Wearable Device-Assisted Remote Management to Improve Prognosis in Patients With Acute Heart Failure Complicated by Atrial Fibrillation: WARM-HF Trial (Stage 2)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorBeijing Anzhen Hospital

About this trial

With the advancement of wearable technology, continuous non-invasive monitoring of vital signs, arrhythmia burden, and physical status has become increasingly feasible. Devices such as smartwatches and electrocardiogram (ECG) straps can provide real-time physiological data, offering new opportunities for remote and proactive disease management. Despite the growing availability of such real-time data, the complex interaction between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) necessitates highly personalized management. However, there remains a lack of high-quality clinical evidence on how to effectively integrate wearable device data into these personalized strategies for specific patient populations. Moreover, the prognostic impact of wearable device-assisted remote management has not been comprehensively evaluated. Therefore, robust clinical studies are needed to further evaluate whether wearable device-assisted remote monitoring can improve the long-term prognosis of this population after discharge from the cardiac care unit (CCU).

In this study (WARM-HF Stage 2), the investigators will conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine whether wearable devices can reduce the composite endpoint of readmission or death in patients with HF.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years;

Disqualifiers

Intolerance to heart failure pharmacotherapy;

Severe anemia or untreated thyroid disease;

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 3 months;

Known complex congenital heart disease; infiltrative cardiomyopathy (such as cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or endomyocardial fibrosis); myocarditis; constrictive pericarditis; cardiac tamponade; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; stress cardiomyopathy; or uncorrected primary valvular heart disease requiring surgical interventions;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • wearable device based remote management (GDMT titration for HF, rhythm control and anticoagulation management for AF)

    Drug

    Participants in the intervention group will be managed per current guidelines for heart failure (HF) and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). The intervention group uses real-time data for automatic triage, categorized into three subgroups: Normal subgroup: Upward titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Abnormal subgroup: Upward/downward GDMT titration, or volume/congestion management (dyspnea/edema) - diuretics titrated to 100% target dose or other diuretics added. Grade E alert subgroup: Emergency department (ED) or outpatient clinic visit. Efforts to maintain sinus rhythm are recommended; rate control strategies are at the discretion of physicians. Anticoagulation will be initiated, if not already started, and maintained throughout the study according to current guidelines.

Treatment groups

818 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Wearable Device-Assisted Intervention GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Usual CareNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Composite outcome of death or HF hospitalization

Time frame
2 years after randomization

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in GDMT score

The GDMT(guideline-directed medical therapy) score is a scoring system according to the combination of GDMT drugs administration and their dosages. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors were scored 0 if not initiated, 1 if \<50% of target dose, and 2 if 50-100% of target dose; ARNIs were scored 3 regardless of dose; BBs were scored 0 if not initiated, 1 if \<50% of target dose, and 2 if 50-100% of target dose; and MRAs and SGLT2 inhibitors were scored 0 if not initiated and 2 if initiated regardless of dose. MRAs and SGLT2 inhibitors were scored 0 if not initiated and 2 if initiated regardless of dose, resulting in a total score of 0-9. The higher score indicated better implementation of GDMT therapy.

Time frame
90 days after randomization
2

NT-proBNP measures

Time frame
2 years after randomization
3

Cardiovascular death

Time frame
2 years after randomization
4

Stroke

Time frame
2 years after randomization

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: