Cesarean Section

Background: Carbetocin is an established single-dose uterotonic agent for postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis at elective cesarean delivery. Despite its proven efficacy, many clinicians routinely add a supplemental oxytocin infusion following carbetocin administration without evidence-based justification. Concurrent oxytocin receptor stimulation may be redundant, counterproductive through receptor desensitization, or incrementally beneficial - a mechanistic uncertainty that remains unresolved in the published literature. Objectives: To determine whether carbetocin monotherapy (100 micrograms IV bolus plus placebo infusion) is non-inferior to carbetocin plus supplemental oxytocin infusion (10 IU over 4 hours) in preventing the need for additional uterotonic agents within 24 hours of elective cesarean delivery. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial with an integrated pilot phase. Phase 1 (Pilot, n=60) establishes local feasibility and event rate. Phase 2 (Full trial, n=332) provides the definitive non-inferiority analysis. Participants: Women aged 18-45 years undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at Qassim University Medical City, singleton pregnancy at or beyond 37 weeks, ASA physical status II, preoperative hemoglobin 9 g/dL or more. Interventions: Group C (Monotherapy): Carbetocin 100 micrograms IV bolus plus placebo saline infusion 500 mL over 4 hours. Group C+O (Combination): Carbetocin 100 micrograms IV bolus plus oxytocin 10 IU in 500 mL saline over 4 hours. Primary Outcome: Proportion of patients requiring at least one additional uterotonic agent within 24 hours of delivery. Secondary Outcomes: Quantitative intraoperative blood loss by gravimetric measurement; total 24-hour blood loss; actual blood loss by Gross formula; hemoglobin and hematocrit changes; uterine tone scores by verbal numerical rating scale (0-10) at 2, 5, and 10 minutes; incidence of postpartum hemorrhage; blood transfusion requirement; hemodynamic profiles; adverse effects. Sample Size: 332 patients (166 per group), non-inferiority margin 10 percentage points, one-sided alpha 0.025, 80% power, estimated baseline event rate 10%, with 15% dropout allowance.

Shared decision-making (SDM) is the accepted ethical and legal standard for informed consent, but it is not known how it operates in anesthesia consent for cesarean delivery. Neuraxial anesthesia is recommended for most cesarean deliveries, and many anesthesiologists therefore present it as the only primary option, with general anesthesia (GA) available only as a rescue. Others present GA as a genuine alternative the patient can choose. This study will observe the existing variation in practice and will not change care. A trained observer will attend the pre-operative anesthesia consent encounter for women having an elective cesarean delivery at BC Women's Hospital and record which options were presented, using the observer-rated OPTION-5 instrument. Written research consent and a questionnaire follow 24-48 hours after delivery, and include the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The primary aim is to compare patient-perceived SDM (SDM-Q-9) between consultations in which GA was offered as a genuine primary option and those in which it was not. This study hypothesizes that the SDM-Q-9 score will be higher when GA was offered as a primary option. Secondary aims are to describe observed SDM, decisional conflict, provider-level variation, and women's preference to be offered a choice in a future cesarean. The findings will inform a planned interventional trial of a standardized consent model.

Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure performed to deliver a baby when vaginal birth may pose risks to the mother or infant. Although it is often life-saving, recovery after cesarean section is frequently associated with multiple physical and psychological challenges, including postoperative pain, delayed gastrointestinal function, reduced mobility, fatigue, and decreased overall well-being. These factors may negatively affect a woman's ability to care for her newborn, initiate breastfeeding, and adapt to the postpartum period. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in non-pharmacological interventions that can safely support postoperative recovery without causing additional side effects. Among these, music therapy, breathing exercises, and virtual reality applications have been identified as promising approaches. Music therapy may promote relaxation and reduce pain and anxiety through auditory stimulation and emotional regulation. Breathing exercises may enhance parasympathetic activity, improve oxygenation, reduce stress, and support gastrointestinal motility. Virtual reality applications, by providing immersive audiovisual experiences, may reduce pain perception, decrease anxiety, and improve overall comfort through distraction and relaxation mechanisms. Although these interventions have individually demonstrated beneficial effects in postoperative care, the existing literature is limited in directly comparing their relative effectiveness within the same study design. Furthermore, most studies have primarily focused on pain outcomes, while other important aspects of recovery, such as obstetric recovery quality and gastrointestinal symptoms, have received less attention. This randomized controlled trial aims to comparatively investigate the effects of music therapy, breathing exercises, and virtual reality application on obstetric recovery, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms in women following cesarean section. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups or a control group receiving routine care. Standardized protocols will be applied for each intervention to ensure consistency. The primary outcomes of this study include obstetric recovery, pain intensity, and gastrointestinal symptoms. By evaluating these outcomes simultaneously, the study aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of post-cesarean recovery. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to evidence-based clinical practice by identifying effective, safe, and feasible non-pharmacological interventions that can be integrated into routine post-cesarean care. Ultimately, this research may help improve maternal comfort, accelerate recovery, and enhance the overall postpartum experience for women undergoing cesarean section.

This study will observe 80 adults having a cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at Kayseri City Hospital. It will compare patients who receive granisetron as part of routine care to prevent nausea and vomiting with patients who do not receive preventive anti-nausea medicine. Granisetron use is decided by the treating anesthesiologist, not assigned by the study. Patients in the granisetron group receive the medicine within 5 minutes before or after spinal anesthesia. The main measurement is the total dose of ephedrine used during the operation. Ephedrine is a medicine used to treat low blood pressure. The study will also record low blood pressure at scheduled measurement points and nausea and vomiting during the operation. Patient enrollment is planned from October 15 to December 15, 2026.

Shivering is a common and distressing complication occurring in 40% to 60% of women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Beyond causing significant maternal discomfort, shivering markedly increases oxygen consumption and metabolic demand, elevates cardiopulmonary workload, and interferes with clinical monitoring. While intravenous meperidine remains a widely used pharmacological agent for shivering prophylaxis, it carries dose-dependent adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, and potential neonatal depression. Intranasal dexmedetomidine provides an alternative needle-free method of administration that rapidly absorbs through the nasal mucosa and reduces shivering without suppressing respiratory drive. The primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine in reducing the incidence of intraoperative shivering compared with intravenous meperidine and placebo in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. A total of 99 parturients will be randomly allocated to one of three parallel groups (33 patients per group) using a double-dummy design: * Group D: Receives intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia, plus an intravenous saline placebo at spinal induction. * Group M: Receives intranasal saline placebo 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia, plus intravenous meperidine (0.5 mg/kg) at spinal induction. * Group C: Receives intranasal saline placebo 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia, plus intravenous saline placebo at spinal induction. Participants will be monitored throughout the surgical procedure to determine the occurrence of shivering, maternal hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation), sedation levels using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), need for rescue anti-shivering medication, side effects, and neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores and birth weight).

Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic method for elective cesarean deliveries, but it frequently causes post-spinal shivering. Shivering causes marked maternal discomfort, interferes with clinical monitoring, and increases oxygen consumption and metabolic workload. This study aims to assess whether a prophylactic intravenous combination of low-dose midazolam and low-dose ketamine reduces the occurrence and severity of shivering compared with a placebo in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. A total of 120 parturients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups: * Combination Group: Receives intravenous midazolam (0.0375 mg/kg) combined with ketamine (0.25 mg/kg) diluted in 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline. * Control Group: Receives 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline intravenously as a placebo. In both groups, the intravenous infusion is administered over 10 minutes immediately following delivery of the infant and clamping of the umbilical cord, ensuring no transplacental transfer of the study medications to the newborn. The primary objective is to evaluate the proportion of patients who develop shivering during the first 60 minutes after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary objectives include shivering severity, the requirement for rescue anti-shivering medication, intraoperative and postoperative sedation levels, hemodynamic stability, body temperature course, potential medication side effects, and maternal satisfaction.

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures in obstetric care. Women with obesity (body mass index \[BMI\] of 30 kg/m² or higher) are at increased risk for postoperative wound complications, including surgical site infections, fluid collections (seroma/hematoma), and wound separation. Postoperative wound dressings protect the surgical incision, but the optimal timing for dressing removal remains uncertain, particularly for high-risk patients. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to compare wound healing and the occurrence of surgical site infections between two standard dressing removal schedules in women with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² undergoing cesarean delivery. Participants are observed in one of two groups according to standard hospital practice: * Group 1: The sterile wound dressing is removed at approximately 48 hours after surgery. * Group 2: The sterile wound dressing is removed at approximately 5 days after surgery. Following dressing removal, incisions are assessed for signs of infection, drainage, swelling, and healing progress. The study aims to provide evidence on whether earlier dressing removal at 48 hours is safe and effective compared to delayed removal at 5 days in women with obesity.

This study aims to evaluate the Effectiveness of Health Educational Program for Primigravida Women in Reducing the Rate of Unnecessary Cesarean Section. Specific objectives: 1. To assess primigravida women's knowledge and attitudes regarding cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery before and after implementation of the health educational program among the study and control groups. 2. To develop and implement a health educational program regarding cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery. 3. To assess primigravida women's choice regarding the mode of delivery before and after implementation of the health educational program among the study and control groups. 4. To evaluate the actual mode of delivery among primigravida women after implementation of the health educational program in both the study and control groups.

This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous dexamethasone versus intravenous ondansetron in preventing low blood pressure (hypotension) following spinal anesthesia in pregnant women with preeclampsia undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic method for cesarean delivery, but it frequently causes a sudden drop in maternal blood pressure. In patients with preeclampsia, post-spinal hypotension can compromise blood flow to the placenta and vital organs. While traditional vasopressor medications are used to restore blood pressure, non-adrenergic prophylactic agents such as dexamethasone and ondansetron may help maintain hemodynamic stability through different physiological pathways. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) or intravenous ondansetron (4 mg) 15 minutes prior to the initiation of spinal anesthesia. Blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressor requirements, optic nerve sheath diameter, and maternal and neonatal outcomes will be monitored throughout the surgery and during the immediate postoperative period.

This prospective observational study will evaluate whether adherence to enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocols is associated with postoperative recovery quality in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. A total of 150 participants will be enrolled. Recovery quality will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 questionnaire at 24 hours after surgery. Pain, opioid use, nausea, mobilization, oral intake, breastfeeding, and patient satisfaction will also be evaluated.

This prospective observational study aims to identify predictors of severe postoperative pain during the first 24 hours after elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors will be evaluated to determine their association with severe postoperative pain.

This study compares two standard ways of giving oxytocin (a medicine that helps the uterus contract) after the baby is born during a planned caesarean section performed under spinal anaesthesia. One group of women will receive oxytocin as a quick injection into the vein. The other group will receive the same dose of oxytocin as a slow infusion over 15 minutes. The researchers want to find out which method causes less drop in blood pressure and other heart-related changes, while still providing good contraction of the uterus and preventing excessive bleeding.

This randomized controlled trial will compare two methods of providing preoperative counseling before elective cesarean delivery: counseling by an obstetrician-gynecologist and counseling delivered through an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system. The study aims to evaluate the effects of these counseling methods on patients' anxiety levels, understanding of medical information, and satisfaction with the counseling process. Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery will be randomly assigned to receive either standard physician counseling or AI-based counseling containing the same medical information. Anxiety, knowledge, and satisfaction will be assessed using questionnaires before and after counseling.

This study will evaluate the effect of fasting duration and elective c-section start time on the overall quality of recovery. Patients will be seen 24 hours after surgery to answer 11 questions on their overall recovery after surgery. Several factors will be tracked to determine their effect on recovery, with the primary variable of interesting

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to determine whether adding abdominopelvic fascial release to a standardized stretching exercise program is more effective than stretching exercises alone in reducing menstrual pain in women following cesarean section. The study will enroll women aged 20 to 35 years with moderate to severe dysmenorrhea after cesarean delivery. Researchers will compare the effects of abdominopelvic fascial release combined with stretching exercises with stretching exercises alone on menstrual pain and scar mobility. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, undergo assessments before and after the intervention period, and receive the assigned treatment according to the study protocol.

The study evaluates the effect of intraperitoneal saline irrigation before abdominal closure during cesarean section on postoperative infectious morbidity and the incidence of paralytic ileus.

Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic technique for patients undergoing cesarean section. Compared with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia offers multiple advantages. However, a common adverse effect of this technique is hypotension following spinal anesthesia, which is induced by sympathetic blockade and has an incidence rate as high as 70%. Hypotension can lead to maternal nausea and vomiting, reduced fetal Apgar scores, and acidosis, exerting adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus. Furthermore, prolonged duration of hypotension may adversely impact the fetal neurological prognosis. Therefore, predicting which patients are at high risk for developing hypotension facilitates the implementation of preventive measures-such as the administration of vasoactive agents and intensified monitoring through frequent blood pressure measurements-to improve clinical outcomes in these high-risk patients. Patients undergoing cesarean section who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively observed. A standardized anesthesia protocol was uniformly applied to investigate the incidence of hypotension following spinal anesthesia. Based on dynamic changes in preoperative and intraoperative heart rate, blood pressure, perfusion index, and waveform characteristics of electrocardiography and pulse oximetry, a prognostic model was developed to predict the occurrence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia.

This single-center randomized controlled trial evaluates whether donor-derived fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) administered within 6 hours after birth can improve gut microbiota development and reduce the risk of immune-mediated and metabolic diseases in infants born by elective cesarean delivery. Newborns are randomized 1:1 to receive either donor-derived FMT or standard postnatal care. Participants are followed through 36 months of age with stool samples, questionnaires, growth assessments, and health data collection, with registry-based follow-up continuing until 10 years of age.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative vaginal cleansing with 5% povidone-iodine in reducing postoperative infectious morbidity among women undergoing cesarean section. The primary outcomes include wound-related complications, while secondary outcomes include postoperative fever, endometritis, wound infection, and white blood cell count.

This study is evaluating whether Steri-Strips® provide additional benefits when used after cesarean section (C-section) surgery. Steri-Strips are adhesive strips that are commonly placed over a surgical incision to provide support while the wound heals. At our hospital, Steri-Strips are routinely used after C-sections in addition to standard wound closure techniques, although they are not considered part of the standard recommended closure method. Researchers want to determine whether adding Steri-Strips actually reduces wound complications such as infection, fluid collection under the skin, or reopening of the incision. Previous studies have shown mixed results, with some suggesting little difference in wound healing outcomes while others reported differences in scar appearance. Steri-Strips may also increase costs, add time to the surgery, and occasionally cause skin irritation or allergic reactions. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive standard cesarean wound closure with Steri-Strips, while the other group will receive standard wound closure without Steri-Strips. Researchers will compare wound healing, complications, patient outcomes, and costs between the two groups. The goal of this study is to determine whether Steri-Strips improve recovery after cesarean delivery and whether their routine use is beneficial and cost-effective. The findings may help guide future recommendations for cesarean wound care and improve outcomes for patients undergoing C-section delivery.

This study aims to compare the effect of ondansetron lozenge and intravenous for prevention of shivering in cesarean section (CS).

Some patients who undergo cesarean section under spinal or epidural anesthesia can experience severe pain. Some patients who experience this kind of pain can experience symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after pregnancy. Currently, the two main options for treating this pain are general anesthesia (full medically induced unconsciousness) and using intravenous medications to reduce the pain and decrease anxiety. The EAGLET-CS Pilot is a pilot randomized trial that will test the feasibility of comparing the impact of these two options for preventing PTSD in a rigorous way for those patients who experience pain during their cesarean section after the baby is out.

During standard cesarean deliveries, there are two ways that obstetricians repair the incision on the uterus (hysterotomy after delivery of the baby. One method involves lifting the uterus out of its regular place in the abdomen to repair the incision (uterine exteriorization for repair). The second method involves leaving the uterus inside the abdomen to repair the uterus (in situ repair). Both of these methods are regularly used by obstetricians during cesarean deliveries, and it is not currently known if one has benefits over the other. Currently, surgeons use both methods, but lifting the uterus out of its place is slightly more common. In this study, participants will be randomly assigned to have one of these techniques performed during their surgery. Researchers will be investigating whether one technique or the other leads to better contraction of the uterus after delivery, less bleeding, less intra-operative nausea/vomiting, or a better patient experience than another.

This single-center randomized controlled clinical trial will evaluate the effects of structured early postpartum mother-infant skin-to-skin contact, with or without maternal lavender aromatherapy, after elective cesarean section on maternal stress biomarkers and early breastfeeding outcomes. The study will enroll 150 term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at Ataturk University Research Hospital. Participants will be randomized into three groups: routine postoperative care, structured skin-to-skin contact, and structured skin-to-skin contact combined with inhalational lavender aromatherapy. The primary outcome is the change in maternal salivary cortisol level from immediately after birth to 60 minutes postpartum. Secondary outcomes include maternal salivary IgA levels, state anxiety scores, postoperative pain and nausea, time to first analgesic requirement, early breastfeeding initiation and success, LATCH scores, neonatal axillary temperature, cumulative duration and continuity of skin-to-skin contact, maternal satisfaction, and the need for mother-infant separation within the first 2 hours postpartum.

Using spinal or epidural anesthesia (known as neuraxial blocks) is the gold standard for pain control during childbirth, especially in cesarean sections (C-sections). However, many women experience moderate to severe pain after a C-section, which can affect both their physical and emotional well-being, and even impact their ability to care for their newborn. Unfortunately, this pain is often not treated effectively, which can lead to increased sensitivity to pain or even chronic postoperative pain. One effective way to manage this pain is by giving opioids directly into the spinal fluid (subarachnoid space). This method allows doctors to use much smaller doses than would be needed if the same medication were given through a vein, which also helps avoid many of the common side effects of opioids like respiratory depression, nausea, pruritus, and constipation. Common opioids used in this setting include fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine. These drugs behave differently depending on their chemical properties. For example, drugs that are more fat-soluble work faster, while those that are less fat-soluble tend to last longer. Morphine, which is less fat-soluble than the others, provides strong and long-lasting pain relief. When injected spinally, its effect can last 18-24 hours, with the pain relief starting 1-2 hours after the injection. Its performance is comparable to that of epidural anesthesia or nerve blocks. Researchers have studied a wide range of spinal morphine doses (from 20 to 500 micrograms) to find the most effective and safest dose. Most of these studies are small or use set doses without clear reasoning. Recently, a method called sequential allocation has become popular for finding the best dose more accurately. About the Study This research aims to find the ideal dose of spinal morphine when it's given with a fixed amount of fentanyl and varying doses of ropivacaine (a local anesthetic) during spinal anesthesia for C-section in healthy full-term parturients. The goal is to find the dose that provides adequate analgesia (pain score under 3 out of 10) for at least 12 hours after surgery. This is a prospective, non-randomized, double-blind study. The study follows ethical standards and all participants sign an informed consent form. Two anesthesiologists are involved in each case: one handles the spinal injection and dose decision (based on the previous patient's response), while the other monitors the patient and collects the data without knowing the dose used. Anesthetic Technique Spinal anesthesia is done using standard procedures. A very fine needle (25 or 27 gauge) is used to inject a mixture of fentanyl (15 mcg), a variable dose of ropivacaine (based on somatometrics), and a variable dose of morphine (based on the algorithm). The mixture is injected slowly (1 ml every 10 seconds), with the needle facing toward the head. After surgery, all women receive additional pain medications like paracetamol and NSAIDs as part of a multimodal pain relief approach. How the Morphine Dose is Decided The dose of morphine changes based on whether the previous participant had effective pain relief. Pain relief is considered successful if the pain score stays at or below 3 (on a 0-10 scale) for at least 12 hours after the spinal injection. For the first woman in the study, the starting dose is chosen based on published research. Then: * If the previous participant had good pain control (NRS ≤3 for 12 hours), the dose for the next woman is reduced by 20 micrograms. * If pain control was poor (NRS \>3 within the first 12 hours), the dose is increased by 40 micrograms. This up-and-down adjustment continues for each new participant.