Smartwatches for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation (AFib) in Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40+
SponsorTechnical University of Munich

About this trial

Scientific Background: In secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and subsequent anticoagulation therapy reduce the risk of recurrent stroke by approximately 60%. Prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring up to 6 months significantly increases detection of AFib in cryptogenic stroke. Wearables like smartwatches have recently been shown to adequately detect AFib in the general population. Thus, prolonged ECG monitoring after cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) using a smartwatch could lead to a reduction of recurrent stroke by prompting adequate anticoagulation therapy and may constitute a cost-effective, non-invasive, and broadly-available alternative to the current standard of care.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that AFib detection via smartwatch in patients with cryptogenic TIA or ischemic stroke is accurate compared to an implantable event recorder.

Methods: The investigators introduce a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA. In addition to an implanted event recorder as indicated by clinical standard, included patients receive a smartwatch for detection of AFib. ECG-data from smartwatches will be continuously monitored by two independent cardiologists. As soon as AFib is confirmed, a doctoral appointment is set to evaluate start of anticoagulation. The follow-up period will be six months. The study consists of four study visits: a baseline visit, two phone visits at one and three months, and an end of trial visit at six months.

Primary Objective: To compare smartwatch and event recorder based analysis for sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per patient after six months

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Implanted Event Recorder with telemedicinal function (e.g., Biotronik BioMon 3m ProMRI HomeMon or similar)

Stroke detected by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that is not lacunar (lacunar is defined as a subcortical infarct in the distribution of the small, penetrating cerebral arteries whose largest dimension is ≤1.5 cm on CT or ≤2.0 cm on MRI diffusion images)

Absence of extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis causing ≥50 percent luminal stenosis of the artery supplying the area of ischemia

No major-risk cardioembolic source of embolism (i.e., no permanent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, sustained atrial flutter, intracardiac thrombus, prosthetic cardiac valve, atrial myxoma or other cardiac tumors, high-grade mitral valve stenosis, recent (within four weeks) myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction <30 percent, valvular vegetations, or infective endocarditis)

Disqualifiers

Patient is not able to perform 1-lead ECG recording with smartwatch

Patient possesses no smartphone (iOS version ≥10.0 or Android)

Implanted pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)

Pregnancy and breastfeeding period

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Smartwatch

    Device

    Smartwatch with PPG- and 1-lead ECG derived analysis of cardiac arrhythmia. Analysis will be performed centrally at the Cardiology Core Lab at the Klinikum Rechts der Isar.

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Application of SmartwatchExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Sensitivity and Specificity of AFib Detection

To estimate and compare sensitivity and specificity for AFib detection per patient after six months (Comparison of smartwatch based, continuous, automated, cardiologist supervised rhythm analysis of photoplethysmography (PPG)- signal and patient activated 1-lead ECG with Event Recorder based, continuous, automated ECG rhythm analysis).

Time frame
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months

Secondary outcomes

1

To estimate and compare the positive and negative predictive values for AFib detection per patient

Time frame
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
2

Sensitivity and specificity for AFib detection of the automated PPG-signal rhythm analysis

Time frame
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
3

Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any AFib episode

Time frame
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
4

Sensitivity for the detection of AFib episodes >1 hour

Time frame
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.