Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

The INITIATE-HF study is a cluster randomized controlled trial that aims to find out if reminding doctors about treatment guidelines for iron deficiency in adults with heart failure who are hospitalized and have evidence of iron deficiency changes the subsequent use of intravenous (IV) iron. Two groups of hospitalized adult patients with known heart failure and iron deficiency will be compared: * Group 1 will include doctors who receive a notification with their patient's iron storage test results and guideline recommendations related to the use of IV iron. * Group 2 will include doctors who do not receive this notification and continue with usual standard of care. The study will measure if this provider-facing notification affects physician use of recommended IV iron treatment in eligible patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%, and iron deficiency. Secondarily, if there is an increased use of IV iron observed in the intervention group, this study will evaluate whether there are differential health outcomes (i.e., fewer subsequent hospital visits and lower risk of death) of patients whose providers were assigned to the intervention group.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if tirzepatide works to improve physical function in adults with heart failure and obesity. It will also learn about the safety of tirzepatide. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does tirzepatide improve how far participants can walk in 6 minutes? Does tirzepatide improve heart failure symptoms and quality of life? What side effects do participants have when taking tirzepatide? Researchers will compare tirzepatide to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if tirzepatide improves physical function in people with heart failure and obesity. Participants will: Get a weekly injection of tirzepatide or a placebo under the skin for 6 months Start at a low dose, which may be raised slowly based on how well they tolerate it Keep taking their usual heart failure medicines Visit the clinic for checkups, blood tests, heart ultrasounds, and a 6-minute walk test Answer questions about their quality of life and heart failure symptoms

This study will evaluate the V-Wave Ventura Interatrial shunt. The Shunt is a small, hourglass-shaped device implanted in the dividing wall (septum) between the right and left atria (top chambers) of the heart placed during a minimally invasive cardiac catheterization procedure. The hourglass shape of the device holds the Shunt in place. The small opening in the center allows a small amount of blood to flow (to be shunted) from the top left chamber to the top right chamber of the heart. By "shunting" this small amount of blood, the increased pressure in the left side of the heart is reduced, which is expected to reduce congestion in the lungs and improve your symptoms of heart failure. A previous study, the REducing Lung congestIon symptoms using the v-wavE shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure (RELIEVE-HF) trial showed that implantation of an interatrial shunt device was safe. In that study, patients whose heart pumping function (left ventricular ejection fraction, or LVEF) was \>40% did not have better HF outcomes, such as hospitalization or even death after getting the device. However, the study looked separately at the LVEF ≤40% group and found that patients with an LVEF ≤40% showed improvements in these HF outcomes, as well as fewer episodes of worsening HF requiring an artificial heart pump. This suggests the shunt may help people whose heart pump is reduced, but more information is needed. The purpose of this study is to add to the data on the safety and whether the shunt works in preventing worsening heart failure for patients with reduced pumping strength or LVEF ≤40% . This study is a multi-center, randomized, patient and observer blinded trial, with three (3) patients randomized to received the shunt (Treatment arm) for every two (2) non-implant Placebo-Procedure (Control patients). A total of approximately 250 patients will be randomized. Patients and research staff managing patients after randomization will be blinded during follow-up for a minimum of 12 months to a maximum of 24 months. All patients (Randomized to Treatment and Control) will be followed for a total of 3 years from the time of the randomization for comparison. Follow-up visits will be performed for the study will be conducted in clinic with the research doctors and staff and will include some telephone/remote visits. Patients randomized to the Control group who still meet inclusion/without exclusion criteria and consent will have an opportunity to receive the shunt if the effectiveness endpoint is met at primary study results.

Heart failure is a serious condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively. Some patients with severe heart failure (known as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or HFrEF) can experience significant improvement in their heart function after receiving guideline-directed medical therapy. This phenomenon is called heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). However, it is not fully understood why some patients improve while others do not. This study aims to explore the molecular mechanisms behind this improvement by collecting blood samples and clinical data from patients with HFrEF in China. Participants will be followed for 12 months, and their heart function will be assessed at multiple time points. By analyzing blood biomarkers and imaging data, researchers hope to identify predictors of heart function improvement and develop a model to help personalize treatment for heart failure patients. This is an observational study, meaning participants will receive their usual medical care and no experimental treatments or medications will be given. The study involves regular clinical visits and blood draws as part of routine care.

With the advancement of wearable technology, continuous non-invasive monitoring of vital signs, arrhythmia burden, and physical status has become increasingly feasible. Devices such as smartwatches and electrocardiogram (ECG) straps can provide real-time physiological data, offering new opportunities for remote and proactive disease management. Despite the growing availability of such real-time data, the complex interaction between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) necessitates highly personalized management. However, there remains a lack of high-quality clinical evidence on how to effectively integrate wearable device data into these personalized strategies for specific patient populations. Moreover, the prognostic impact of wearable device-assisted remote management has not been comprehensively evaluated. Therefore, robust clinical studies are needed to further evaluate whether wearable device-assisted remote monitoring can improve the long-term prognosis of this population after discharge from the cardiac care unit (CCU). In this study (WARM-HF Stage 2), the investigators will conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine whether wearable devices can reduce the composite endpoint of readmission or death in patients with HF.

Advanced heart failure, affecting 7 million Americans, has multiple causes and results in greatly increased risk of disability and death. A major problem is sudden cardiac death, when the damaged heart develops an abnormal pattern of electrical conduction that can result in cessation of heart activity. While placement of an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) in a patient's chest can help prevent sudden cardiac death, these devices have several important downsides. This protocol focuses on development of a digital decision aid that helps heart failure patients make informed decisions that balance the benefits and downsides of ICD placement. This protocol covers the use of participant surveys, focus groups, and interviews to obtain the needed background information to guide the development of this digital tool, which will be subsequently tested against usual care in a randomized clinical trial. The study design is best described as a mixed methods evaluation and refinement of a digital app to improve ICD decision-making. In the future, the present protocol will be modified to create a new protocol that covers the needed human subjects requirements for performance of this clinical trial.

To evaluate the effect of accelerated atrial resynchronization achieved through Bachmann bundle pacing at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and interatrial block

Heart failure is a serious condition in which the heart is unable to pump blood effectively, and it remains a leading cause of hospitalization and death worldwide despite advances in treatment. Selenium is an essential micronutrient that plays an important role in cellular energy production, antioxidant defense, and overall cardiovascular function. Low selenium levels are common among patients with heart failure in Northern Europe, and observational studies have shown that selenium deficiency is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death. In cases of severe deficiency, such as in Keshan disease, heart dysfunction can be reversed with selenium supplementation, suggesting a potential causal relationship. However, it is not yet known whether selenium supplementation can improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure when added to standard medical therapy. The SIRI-HF trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate whether daily supplementation with 200 micrograms of selenium, in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy, improves outcomes in patients with heart failure. The primary endpoint is a composite of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death. Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, changes in symptoms and functional status, and safety outcomes. This study will include patients from Sweden and Norway and aims to determine whether correcting selenium deficiency can improve prognosis in heart failure.

The purpose of this prospective, multi-center, propensity-matched coverage with evidence development (CED) study is to assess the impact of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in Medicare-eligible patients with heart failure who meet indications for CCM.

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out which type of specialist pacemaker-known as cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT)-works best for people with heart failure and a delay in how the lower chambers of the heart beat together (called electrical dyssynchrony). The main aims of the study are: To compare the effects of conventional biventricular pacing (BVP), conduction system pacing (CSP) and left-bundle optimised CRT (LOT-CRT) on heart failure symptoms and heart rhythm problems over six months. To explore how these pacing methods affect heart muscle strength, electrical activity, and overall heart function. Participants will: Attend four hospital visits over a six-month period. At Visit 1, meet a member of the research team to discuss the study and have screening tests to check eligibility. Participants will also have a smartphone app installed and receive training on how to record their daily heart failure symptoms. At Visit 2, have a CRT pacemaker implanted. The type of pacemaker will be chosen at random, with a 1 in 3 chance of receiving: * Biventricular pacing (BVP); the current standard treatment * Conduction system pacing (CSP) * LOT-CRT (Left-bundle optimised CRT); a combination of both At Visit 3 (around 12 weeks after implantation) and Visit 4 (6 months after implantation), take part in routine follow-up assessments to check the pacemaker and heart function. At Visits 2 and 4, also undergo non-invasive electrical mapping tests, including wearing a specialised vest and having a low-dose CT scan of the chest. These tests help researchers understand how the heart's electrical system responds to different pacing methods.

This is a multi-center, prospective, observational study designed to evaluate the impact of LV myocardial fibrosis extent assessed by CMR on LV reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes post TEER. The target sample will be up to 125 patients enrolled to achieve 100 evaluable at 6 months of follow-up. Enrollment will occur at up to eight centers.

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) constitutes of four medications that substantially reduce morbidity and mortality, and improve quality of life. In routine clinical practice, various physician- and patient-related factors lead to suboptimal initiation and uptitration of GDMT to optimal dosing, which is associated with worse patient outcomes. A perceived major barrier to the optimalization of GDMT are changes in kidney function and electrolytes, which prompts physicians to halt uptitration, reduce doses, or even discontinue GDMT. Changes in kidney function and electrolytes during optimalization of GDMT are common, but not associated with adverse events. The hypothesis of this study is that a reduction in the number of kidney function assessments during initiation and uptitration of GDMT in HFrEF patients will lead to higher achieved doses of GDMT without safety concerns.