Drug Resistance, Bacterial

This is a prospective, single-arm, observational, exploratory clinical study to evaluate whether the standard fixed dose of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) achieves sufficient drug exposure (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, or PK/PD targets) in patients with blood cancers (or those undergoing stem cell transplantation). Patients with hematological malignancies are at high risk for severe, drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections due to weakened immune systems. CAZ-AVI is a critical antibiotic used to treat these infections. However, there is limited evidence on whether the standard recommended dose achieves adequate drug concentrations for both ceftazidime and avibactam simultaneously in this specific patient group, and whether low drug exposure drives the development of antibiotic resistance during treatment. This study will enroll 60 participants who are already prescribed CAZ-AVI by their treating physicians based on routine clinical needs. The study will not change or interfere with any clinical treatment decisions. To measure drug levels, 5 small blood samples (about 2-3 mL each) will be collected within one dosing interval after the drug reaches a steady level in the body (typically 48 to 72 hours after starting treatment). Microbiological samples (such as blood cultures or swabs) will also be collected at multiple time points to monitor bacterial clearance and detect any newly developed resistance. Participants will be followed up for clinical outcomes and survival status up to 30 days after the completion of treatment. The primary goal of this study is to determine the percentage of patients who achieve the target drug exposure for both ceftazidime and avibactam simultaneously. The secondary goals are to observe clinical cure rates, bacterial clearance rates, 30-day survival, and the rate of newly induced antibiotic resistance during therapy.

This study looks at how common certain antibiotic-resistant bacteria (called extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, or E-BLSE) are in pregnant women who experience premature breaking of their water before full term. The goal is to understand how often these bacteria are found, how long they stay, and what factors increase the risk of carrying them. This information will help doctors choose the best antibiotics to protect both the mother and baby from infections during and after pregnancy. The study follows women from the time of their membrane rupture until delivery, collecting samples to track the bacteria over time.

The aim of this research experiment is to evaluate the effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) preceded by antibiotic pre-treatment versus probiotic therapy and a standard-of-care equivalent diet designed to stimulate the growth of eubiotic gut microbiota (an active comparator enhancing the ethical value of the study and increasing the chances of spontaneous decolonization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) in the absence of any active intervention recommended by Scientific Societies) in the decolonization of bacteria with the most clinically significant antibiotic resistance mechanisms from the gastrointestinal tract of colonized patients. This study addresses the urgent need highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO) for new strategies to combat antibiotic resistance, aiming to prevent its progression into a global pandemic that could undermine the achievements of modern civilization. Study Hypotheses: * The decolonization rate of ARB bacteria in patients undergoing the intervention (FMT or probiotic therapy) is the same as in patients treated with standard-of-care (SoC) alone. * The decolonization rate of ARB bacteria in the intervention groups (FMT or probiotic therapy) is at least 20 percentage points higher than in patients treated with the standard approach (diet). The findings from this study may contribute to developing innovative microbiota-based therapies for the decolonization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and help reduce the global burden of antibiotic resistance.

This study looks at how different antibiotic treatments affect patients in intensive care who have pneumonia caused by the bacteria Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. It compares using one antibiotic versus two antibiotics, and treatment lengths of 7 days versus 14 days, to see which approach helps patients survive better. The study also examines how resistant the bacteria are to antibiotics and how often the pneumonia comes back.