratio to KL0011034 Injection or active-control propofol for anesthesia maintenance. All participants will receive propofol 2 mg/kg for anesthesia induction. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, recovery, and anesthesia-satisfaction assessments will be performed through 24 hours after dosing. Progression to the next infusion-duration cohort will occur only after the preceding cohort is considered safe and tolerable.

Tracheal intubation in paediatric patients is a high-risk procedure in which failure to achieve successful intubation on the first attempt is associated with an increased risk of complications, including hypoxaemia and airway trauma. Videolaryngoscopes have been increasingly adopted in clinical practice because they improve glottic visualisation; however, evidence of their benefit in paediatric patients remains inconsistent. The VIDEOKIDS trial is a large, pragmatic, international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial designed to compare videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The primary objective is to determine whether videolaryngoscopy increases the rate of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study aims to evaluate the effect of different degrees of neuromuscular blockade on the performance of a video laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during general anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive rocuronium at 0, 0.3, or 0.6 mg/kg, corresponding to 0, 1, or 2 times the ED95, respectively. The primary outcome is oropharyngeal leak pressure measured after LMA insertion. Secondary outcomes include LMA insertion conditions, insertion time and number of attempts, laryngeal view, respiratory parameters, and postoperative airway-related complications.

Airway management is one of the most critical steps of anesthesia, and its complications can be life-threatening. Reduced staffing, differences in personnel experience, and physical and mental fatigue during off-hours (evenings, nights, weekends, and holidays) may affect the quality of care and patient safety - a phenomenon described in the literature as the "after-hours effect." While this effect has been studied for outcomes such as cardiac arrest and intensive care mortality, evidence specific to airway management safety remains limited. This prospective observational cohort study aims to evaluate the effect of shift timing on the safety and efficiency of tracheal intubation in adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia at a single center. Based on the actual start time of anesthesia, patients will be categorized into an in-hours group (08:00-16:00) or an off-hours group (16:01-07:59), without any investigator-assigned intervention. The frequency and type of intubation-related complications, intubation duration, and the pre-intubation sleepiness level of the performing anesthesiologist (assessed using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) will be compared between groups. The investigators hypothesize that intubations performed during off-hours are associated with a higher complication rate and longer intubation duration than those performed during in-hours. Approximately 1000 patients will be enrolled over a period of up to 2 years.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare three airway intubation devices in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia who require tracheal intubation. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the SPHJ-II video-assisted adjustable red-light fluoroscopic tracheal intubation scope improve first-attempt intubation success compared with a visual lighted stylet and a visual intubation fiberscope? * How do the three devices compare in intubation efficiency, intubation-related complications, and peri-intubation physiological responses? Researchers will compare the SPHJ-II, the visual lighted stylet, and the visual intubation fiberscope to evaluate their performance during tracheal intubation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three device groups and undergo tracheal intubation during general anesthesia using the assigned device.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn what is the best anesthetic management in participants with severe stroke that require a medical intervention called mechanical thrombectomy (MT) done to open the occluded brain vessel. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is general anesthesia (GA) better than procedural sedation (PS) for improving functional performance and decrease dependance in daily life 3 months after stroke? GA (a non-arousable state induced by anesthetic medications that require respiratory assistance) or PS (a state of reduced arousal induced by lesser dose of anesthetic medications that do not require respiratory assistance) are both used for MT. GA enables strict immobility that could facilitate the conduct of MT but lessen blood pressure and blood flow in the brain. PS provides less drop in blood pressure but MT could be more difficult due to possible movement and breathing may be decreased. Researchers will compare GA with PS to see which one is better for MT success and for the functional consequences of stroke. Participants will be treated with GA or PS for the intervention of MT and will be followed by researchers during their hospital stay and asked by a telephone interview how is their functional status 3 months after stroke.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of two different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (5 cmH₂O and 8 cmH₂O) on respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Prone positioning may adversely affect lung compliance and gas exchange, making optimal ventilatory strategies essential. Driving pressure and mechanical power are considered key determinants of ventilator-induced lung stress. This study will evaluate the impact of different PEEP levels on respiratory parameters and intraoperative physiological changes.

This prospective observational cohort study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of two benzodiazepine sedatives-remimazolam and midazolam-used for general anesthesia induction in elderly patients (≥65 years) undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Elderly patients have reduced organ reserve and altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, increasing their susceptibility to anesthesia-related complications such as intraoperative hypotension, delayed emergence, and postoperative delirium. Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine metabolized by organ-independent tissue esterases, is hypothesized to offer greater hemodynamic stability, faster recovery, and a more favorable safety profile than midazolam in this vulnerable population. Investigators prospectively observe and collect data without altering routine clinical care; the choice of sedative is made by the attending anesthesiologist according to standard practice. Propensity score methods will be used to reduce confounding by indication.

Emergence agitation (EA) is a common complication during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia, particularly after nasal surgery. Although remimazolam 0.1 mg/kg has been shown to reduce the incidence of EA, this dose may produce excessive sedation and increase the risk of intraoperative burst suppression. This randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial will compare low-dose remimazolam (0.03 mg/kg) with the standard dose (0.1 mg/kg) administered at the end of surgery in adult patients undergoing nasal surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia. The primary objective is to determine whether low-dose remimazolam is non-inferior to the standard dose in preventing emergence agitation. Secondary outcomes include burst suppression, recovery profiles, and safety outcomes.

This study aims to compare the hemodynamic effect of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to lidocaine in preemptive peribulbar block in patients undergoing Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) under general anaesthesia (GA) .

Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the voice box and guide the breathing tube safely into place during anesthesia; it is not a sharp tool blade. There are two types of video laryngoscopes blades: a Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees) and a hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve). Although video laryngoscopes are safe and both types have been used for around 20 years, it is not known whether one type works better that the other in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Because general anesthesia is used in only a small proportion (about 5%) of all cesarean deliveries, research in this area is limited. The main purpose of the study is to assess if a study comparing these two types of blades in the obstetric population is feasible. This is also known as a feasibility study, which aims to test the study plan and determine whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. The results will be used as a guide for a larger study.

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to compare remimazolam anesthesia with planned flumazenil reversal and sevoflurane-based balanced anesthesia in adult women undergoing ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either remimazolam for induction and maintenance followed by flumazenil reversal or propofol induction followed by sevoflurane-based balanced anesthesia. The primary outcome is anesthesia-controlled time, defined as the sum of induction time and emergence time. Secondary outcomes include recovery profiles, postoperative symptoms, quality of recovery, hemodynamic stability, and the incidence of re-sedation. The study will evaluate whether a remimazolam-flumazenil strategy can improve operating room efficiency while maintaining recovery quality and safety comparable to conventional sevoflurane-based anesthesia in the ambulatory surgery setting.

The SOAP registry is a prospective, multicenter, electronic registry. The goal is to investigate the indications, mode of airway management, predisposing factors, and obstetric and anesthetic outcomes of pregnant patients who receive general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is a standard anesthesia technique used in patients at risk of aspiration. Although tracheal intubation following RSI is a frequent and painful procedure, no study has yet evaluated nociception using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) during this procedure. This monocentric prospective observational study aims to describe the impact of RSI on pain measured by ANI, and to explore early complications (desaturation, hypotension, regurgitation) and factors associated with pain and complications. 150 patients undergoing RSI in the visceral surgery operating room at CHPG Monaco will be analyzed.

The main aim of this study is to compare the effects of two different anesthesia methods-(1) general anesthesia alone and (2) combination of general anesthesia with cervical plexus block-on postoperative inflammatory process and amino acid metabolism in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guided sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) through the suprazygomatic approach in optimizing the quality of surgical field as well as its effect on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgeries under general anesthesia.

This will be a randomized comparative study comparing the two supraglottic devices i-gel and Protector, intraoperatively, during minor urological procedures under general anesthesia in adult patient.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of sublingual caffeine in reducing recovery time and incidence of postoperative agitation in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia.

For patients after surgery, quality of recovery has significant impacts on the prognosis, quality of life, and rational allocation of medical resources. Dexmedetomidine and esketamine have each been used during the perioperative period and improved postoperative analgesia and subjective sleep quality. This 2x2 factorial trial is designed to explore the effects of dexmedetomidine, esketamine, and their combination on the quality of recovery in patients recovering from surgery under general anesthesia.

During general anesthesia, particularly in patients undergoing spine surgery in the prone (face-down) position, increased intrathoracic and abdominal pressure may reduce lung compliance and promote the development of atelectasis (partial lung collapse). Atelectasis can impair intraoperative oxygenation and may increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) are routinely used in anesthesia practice to reopen collapsed lung regions; however, it remains unclear whether periodic application of ARM throughout surgery provides additional benefit compared with standard single-time application. This prospective, randomized controlled clinical study aims to evaluate whether periodic alveolar recruitment maneuvers applied during elective spine surgery in the prone position reduce intraoperative atelectasis and improve respiratory mechanics compared with the standard approach of performing ARM only after positioning and before extubation. Adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery under general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to either a periodic ARM group or a standard ARM group. Lung aeration will be assessed using lung ultrasound, a non-invasive and radiation-free bedside imaging method. The primary outcome is the incidence of intraoperative atelectasis assessed before extubation. Secondary outcomes include lung ultrasound aeration scores, respiratory mechanics parameters (such as airway pressures and compliance), oxygenation indices, and the occurrence of transient intraoperative respiratory or hemodynamic events. The findings of this study may help optimize intraoperative ventilation strategies in prone spine surgery and contribute to improved perioperative respiratory safety.

This prospective randomized controlled study will compare the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. Participants will be randomized to maintenance anesthesia with either sevoflurane or desflurane, and ANI responses to a standardized nociceptive stimulus will be measured under equi-minimum alveolar concentration (age-adjusted 1.0 MAC) conditions. The primary objective is to compare the change in ANI before and after tetanic stimulation between the two anesthetic groups. Secondary measurements will include bispectral index, blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal anesthetic concentration around the time of stimulation.

The purpose of the study is to determine which combination of neuromuscular blocking agent and reversal agent is safer to use during anesthesia for patients with chronic kidney disease. The main question it aims to answer is "The use of Cisatracurium with neostigmine leads to less post-operative pulmonary complications than Rocuronium with sugammadex."

Given the huge number of patients mechanically ventilated during general anaesthesia, optimizing alveolar recruitment by limiting pulmonary and systemic aggression is a key objective for further progress in perioperative patient management. During general anaesthesia, ventilation disorders with atelectasis, derecruitment of posteroinferior zones and reduced functional residual capacity (FRC) occur in relation to the operative position, the effect of neuromuscular block and general anaesthesia. These conditions of poor pulmonary aeration favor postoperative respiratory complications and are responsible for excess mortality in the perioperative period. Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) are ventilatory strategies used during general anesthesia that aim to restore lung aeration with Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) sufficient to keep the lungs open afterwards. This pulmonary hyperinflation not only has a major impact on hemodynamics but also presents a risk of barotrauma. ARM is currently performed without precise measurement of the pressures prevailing in the lung. Advanced monitoring is now available and integrated into the latest-generation ventilators and includes the combination of Transpulmonary pressure (TPP) and Electro-Impedance Tomography " (EIT) measurements. The aim of this observational study is to measure and record advanced respiratory monitoring data in a minimally invasive way, during alveolar recruitment tests routinely performed for the target population (obese, prone, laparoscopic surgery). Describe and a posteriori analyze the recorded data and establish a relationship between the PEEP values set by conventional ARM and those determined by advanced monitoring combining EIT and PTP for the same patient.