Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, which may delay mobilization, increase opioid consumption, and impair functional recovery. Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) is widely used as part of multimodal analgesia because it provides effective analgesia while preserving quadriceps muscle strength. However, ACB alone may provide insufficient analgesia for the posterior aspect of the knee. The biceps femoris short head (BiFeS) block is a novel ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique targeting the posterolateral sensory innervation of the knee and may enhance postoperative analgesia when combined with ACB. However, clinical evidence regarding its analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty remains limited. This prospective, randomized, controlled trial aims to compare postoperative analgesia between ultrasound-guided adductor canal block alone and adductor canal block combined with a biceps femoris short head block in adult patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ACB alone or combined ACB plus BiFeS block. The primary outcome is cumulative opioid consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity, time to first analgesic request, quadriceps muscle strength, functional recovery, postoperative recovery quality, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient and surgeon satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and block-related complications.

This prospective, randomized, open-label, single-centre post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study evaluates the clinical performance and safety of a single intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared with a single intra-articular injection of HA alone in adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III). Knee osteoarthritis is a chronic degenerative joint disease associated with pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life. Hyaluronic acid is widely used as viscosupplementation therapy, while platelet-rich plasma provides autologous growth factors that may contribute to the modulation of inflammatory processes and tissue healing. The combination of HA and PRP may provide complementary effects and may offer additional clinical benefit compared with HA alone. A total of 50 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single intra-articular injection of 3.8 mL HA combined with 1 mL autologous PRP or a single intra-articular injection of 4.8 mL HA. Participants will be followed for 18 months. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in the change in knee pain, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), from baseline to Month 6. Secondary outcomes include changes in pain intensity, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), quality-of-life measures, and safety assessments throughout the follow-up period. Both medical devices are CE-marked and are used for their intended purpose. The study is conducted as a PMCF investigation in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR).

This prospective, randomized, open-label, single-centre post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study evaluates the clinical performance and safety of a single intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared with a single intra-articular injection of HA alone in adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III). Knee osteoarthritis is a chronic degenerative joint disease associated with pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life. Hyaluronic acid is widely used as viscosupplementation therapy, while platelet-rich plasma provides autologous growth factors that may contribute to the modulation of inflammatory processes and tissue healing. The combination of HA and PRP may provide complementary effects and may offer additional clinical benefit compared with HA alone. A total of 50 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single intra-articular injection of 3.8 mL HA combined with 1 mL autologous PRP or a single intra-articular injection of 4.8 mL HA. Participants will be followed for 18 months. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in knee pain measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to Month 6. Secondary outcomes include changes in pain intensity, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), quality of life measures, and safety assessments throughout the follow-up period. Both medical devices are CE-marked and are used for their intended purpose. The study is conducted as a PMCF investigation in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR).

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the addition of manual traction to a standard rehabilitation protocol improves early recovery after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in women aged 50-75 years with knee osteoarthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the addition of manual traction reduce postoperative pain during the first four weeks after TKA? * Does manual traction improve physical function, knee range of motion, patient-reported knee function, and health-related quality of life compared with standard rehabilitation alone? * Does manual traction reduce the need for analgesic medication during the early postoperative rehabilitation period? Researchers will compare participants receiving manual traction plus standard rehabilitation with participants receiving sham traction plus the same standard rehabilitation protocol to determine whether manual traction provides additional clinical benefits during early rehabilitation after TKA. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to either the manual traction group or the sham traction (control) group. * Receive a standardized rehabilitation program for four weeks after surgery, with the intervention group receiving manual traction and the control group receiving sham traction. * Attend supervised rehabilitation sessions five times per week throughout the four-week intervention period. * Complete validated questionnaires assessing pain, knee function, joint awareness, and health-related quality of life at predefined assessment time points. * Undergo standardized clinical assessments of knee range of motion and physical function before surgery, before rehabilitation, during follow-up, and one month after surgery. * Have their analgesic medication use recorded throughout the rehabilitation period.

Osteoarthritis (OA) stands out as the most prevalent joint disease. It manifests as a progressive degradation of articular cartilage, new bone growth and often synovial tissue proliferation, resulting in pain and compromised joint functionality, ultimately leading to disability. Misalignment of the lower limb (varus or valgus knees) are recognised as a risk factor for osteoarthritis onset and progression. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a surgical technique that allows to shift the load from the affected area to other areas with intact cartilage. Similarly to HTO, braces realign the lower limb, without the need for surgical intervention. These corrective treatments are recommended for the youngest group of patients as it allows them to stay active, as opposed to Total Knee Replacement (TKR). Until today, the effects of braces and HTO on the subchondral bone microstructure and cartilage are not well understood. Investigating these aspects to better understand treatment failures is becoming more and more crucial because global prevalence of knee OA is expected to increase with the ageing of populations.

The purpose of this clinical study is to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating people who have excess body weight and knee osteoarthritis. There are 2 study treatments in this study taken as injections under the skin once a week. Participants will either get NNC0487-0111 (the treatment being tested) or Placebo (a treatment that has no active medicine in it). Which treatment participants get is decided by chance.

The goal of this study is to create a prospective registry (\<100 patients) to show the effectiveness of the genicular artery embolization procedure overtime in reducing bilateral or unilateral osteoarthritic knee pain as measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether performing total knee replacement surgery (total knee arthroplasty, TKA) without a tourniquet is clinically equivalent to performing the procedure with a tourniquet in adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. A tourniquet is commonly used during surgery to reduce bleeding and improve the surgeon's view. However, some studies suggest it may be associated with certain complications. It is currently unclear whether using a tourniquet meaningfully changes outcomes compared to not using one. This study aims to assess whether both approaches result in similar outcomes within a clinically acceptable range. The main question this study aims to answer is: Is total blood loss during surgery equivalent between TKA performed with a tourniquet and TKA performed without a tourniquet, within a predefined margin of ±100 mL? Additional questions include: Are surgical field quality, postoperative pain, functional recovery, and complication rates comparable between the two techniques? Researchers will compare: TKA performed with a pneumatic tourniquet TKA performed without a tourniquet to determine whether outcomes between the two approaches are equivalent rather than whether one is superior to the other. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical groups using a computer-generated process Undergo standard total knee replacement surgery and routine perioperative care Have blood loss assessed during and after surgery Be monitored for pain, recovery of function, wound healing, and complications during hospital stay and follow-up visits This study is designed as a randomized controlled equivalence trial to determine whether both surgical approaches produce comparable outcomes within clinically acceptable limits, in a standardized local setting.

Kinesitherapy is one of the main tools in the rehabilitation of knee osteoarthritis, but is often limited due to pain, reduced functionality, and fear of falling in older adults. This study will, through three sub-studies, examine the effects of unilateral training programs on strength, movement control, balance, and pain in the contralateral leg, as well as on functionality, fall risk, and kinesiophobia in older adults with bilateral knee osteoarthritis through three sub-studies. A total of 45 participants (aged 60-80 years) with bilateral knee osteoarthritis will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1. combined unilateral strength and balance training; 2. unilateral balance training; 3. unilateral strength training. Strength will be measured with maximal voluntary contraction, balance using a single leg stance test on an unstable surface, movement control with an active joint position reproduction test, and functionality using the six-minute walk test and the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. Pain will be assessed with the Visual Analog Scale and the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain questionnaire, fall risk with the Timed Up and Go test and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International questionnaire, and kinesiophobia using the TAMPA questionnaire. This study will expand knowledge on cross-transfer and its effects on symptoms in the rehabilitation of older adults with bilateral knee osteoarthritis. This research is a part of a doctoral thesis conducted under the supervision of assoc. prof. Tatjana Trošt, PhD.

The goal of this observational study is to look at inter-individual differences in knee osteoarthritis (OA) walking pain and performance. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Why do some people with knee osteoarthritis have more severe disabling pain than others, even though the degenerative changes in their knees are similar? What are the factors that contribute to walking pain in people with knee osteoarthritis? Participants will complete surveys, perform physical function tasks, get a knee X-ray and MRI, undergo non-invasive brain imaging, and undergo sensory testing.

Our purpose is to expand upon the results of the pilot study performed at David Grant Medical Center (DGMC) which showed that concomitant non-steroidal NSAID use in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing a three-shot dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) injection series did not negate the efficacy of DPT. Additionally, it showed that giving both treatments simultaneously is safe and efficacious. The small sample size and design of the pilot study limited the conclusions that can be drawn on the concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during DPT treatment. This is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial that includes a subject population of males and females between the ages of 45-75 years who are DoD beneficiaries empaneled at DGMC with a history of chronic, symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in one or both knees, that meet study criteria. Participants will have study inclusion/exclusion and knee films (within the past 2 years) reviewed by a study investigator to confirm eligibility to participate in the study. Eligible participants will be consented then randomized into treatment groups (ibuprofen, placebo) by the pharmacy. Participants will provide a baseline assessment of pain and dysfunction using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. Participants will then have a series of three injections of 4mL of 25% dextrose mixed with 1% lidocaine into the knee under ultrasound guidance, performed at 0, 4 and 8 weeks (+/- 1 week) in addition to a 7-day supply of the study drug (ibuprofen, placebo) at these time points. NPRS and KOOS scores will be collected at 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. During the study period, participants will be counseled to avoid oral analgesics (other than what has been prescribed for them as part of the study) including NSAIDs, acetaminophen, or opioids, in addition to other procedures to treat their knee pain to include other injections, acupuncture, physical therapy, and surgery. The primary outcome is to determine the effect of concomitant oral ibuprofen vs. placebo use on intra-articular knee injections using hypertonic dextrose and the determine the short and long-term outcomes in each treatment group (ibuprofen, placebo) using the NPRS and KOOS questionnaires to assess pain and function.

The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of the 18-day balneotherapy program (therapeutic indication: Rheumatology) in terms of functional incapacity and the disorders (pain, joint stiffness) induced by osteoarthritis of the knee, and thus improves patients\&#39; quality of life, in patients presented with knee osteoarthritis. The French National Academy of Medicine encourages the re-use of RCT data when available. In this context, the current study is designed as a single-arm prospective study with external comparison using the propensity score. The Control group consists of the patients which were allocated to the Control group of reference randomized clinical trial (RCT) "ANGELLO Study" (NCT05819437). These patients received standard care for knee osteoarthritis, i.e., pain management and exercise recommendations. All patients enrolled in the current study benefit of 18-day balneotherapy program (therapeutic indication: Rheumatology) with Mineral Water of Santenay (Burgundy, France), and examination with a practitioner at enrollment and 6 months after the beginning of spa treatment.

Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Pain in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Study (SHAM-PAIN) is a NIH-NIAMS funded project designed to assess enrollment feasibility and detect any differences between GAE and a similar sham intervention in reducing KOA-related pain at 3 months as measured by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscore. Additionally, this study aims to determine the magnitude of difference in pain response between GAE and sham to adequately power a larger, more definitive randomized sham-controlled trial (RCT). The influence of psychosocial and psychocognitive factors, changes in analgesic use, and conditions of knee joint cartilage and effusion will similarly be explored to determine their impacts on perceived pain response to GAE.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is also known as degenerative joint disease, is typically the result of wear and tear and progressive loss of articular cartilage. It is most common in the elder population. It results from functional disability and altered knee biomechanics. Risk factors of Knee OA include; older age, genetics and obesity, female gender. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of core stabilization exercises versus foot-ankle strengthening program on pain, physical function and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

There has recently been considerable interest in the role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerves for KOA. In the majority of previous studies, ablation was done via a radiofrequency technique using either fluoroscopy or ultrasound for only three genicular nerves, whereas the knee joint is also supplied by a few other nerves (11, 12). Interestingly, neurolytic agents can also be used to ablate the nerves, and are readily available, less costly, and need less logistic support