SCS Therapy for Patients With Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction After SCI

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital

About this trial

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in treating patients with urinary and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI is a highly disabling condition that can lead to sensory, motor, and autonomic nervous system dysfunction below the injury level. Neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction are common sequelae of SCI, seriously affecting patients' quality of life. Currently, clinical treatments can only partially alleviate urinary and bowel dysfunction, and more effective therapeutic approaches are still needed. Existing clinical studies have shown that SCS is gradually being applied to treat neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction in SCI patients. SCS can significantly improve urinary efficiency, bladder capacity, compliance, and detrusor pressure in SCI patients, thereby enhancing their quality of life. The main questions this study aims to answer include: 1. Can this protocol help patients restore partial urinary and bowel function? 2. Besides the restoration of partial urinary and bowel function , can the SCS therapy could also help patients to restore the walking function.

Patients with urinary and bowel dysfunction more than 6 months after spinal cord injury will undergo epidural spinal stimulation electrode implantation surgery two weeks after functional assessment. Then the parameter optimization and rehabilitation will last for 6 months. The follow-up records and assessments will be conducted monthly at 2, 4, and 6 months after surgery.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age: 18 to 60 years old

Spinal Cord Injury Classification: AIS Grade A, B, C, or D

Injury Duration: > 6 months

Stable and healthy condition, as determined by the investigator; able to complete the entire study period and cooperate with examinations

Disqualifiers

Mental Disorders Patients with obvious mental illnesses (such as anxiety, depression, etc.) who are unable to complete relevant subjective scoring.

Mental and Cognitive Impairments Patients with mental or cognitive disorders who are unable to cooperate with surgeries, undergo programming procedures, or complete follow - up.

Autonomic Reflex Disorders Patients with severe autonomic reflex disorders.

Inability in Surgical and Follow - up Processes Patients who are unable to undergo spinal cord stimulation surgery or cooperate with follow - up.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation and Evaluation

    Other intervention

    Patients with dysuria and defecation disorders due to spinal cord injury lasting over 6 months should undergo subdural spinal cord stimulation electrode implantation surgery two weeks after functional assessment. Device adjustment and parameter confirmation should be conducted four weeks after surgery. Follow-up assessments and examinations should be conducted monthly at 2, 4, and 6 months post-surgery.

Treatment groups

10 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Spinal Cord StimulationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction, NBD

This is a clinical symptom assessment scale for colorectal and anal dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury. It consists of 10 items, including defecation frequency, defecation time, accompanying symptoms, medication status, etc. The maximum score is 47 points, and a score above 14 points indicates severe intestinal dysfunction.

Time frame
Two weeks before the implant surgery, and 2, 4, 6 months after the surgery
2

Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score, NBSS

Including three dimensions: urinary incontinence (8 items), urine storage and voiding (7 items), and outcomes (7 items), with a total of 24 items. Two items are non-scoring items. The first item is categorized based on the patient's bladder management method, and the last item is an overall quality of life assessment to evaluate the patient's voiding pattern and quality of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 points or 0 to 4 points. The total score of the scale is 74 points, with higher scores indicating more significant neurogenic bladder symptoms.

Time frame
Two weeks before the implant surgery, and 2, 4, 6 months after the surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

The Wexner Anorectal Incontinence Scale

It is a scale used to assess the severity of bowel movements in patients, applicable to patients with fecal incontinence caused by various reasons. The scale consists of 5 items, with a scoring range of 0-20 points. A higher score indicates a more severe degree of incontinence.

Time frame
Two weeks before the implant surgery, and 2, 4, 6 months after the surgery
2

Elimination Journal

A voiding diary is a semi-objective examination method. It is recommended to record for 2-3 days or more to obtain reliable results. This examination is non-invasive and reproducible, making it a recommended urinary system assessment for patients with spinal cord injury. The defecation diary includes information such as stool characteristics, frequency of defecation, defecation time, complete emptying sensation, difficulty in defecation, dietary conditions, and methods of assisted defecation. It is widely used in the assessment of diseases accompanied by defecation dysfunction.

Time frame
Two weeks before the implant surgery, and 2, 4, 6 months after the surgery
3

Gastrointestinal Emptying Study

It is a first-line diagnostic method for gastric motility function. Patients need to orally ingest a certain amount of barium sulfate, and then the gastric emptying situation is observed to determine whether the peristaltic function of the gastrointestinal tract is normal.

Time frame
Two weeks before the implant surgery, and 2, 4, 6 months after the surgery
4

Defecography

This is an examination method that involves injecting a contrast agent with the same volume and viscosity as normal feces into the rectum, and observing the morphological and functional changes of the anal canal and rectum during sitting, anal lifting, forceful defecation, and after fecal emptying. It belongs to dynamic X-ray imaging technology and is used to understand the defecation process.

Time frame
Two weeks before the implant surgery, and 2, 4, 6 months after the surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.