Alveolar Bone Loss

This study aims to combine real-world research with relevant bone repair materials and techniques to improve alveolar bone resorption in extraction sockets following impacted wisdom tooth removal, while achieving effective bone preservation or promoting bone regeneration. All eligible cases within specified parameters will be included in the clinical study scope. Based on real-world clinical data, we will proactively collect postoperative clinical examination findings and imaging data. Statistical analysis will be performed on clinical outcomes and follow-up data from patients undergoing mandibular impacted M3 extraction. The study aims to clarify the therapeutic efficacy of the thermosensitive hydroxyethylchitosan-loaded concentrated growth factor group in repairing mesial bone defects of M2s following M3 extraction.

Dental implants are a fixed replacement solution with reported long-term survival rates between 94-98% over 20-40 years. In order to ensure successful implant therapy, adequate bone and soft tissue as well as correct 3D positioning of the implant are required. Upon extraction of a tooth, socket width can decrease by up to 60% within six months post-extraction, with a 11-22% vertical reduction. Additionally, sinus pneumatization occurs post-extraction as the maxillary sinus expands into the empty socket due to disuse atrophy and intra-sinus air pressure, as explained by Wolff's law. This further reduces residual bone height (RBH), often resulting in posterior maxillary sites requiring supplemental procedures to prevent bone loss or to augment the bone height at the time of implant placement. However, if the bone height and width dimensions are sufficient before and after extraction - in that, even with the aforementioned loss in width and height percentages in the latter, a standard implant may still be placed in the surrounding bone, one can argue that grafting may not be necessarily done at the time of extraction. Rather, it can be tailored to the patients' needs; thus potentially reducing overall post-operative discomfort and pain.

This study is designed to evaluate and compare clinically and radiographically the effectiveness of Demineralized Dentin Allograft (DDA) versus Demineralized Dentin Autograft (Auto-DD) for preservation of alveolar ridge dimensions after surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar.

This randomized controlled trial compares two provisional socket-sealing concepts following single non-molar tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation: a fixed, tooth-supported, 3D-printed ovate pontic provisional restoration providing active soft tissue support (test) versus a removable Essix-type provisional restoration without intentional soft tissue contact combined with a porcine collagen matrix seal (control). Both groups receive alveolar ridge preservation using a deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen. The primary endpoint is interproximal soft tissue height at 5 months, adjusted for baseline, assessed by digital superimposition of intraoral surface scans. Up to 40 participants will be enrolled at the University of Bern School of Dental Medicine.

This study investigates whether the intraoperative application of a specialized regenerative gel (Emdogain®) can improve the periodontal health of the mandibular second molar by preventing or reducing the formation of tissue defects after the surgical removal of an adjacent impacted lower wisdom tooth. Surgical extraction of a lower wisdom tooth frequently leaves a deep pocket or a permanent hard and/or soft tissue defect on the back side of the neighboring second molar. This defect compromise the surrounding tissues and predispose the healthy second molar to future complications like root caries, dentin hypersensitivity, or localized gum disease. While most existing treatments address these defects after they have formed, this trial evaluates a site-specific preventive approach during the extraction process itself. The study will involve 70 systemically healthy adults (ages 18-45) requiring surgical removal of a horizontally or mesially oriented impacted lower third molar. Participants will be randomized into two equal groups: The Test Group: Will receive root conditioning with PrefGel and a single application of Emdogain® gel directly to the root surface and socket immediately after tooth removal. The Control Group: Will undergo identical surgery but will follow a natural, spontaneous healing process without the application of any biomaterials. The main objective is to measure changes in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) at the distal aspects of the second molar using stable vertical anatomical reference points over a 6-month period. The trial will also monitor secondary healing parameters, including probing pocket depths, gum recession, radiographic bone level changes using standardized jigs, postoperative pain, swelling, and early tissue healing dynamics.

The purpose of the study is the comparison of bone gained histologically from the Bone Shell Khoury's Technique in comparison with the usage of non-resorbable membrane polytetrafluoroethylene and discussing its eligibility for implant placement in restoring the atrophic posterior mandible.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn if the Inox Nanoksa G-Plus membrane works to rebuild bone in the upper or lower jaw (ridge augmentation) for adults who need dental implants but do not have enough bone width or height. It will also learn about the safety of this membrane and how patients feel after surgery. \- The main questions it aims to answer are: How much pain, swelling, and bleeding do participants experience during the first week after the bone-building surgery? How much new bone width and height does the membrane help grow, as measured on a 3D X-ray (CBCT) taken 6 months after surgery? What medical problems or side effects (such as the membrane becoming visible through the gums, infection, or graft loss) do participants experience? This is a single-treatment study; all participants will receive the same surgery using the Inox Nanoksa G-Plus membrane together with a bone graft material. Participants will: Have surgery to place the membrane and bone graft under their gums to rebuild their jawbone. Take antibiotics and pain relievers, and use a special mouth rinse for about 2 weeks after surgery. Rate their pain, swelling, and bleeding on simple scales on days 1, 3, and 7 after surgery. Return for a checkup at 1 month and have a follow-up 3D X-ray at 6 months. Undergo a second surgery at 6 months to have dental implants placed and to evaluate the newly formed bone.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to assess whether β-TCP (Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate) improves alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in patients who need tooth extraction. The main question it aims to answer is whether using β-TCP for alveolar ridge preservation has a positive effect on bone volume compared with natural healing. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does β-TCP improve ridge preservation compared with natural healing? Researchers will compare β-TCP grafted sockets to natural healing sockets to see if β-TCP better preserves ridge volume. Participants will: Have a tooth indicated for extraction. Be assigned to either β-TCP or natural healing. Undergo CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) and intra-oral scanning after extraction and after six months of healing to measure horizontal and vertical resorption and bone density.

This study will evaluate whether adding a resorbable collagen membrane to an anorganic bone-collagen composite (ABCC) graft improves ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Ridge preservation is a procedure used to maintain the shape and volume of the jawbone following tooth removal, which is important for future dental implant placement. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ABCC alone or ABCC combined with a collagen membrane. Healing outcomes will be assessed after approximately 4 months using three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The primary outcome is the change in horizontal ridge dimension (width). Secondary outcomes include vertical and contour changes in ridge dimensions, changes in soft tissue contour assessed with digital scans, postoperative healing and complications (such as wound dehiscence, swelling, or infection), and patient-reported outcomes, including pain and satisfaction. In a subset of participants, bone healing will also be evaluated using laboratory and imaging analyses of bone samples obtained at the time of implant placement. The study will additionally assess whether the treatment allows implant placement in the ideal position without the need for further bone grafting.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate whether reducing the healing interval for implant placement after extraction socket preservation improves clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with the conventional waiting period. Participants requiring single-tooth extraction and implant therapy will be randomly assigned to implant placement either 4 months or 6 months after ridge preservation using the Vega Plus implant system (Klockner). Clinical and radiographic assessments will be performed at baseline and during follow-up visits. The primary outcome will be the mean change in horizontal alveolar ridge width measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondary outcomes will include vertical bone height changes measured on CBCT, implant stability measured using resonance frequency analysis (ISQ values), marginal bone level changes assessed on standardized periapical radiographs, and postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The results of this study may contribute to optimizing treatment timing and improving efficiency in implant dentistry while maintaining favorable clinical outcomes.

Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus may lead to insufficient bone volume for dental implant placement in the edentulous posterior maxilla. Sinus floor elevation (SFE) surgery with the lateral window technique is a safe and predictable surgical intervention to restore bone height in the maxillary premolar and molar areas. According to the literature, several bone graft materials may be successfully applied for SFE surgery. There is a lack of evidence regarding the application of biphasic calcium sulfate (BCS) for SFE. The healing period following staged SFE is 2-9 months. The aim of this study is: * to evaluate the success of SFE surgery using BCS as graft material, * to compare the microarchitecture of the augmented bone depending on the healing period, * to evaluate the success of dental implants placed in the augmented bone and that of the prostheses delivered on the dental implants.

CGF membranes will be prepared using a swing-lock centrifuge. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated in a narrow alveolar ridge. Implants will be inserted. Autologous bone chips will be harvested via bone scraping and used for augmentation, CGF membranes will be placed over the grafted area. Suturing of the mucoperiosteal flap. Radiographic evaluation of the bone density and tissue thickness will be performed by CBCT preoperatively, immediate postoperative and after the procedure by 4 months. Clinical evaluation of the tissue thickness using periodontal probe preoperatively, immediate postoperatively and after the procedure by 4 months

This prospective case series study aims to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effectiveness of the socket shield technique combined with concentrated growth factors (CGF) in immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. Outcomes will include crestal bone level changes assessed by CBCT and implant stability measured using Osstell.

This prospective case series aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate implant placement using the socket shield technique combined with concentrated growth factors (CGF) and xenograft in the esthetic zone. The study will assess crestal bone level changes and implant stability over a 6-month follow-up period.

This research aims to investigate the influence of alveolar ridge preservation, after extraction of maxillary posterior teeth, on the potential need of sinus floor augmentation procedures (that include lateral or crestal sinus augmentations). From peri-apical radiographs, maxillary posterior teeth will be divided into 4 groups according to the relationship of their apexes with the sinus. Then, the patients will be divided into 2 sub-groups: unassisted socket healing (only extraction) and ARP group (extraction + ARP) and their CBCT scans before implant placement will be collected. The CBCT scans should be at least 4 months post-extraction and ARP. Depending on the residual bone height, patients will be divided into 3 categories, according to the ABC classification: 1. In need of lateral sinus floor augmentation 2. In need of crestal sinus floor augmentation 3. No need for sinus floor augmentation, therefore, implant placement. These divisions will be conducted, according to: \- The residual bone height (RBH) which is the height in mm from the alveolar ridge crest to the lowest point of the maxillary sinus floor. The results of the proposed hypothesis are verified and interpreted after statistical analysis.

This study evaluates two different treatments used to help the jawbone heal after a tooth is removed. When a tooth is extracted, the surrounding bone often shrinks, which can make it difficult to place dental implants later. Currently, doctors often use Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), which is made from the patient's own blood, to help the area heal. This research compares PRF to a newer treatment using "exosomes" derived from stem cells. Exosomes are tiny particles that carry signals to tell the body to repair tissue and grow new bone. The goal of this study is to see if these exosomes work better than PRF at keeping the bone strong and thick after an extraction. Researchers will use specialized X-rays (CBCT) to measure the bone three months after the procedure to see which treatment provided better results.

Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone is often associated with buccal bone deficiency, which may compromise esthetic outcomes and long-term implant stability. Autogenous bone graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity provides corticocancellous bone with favorable biological properties and may help reconstruct the buccal bone plate during immediate implant placement. This prospective case series aims to evaluate the clinical and esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement combined with autogenous maxillary tuberosity graft in the esthetic zone. The primary outcomes include buccal bone thickness measured on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), facial soft tissue thickness measured clinically, and the pink esthetic score (PES) after implant restoration.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate labial bone plate changes following immediate implant placement in Type II extraction sockets using two different xenograft materials and de-epithelialized free gingival graft in the esthetic zone . Patients requiring extraction and immediate implant placement will be randomly allocated into two groups according to the xenograft material used for defect grafting. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be assessed to determine dimensional bone changes and implant success

The aim of this study is to determine whether jawbone augmentations using allogeneic and autogenous bone blocks lead to comparable three-dimensional clinical and radiological outcomes. In addition, the study seeks to investigate whether there are differences regarding safety, biocompatibility, complications, and PROMs. Furthermore, it aims to clarify whether differences exist between the two groups with respect to implant condition (one year after implantation and during annual follow-ups for up to five years).

The design is a single blinded, dual comparative study of ultrasound versus micro-CT/LASCA in one study group. Up to a total of 140 subjects registered will be recruited. Subjects who are treatment planned for extraction of a hopeless tooth and socket augmentation with bone graft and are planned for a dental implant surgery. The socket will be evaluated before the extraction and multi-time points during healing until an implant is placed with various evaluation tools, including ultrasound.

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and histologic efficacy of using bioactive glass bone graft (UNIGRAFT by Biomed Inc., USA) compared to a conventional xenograft in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. A total of 20 patients classified as SA4 according to the Misch classification will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Outcomes will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for vertical bone gain and, where applicable, histologic analysis. The study is conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University.

surgical horizontal augmentation for maxillary alveolar ridge using minimally invasive subperiosteal tunneling in comparison to conventional surgical technique

This study aims to evaluate bone formation in grafts in terms of its quality (density), quantity (volume) and maturation obtained with the application of a tissue-engineered bone grafting compound containing concentrated autogenous cell-culture medium (CM) and a synthetic bone substitute. The present study was designed as an experimental prospective split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. After protocol approval by the Research Ethics Committee, a total of 20 consecutive participants in need of maxillary reconstruction aiming implant-supported oral rehabilitation will be invited to join the study. To collect autogenous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs), an outpatient lipoplasty procedure at the abdominal area of each patient will be performed. To isolate and expand hASCs from the lipoaspirate, specific cell culture protocols will be followed, resulting in cultured viable cells and their conditioned medium (CM). Cells and CM will be then separated by a sequence of filters and centrifugation, and isolated CM will be frozen. ELISA will analyze the presence of chemokines and their concentration in CM before grafting. Following pre-op surgical planning, both maxillary sinuses of each patient will be grafted internally applying a lateral window to each sinus. The bony floor of the test maxillary sinus will be augmented with synthetic bone substitute (BoneCeramic™ 1-2 mm) mixed with 10 to 15 ml of CM (test). The control site will receive bone substitute with saline. Lateral windows in both sinuses will be then closed with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide™). After 6 months, first-stage implant surgery will be performed placing 6 implants in each patient. Registration of implant stability by manual torque wrench will be performed. Also, bone biopsies from each drilled implant site will be collected for histology, histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry (RT-PCR). Tomographic evaluation of the bone formation will include cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) at pre-operative \[Baseline\], 90 \[T1\] and 180 \[T2 = implant placement\] days for bone 3D image analysis.

Periodontal regeneration is a complex process that involves coordinated activities and interactions of many cell types, extracellular matrix, cytokines, and specific growth factors to restore tissue integrity. The most important challenge facing periodontal regeneration is cellular insufficiency. Periodontal defects usually have a limited regenerative capacity due to their bounded surface area which is supposed to provide the wound area with a limited number of viable cells and a limited amount of biologic mediators. Cell recruitment and adhesion into the defect area are essential for cells to survive and secrete collagen. Apoptosis is initiated when failure in adhesion in many different cell types occurs. Some periodontal treatment options failed in the reconstruction of the defect due to failure in wound stabilization and subsequent cell adhesion. Many treatment options have been developed to enhance defect stability and cellular recruitment including the use of GTM and different biologics. However, the treatment outcomes vary considerably depending on the level of the defect cellularity and the degree of cell recruitment into the defect area. For maximum outcomes, enhanced stability, vascularity, and biologics-sustained delivery were suggested. The minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST) suggested by Cortellini et al. offers a suitable level of tissue preservation that could help in defect stability and cellular adhesion. It was suggested to promote flap stability, maintain space, and maintain a greater amount of blood supply at the alveolar crest and papillary levels.

The aim of the current study is to compare the effect socket sealing with flowable resin composite compared to dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane after filling the extraction site with xenograft particles in terms of soft and hard tissue changes, procedural time, post operative pain, patients' satisfaction, and cost effectiveness.