Disorders of Consciousness Due to Severe Brain Injury

Effective treatment options for disorders of consciousness (DoC) remain limited, and available interventions show heterogeneous efficacy. To date, limited evidences support the use of amantadine and transcranial direct current stimulation in this population. Bloodletting puncture (BP) at the hand twelve Jing-Well points (HTWPs) has been traditionally used in China as an empirical therapy for DoC; however, its efficacy has not been established by robust clinical evidence. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) provides a modern, noninvasive alternative for acupoint stimulation. The Wells-DoC trial, a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study with blinded endpoint assessment, provided preliminary evidence that TEAS applied at the hand twelve Jing-Well points was associated with a numerically higher proportion of consciousness improvement in patients with DoC, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. These findings support the need for further evaluation in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial. The Wells-DoC II trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEAS at the twelve Jing-Well points of the hand in patients with DoC. The primary objective of the Wells-DoC II trial is to determine whether TEAS applied at the twelve Jing-Well points of the hand improves consciousness in adults with DoC. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving consciousness improvement after 14 consecutive days of treatment, compared between the TEAS group and the sham stimulation (placebo control) group. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of TEAS versus sham stimulation on: (1) changes in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores at 7 and 14 days; (2) change in ABCD model classification at day 14; and (3) functional outcomes measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at 3 and 6 months after enrollment. A total of 160 patients will be recruited over a 28-month period.

Some patients with severe traumatic brain injury cannot respond at the bedside, yet about 1 in 4 may be aware but unable to show it - a hidden state called cognitive motor dissociation. This study tests a gentle, non-invasive treatment delivered through clips on the left ear that stimulates two nerves at once: the vagus nerve at the inner ear (taVNS) and the trigeminal nerve at the outer ear (taTNS). Each nerve has separately been shown to help people with disorders of consciousness recover, but they have not been combined before. All enrolled patients receive the stimulation for one hour a day, with continuous heart and oxygen monitoring and a pain-protection check used to keep the dose safe. The study measures recovery two ways: the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), scored by clinicians, and SeeMe, an automated camera system that detects tiny command-driven movements the eye cannot see.

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether walking with an overground robotic exoskeleton (ORE) can improve responsiveness and brain activity in adults with disorders of consciousness (DoC) during inpatient rehabilitation after a severe brain injury. Participants include adults ages 18-70 who are in a coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or minimally conscious state and are receiving rehabilitation care at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does using an ORE improve behavioral responsiveness compared with lying down, sitting, or standing? * Does using an ORE increase brain activity, and are changes in brain activity related to changes in responsiveness? * Is ORE therapy safe, tolerable, and feasible for people with DoC during inpatient rehabilitation? Researchers will compare participants' responses during sessions involving lying down, sitting, standing, and walking with the robotic exoskeleton to see if the exoskeleton leads to greater improvements in responsiveness and brain activity. Participants will: * Complete an initial screening session to determine whether they can safely use the robotic exoskeleton. * Participate in six study sessions over about two weeks during their rehabilitation stay. During these sessions, participants will complete activities that may include lying down, sitting, standing, and walking with a robotic exoskeleton. The order of activities will be assigned at random. * Have their level of responsiveness measured before and after each session using a standardized assessment called the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). * Wear a wireless EEG cap before, during, and after sessions so researchers can measure brain activity. * Have their heart rate and safety monitored throughout the study sessions.

The main questions this study aims to answer are: Can low-intensity FUS neuromodulation be safely and feasibly administered to the bilateral central thalamus in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC)? Does FUS neuromodulation result in short-term improvements in arousal or behavioral responsiveness? Does FUS neuromodulation produce measurable changes in neural activity on EEG and/or fMRI? Participants will: Receive two sessions of low-intensity FUS neuromodulation, spaced four weeks apart, plus or minus one week. Undergo pre- and post-treatment assessments, including planning CT, MRI/fMRI, EEG, and standardized clinical scales such as the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Be continuously monitored for safety during and after each FUS treatment. Complete follow-up imaging and clinical assessments approximately 2 weeks after each FUS session, 12 weeks after the second treatment, and at 12 months post-injury when clinically feasible.

The overall aim of this study is to develop an intervention that can help recovery in patients surviving severe brain injury but failing to fully recover. In particular, this project aims to (1) determine neurobehavioral responses to low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following brain injury, (2) determine neurophysiologic (EEG) responses to LIFUP in patients with DoC and (3) identify and evaluate ethical perspectives of patient representatives (family members and surrogate decision-makers) surrounding investigation of therapeutic neuromodulation technologies such as LIFUP in patients with DoC.

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) can measure brain activity in healthy adults and in people with disorders of consciousness (DoC) in the neuro-intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU). DoC include conditions such as coma and minimally conscious state that occur after severe brain injury. These conditions make it difficult to assess a person's level of awareness because many clinical tests rely on observable behaviors such as speaking or moving, which are commonly impaired after brain injury. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Can fNIRS detect changes in brain activity in healthy adults when they receive sensory stimulation or perform mental tasks? * Can the same fNIRS protocol be used in patients with disorders of consciousness in the Neuro-ICU to measure brain responses and determine whether the method is feasible in this clinical setting? The investigators will first study healthy adult volunteers to establish baseline brain responses and determine which tasks produce the most reliable signals. The protocol will then be applied to patients with disorders of consciousness admitted to the Neuro-ICU. Participants will take part in a single research session lasting about 30 to 45 minutes while wearing the lightweight fNIRS headband that measures brain oxygen levels using near-infrared light. During the session, participants will: * Wear a non-invasive fNIRS headband placed on the forehead * Receive gentle sensory stimulation (for example, compression devices on the legs or hands) * Listen to sounds or spoken sentences * Perform guided mental tasks such as imagining walking through their home or imagining moving a limb The study does not test a treatment and will not change medical care. The goal is to determine whether fNIRS can safely and reliably measure brain activity at the bedside and provide preliminary information that may help guide future research on improving the assessment of consciousness after brain injury.

The overall aim of this study is to develop an intervention that can help recovery in patients surviving severe brain injury but failing to fully recover. In particular, this multicenter project aims to (1) establish short-term efficacy of tFUS as a therapeutic to promote recovery in patients with prolonged DoC as compared to sham treatment, (2) establish dose-related safety and efficacy of tFUS as a therapeutic intervention in prolonged DoC patients and (3) explore preliminary predictors and biomarkers of susceptibility and response to thalamic sonication.

By collecting multimodal metrics (e.g., clinical factors, neuroimaging, and EEG) in the early phase of severe brain injury (i.e., during the acute hospitalization when a patient has impaired consciousness), and measuring the patients' recovery of consciousness, function, and quality of life in the late phase (at 6 months following the brain injury), we aim to construct an algorithm that synthesizes the results of these metrics to help predict recovery.

Accurately determining the level of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury is essential for treatment planning, prognosis, and ethical decision-making. Clinically, levels of consciousness are differentiated into coma, Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS), and Minimally Conscious State (MCS) based on behavioral signs. Although behavioral assessment is considered the clinical gold standard, it is prone to misclassification. Research has shown that a substantial proportion of patients initially diagnosed with UWS may actually show signs of minimal consciousness, which is associated with better cognitive abilities and a more favorable prognosis. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is internationally recommended for diagnosing disorders of consciousness, but it is time-consuming and not free from diagnostic error. Repeated assessments can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. To enhance feasibility in routine clinical practice, a shorter and more time-efficient assessment tool, the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs), was developed. This scale focuses on the behavioral signs most strongly associated with MCS and uses optimized testing procedures while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study is to further evaluate diagnostic approaches for assessing consciousness in patients with severe brain injury and to improve the reliability and clinical applicability of these assessments.

The goal of this observational study is to determine whether the clinical response to olfactory stimulation (known as the "sniff" response) can help predict 3-month neurological outcomes in ICU patients with persistent disorders of consciousness after sedation withdrawal, regardless of the reason for admission or the initial severity. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Can the "sniff" response to olfactory stimulation predict neurological outcomes at 3 months? * Is this response a better prognostic indicator than commonly used neurophysiological tests? Researchers will compare the results obtained from olfactory stimulation with those from somatosensory and auditory stimulations to determine whether the olfactory method provides additional or superior prognostic value. Participants will receive additional olfactory stimuli as part of the neurophysiological evaluation for prognostic purposes and be followed up at 3 months for clinical, neurological, and functional evaluation

The goal of this observation study is to learn about the prediction value of combined electroencephalographic and electromyographic response in disorders of consciousness. The main ways of stimulation is thermal and itch. Six months after inclusion in the study, patients were classified according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, (GOSE).