About this trial
The study's primary goal is to examine the effectiveness of Mulligan's technique in reducing hyperalgesia in lateral epicondylitis, focusing on cervical spine, while also investigating its influence on central sensitization in relation to lateral epicondylitis.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
a positive Maudsley's test and Cozen's test,
positive Spurling and axial distraction tests
limited range of motion of the cervical spine
a positive upper limb tension test (ULTT)
Disqualifiers
participants with any pathologies
participants involved in other studies
patients undergoing corticosteroids treatment
physical therapy sessions, or surgical interventions for elbow or cervical spine issues within the past year
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
SNAGs - eccentric exercise
Other interventionintervention done 2 times per week, 45 minutes each session for 4 weeks
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and sign (LANSS) scale
is a questionnaire to screen neuropathic pain. It Contains five items concerning self-reported pain symptoms, and two items depending on simple clinical examination provided by healthcare professional that's targeting pin-prick threshold and allodynia. Scoring with LANSS: if the participant gains 12 or more out of 24, the pain will be considered of neuropathic origin. LANSS scale demonstrated a sensitivity (83%) and specificity of (87%), effectively identifying (85%) of neuropathic pain.
Pain-free hand grip test
Pain-free grip test is a reliable and valid tool to use with lateral epicondylitis patients with using dynamometer to measure the grip force applied to the point of pain. Some studies recommended to perform the test with elbow relaxed extended, forearm pronated, and repeated 3 times with 1 minute interval, then comparing the average of 3 measurements between affected and non-affected.
Secondary outcomes
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing pain intensity in chronic cases, as evidenced by its effective adaptation into an Arabic version: Arabic Numeric Pain Rating Scale (ANPRS). Reliability of the ANPRS (ICC 0.89) considered good to excellent. Arabic version of NRS considered reliable and valid tool to measure pain levels.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.