About this trial
The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety.
Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study.
All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients subjected previously to pars plana vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade.
Disqualifiers
Recurrent retinal detachment
Previous scleral buckling
Previous glaucoma surgery
Bleeding tendencies
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Vitrectomy machine
DeviceActive silicon oil extraction through 23G pars plana system vitrectomy machine
Spring loaded syringe
Device5 mml syringe with spring in its plunger and rubber connection
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Incidence of complications
Incidence of operative and postoperative complications in both groups
Other outcomes
Time required for silicon oil extraction
Total time in seconds needed to completely remove silicon oil, it is recorded by an assistant.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.