Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Dry Needling in Non Specific Chronic Neck Pain

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-40
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

This study aims to compare between the effectiveness of Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (Acupuncture-like TENS) and dry needling on pain intensity, Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of upper trapezius myofascial trigger points, neck range of motion, and neck function in patients with non specific chronic neck pain.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

The presence of a palpable taut band in the skeletal muscle.

The presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band.

Local twitch response provoked by snapping palpation.

Production of a typical referred pain pattern in response to the compression of tender spots.

Disqualifiers

Existence of cervical disc hernia, advanced cervical osteoarthritis, radiculopathy, or myelopathy.

Having trigger point injection or physical therapy in the last 6 months.

Having a rheumatologic disease, such as fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or a hormonal disease, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism.

Existence of kyphosis, scoliosis, forward head posture or cervicogenic headache.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Acupuncture-like TENS

    Other intervention

    The first experimental group will receive 20-minute sessions of TENS, where participants adjust the amplitude to achieve strong muscle twitching beneath the electrodes at an intensity below the pain threshold. Acupuncture-like TENS uses high-frequency pulsed currents at two trains per second with an internal pulse frequency of 100 pps. The pulse pattern is set to "burst," with an asymmetrical biphasic waveform and a pulse duration of 200 µs. Minor fluctuations in pulse rate between 100 and 104 pps were noted using a cathode ray oscilloscope before the experiment.

  • Dry needling

    Other intervention

    The second experimental group will receive 20-minute sessions of dry needling. Patients will be positioned in a prone, relaxed position, and the overlying skin will be cleaned with alcohol. The muscle will be palpated to locate the trigger point (MTrP), with the muscle grasped between the thumb, index, and middle fingers. A solid filiform needle within a guide tube will be inserted into the MTrP using a tapping motion at an oblique angle. The upper trapezius muscle will be palpated for trigger points, with needle insertion depths ranging from 10-15mm. After obtaining a local twitch response, the needle will be moved vertically 3-5mm until no more twitch responses occur. This group will also receive 20 minutes of conventional physical therapy.

  • Conventional treatment

    Other intervention

    All participants in the three groups will receive conventional treatment in the form of hot pack treatment followed by active range of movement (AROM) exercises. A hot pack will be placed on the patients cervical, paraspinal, and upper thoracic areas (including the upper trapezius muscle with aMTrP) for 20 minutes. This will be followed by AROM exercise for cervical spine joints. Participants were asked to actively flex the neck so that the head dropped toward the contralateral trapezius muscles. Patients then rotated the head toward ipsilateral side. This exercise will be repeated five times.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Acupuncture-like TENS + Conventional treatmentExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Dry needling + Conventional treatmentExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: Conventional treatmentActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Assessment of neck pain intensity

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate pain intensity. It is a horizontal line whose length is 10 cm; its left end (zero) indicates no pain, while its right end (ten) reveals the worst imaginable pain. Each subject will be in relaxed position and will be asked to mark the point on the line that exactly corresponded to his/her pain.

Time frame
4 weeks
2

Assessment of pressure pain threshold (PPT)

The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed by positioning the tip of the algometer on the trigger point and increasing the pressure by 1 kg per second. When the patient indicates discomfort, the pressure value will be recorded in kg/cm. The procedure will be repeated three times at 60 s intervals, and the mean pressure value will be recorded as the PPT.

Time frame
4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Measurement of cervical flexion range of motion (ROM)

It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical flexion three times and the mean value will be recorded.

Time frame
4 weeks
2

Measurement of cervical extension ROM

It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical extension three times and the mean value will be recorded.

Time frame
4 weeks
3

Measurement of cervical lateral flexion to the right ROM

It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical lateral flexion to the right three times and the mean value will be recorded.

Time frame
4 weeks
4

Measurement of cervical lateral flexion to the left ROM

It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical lateral flexion to the left three times and the mean value will be recorded.

Time frame
4 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: