Portal Hypertension

This study looks to gather data on hepatomiR, a CE-certified test already intended for gauging liver-related outcomes, in order to define a cut-off regarding specific decompensation events (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy) in chronic liver disease (CLD). Based on these data, it is aimed to advance the current understanding of factors driving decompensation, with potential repercussions for future risk management and therapy.

This clinical trial tests the how well an ultrasound with subharmonic imaging and the subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique works in identifying portal hypertension (PH). An ultrasound takes pictures of the inside of the body by bouncing sound waves off organs. PH is high blood pressure in the vein that carries blood to the liver from the stomach, small and large intestines, spleen, pancreas, and gallbladder. The complications associated with PH are clear only after severe liver dysfunction or liver cirrhosis develops and are accompanied by relatively high mortality rates (20-70% mortality within 2 years). Thus, identifying PH earlier is beneficial. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) obtained using an invasive catheterization procedure remains the standard for assessing PH. However, using this invasive procedure to assess PH prevents frequent pressure monitoring. Thus, a noninvasive technique to estimate PH is beneficial not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring treatment and disease progression. The SHAPE technique is a noninvasive ultrasound-based imaging technique that can estimate pressure with an ultrasound contrast agent. A noninvasive technique using an ultrasound with subharmonic imaging and the SHAPE technique may work in identifying PH.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if treating individuals living in Uganda who have liver fibrosis (scarring) due to schistosomiasis would benefit from more frequent treatment with drug praziquantel. This drug is already approved to treat schistosomiasis and is used globally. The study will include individuals who have schistosomiasis and some degree of liver fibrosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does treating participants three times per year as compared to once per year as currently recommended improve the likelihood the hepatic fibrosis will improve over three years. 2. Does treating participants three times per year as compared to once per year as currently recommended decrease the risk they have for bleeding due to portal hypertension over three years. 3. Is there a blood test that can tell us which individuals will experience worsening liver fibrosis before this happens. Participants will: Be screened for schistosomiasis using a urine test If participants have schistosomiasis they will undergo other screening procedures including a liver ultrasound, blood tests, and a physical exam if they have both schistosomiasis and liver (fibrosis) they will be invited to participate in the trial If they are in the trial they will: Take the drug praziquantel once per year or three times per year based on randomization for three years Have a liver ultrasound and blood samples for markers of liver fibrosis once per year Provide a urine sample to test for schistosomiasis each year

This study compares two endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments for gastric varices, which are enlarged veins in the stomach that can bleed. Both treatments use small coils placed into the varix. One group will receive coils with cyanoacrylate medical glue, and the other group will receive coils with absorbable gelatin sponge. The purpose of the study is to determine whether absorbable gelatin sponge with coils is not worse than cyanoacrylate glue with coils for closing off gastric varices, and to compare safety outcomes. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Participants and outcome assessors will not know which treatment was used, but the doctor performing the procedure will know. After the procedure, participants will be followed for up to 12 months. Follow-up may include clinical assessments, questionnaires about health and quality of life, CT imaging shortly after the procedure, and repeat endoscopic ultrasound assessments to evaluate whether the gastric varix has been successfully treated.

PORTAL-4D is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, parallel-group diagnostic study conducted at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France). Portal hypertension is the main driver of hepatic decompensation and is associated with ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and reduced survival. The current gold standard for assessing portal hypertension is the invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement performed via the transjugular route. However, HVPG is invasive, operator-dependent, and limited to specialized centers. A reliable non-invasive alternative is therefore highly needed. 60 adults patients with cirrhosis will be enrolled and divided into two parallel groups: MASLD group (n=24): Patients with compensated cirrhosis related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). TIPS group (n=36): Patients with decompensated cirrhosis referred for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. The primary objective is to assess the correlation between invasive HVPG values and 4D-flow MRI parameters. Secondary objectives include evaluating the prognostic value of 4D-flow MRI in predicting portal hypertension-related complications and post-TIPS outcomes within 6 months. The study is expected to validate 4D-flow MRI as an non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for portal hypertension, potentially improving patient selection for TIPS and reducing reliance on invasive procedures.

The objective of the study is to collect and evaluate clinical data on patients of the Lifetech Cera™ Vascular Plug System to: * confirm the performance * confirm the safety * identify previously unknown side-effects * monitor the identified side-effects (related to the procedures or to the medical devices) * identify and analyse emergent risks

The goal of this registry is to better understand how primary biliary cholangitis develops over time, including the role of disease-related biomarkers, complications of the disease, and symptom burden. Patients with primary biliary cholangitis treated at participating centres in Austria will be invited to take part in this prospective registry. Participation in an associated biobank is optional. Clinical and laboratory data will be collected, and patients will be followed regularly through scheduled clinic visits. In addition, biological samples (serum, plasma, and, if available, liver tissue) may be collected and stored in the biobank for future research.

Patients with liver cirrhosis often have impaired or at-risk kidney function due to the close link between liver and kidney (hepatorenal syndrome). Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection (LSD) is commonly used to treat Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Bleeding in these patients, but its impact on kidney function over 2 years is unclear. This study will follow patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy to measure changes in kidney function before and after surgery, identify risk factors for kidney damage and whether LSD can improve kidney function in the long term, and help improve care to protect kidney function in cirrhotic patients .

This study is a single-center, prospective cohort study based on real-world data. Patients with portal hypertension and esophagogastric varices were enrolled and divided into an endoscopic treatment group and a non-endoscopic treatment group (including patients receiving medical therapy, interventional procedures, or surgical treatment) according to whether they underwent endoscopic intervention. Baseline data, serum metabolites, CT imaging and endoscopic images, liver biopsy pathology, and other multi-omics data were integrated for both groups. Patients were followed up to compare adverse events after variceal treatment, including rebleeding and its causes, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, subsequent treatments (such as regular endoscopic therapy, NSSB, and TIPS), and survival outcomes. Clinical characteristics of portal hypertension attributed to different etiologies, including hepatitis B, autoimmune liver disease, schistosomiasis, hematological disorders, and chemotherapy-induced liver injury, were compared. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic and interventional treatments for esophagogastric varices were evaluated. Factors influencing rebleeding rates among different treatment groups were analyzed, and reasons for inclusion in different groups were discussed.

Patients with liver cirrhosis frequently exhibit dyslipidemia due to impaired hepatic lipid synthesis, altered bile acid metabolism, and portal hypertension. Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection (LSD) is commonly used to treat Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Bleeding in these patients, but its impact on lipid profiles over 2 years remains poorly characterized. This study will follow patients undergoing LSD to measure changes in serum lipid parameters before and after surgery, identify risk factors for lipid profile deterioration or improvement, and determine whether LSD can ameliorate dyslipidemia in the long term, thereby informing metabolic management strategies in cirrhotic patients.

Variceal bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with substantial risks of rebleeding and death. Current guidelines recommend endoscopic variceal ligation combined with nonselective beta-blockers as standard secondary prophylaxis for esophageal variceal bleeding and type 1 gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can markedly reduce portal pressure and prevent recurrent variceal bleeding, but its broader use in secondary prophylaxis is limited by the risk of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy and liver function deterioration. The VIATORR Controlled Expansion stent is designed to allow controlled expansion between 8 and 10 mm. However, even 8-mm TIPS may still be associated with a substantial risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy. This trial evaluates an underdilated VCX-TIPS strategy, in which a commercially available 8-10 mm VIATORR Controlled Expansion stent is initially dilated only with a 6-mm balloon, aiming to achieve sufficient portal decompression while reducing the risk of excessive shunting. This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized superiority trial. Eligible patients with cirrhosis who have recovered from acute esophageal variceal bleeding or type 1 gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and have entered the secondary prophylaxis phase will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either underdilated VCX-TIPS or endoscopic variceal ligation plus nonselective beta-blockers. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause death or clinically significant upper gastrointestinal rebleeding within 1 year after randomization.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the accuracy of using routine abdominal ultrasound to predict the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding in adult patients with liver cirrhosis. Esophageal variceal bleeding is a serious complication of chronic liver disease. While upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the current standard for diagnosing and grading these varices, it is an invasive procedure. In this study, researchers will use ultrasound to measure the patient's spleen size and portal vein diameter. These non-invasive measurements will then be compared to the results of a standard upper endoscopy performed within 48 to 72 hours. The goal is to determine if these simple ultrasound measurements can reliably predict the presence, grade, and bleeding risk of esophageal varices, which could potentially reduce the need for routine invasive endoscopic screenings in the future.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of somatostatin and terlipressin on lowering portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension undergoing liver transplantation, and to investigate whether there are differences in clinical outcomes between the two drugs. The study will evaluate the decrease in portal pressure from baseline following drug administration at defined time points. It will also compare the effects of these drugs on hemodynamics, bleeding, and transfusion requirements. After baseline intraoperative direct portal pressure measurement, a bolus dose of the study drug will be administered, followed by continuous intravenous infusion intraoperatively and for 24 hours postoperatively. Direct portal pressure will be measured again 5 minutes after the bolus dose, after the portal vein anastomosis, after the hepatic artery anastomosis, and, if performed after splenic artery ligation. Hemodynamic parameters will be recorded, and the drugs will be compared in terms of their intraoperative hemodynamic effects. As elevated portal pressure is associated with increased bleeding, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion needs will also be assessed between the groups. Patients will be followed for 7 days postoperatively for clinical and laboratory outcomes.

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation with standard treatment (diuretic medications, and if necessary, paracenteses) in patients with liver cirrhosis and development of ascites as the first decompensating event. By creating a shunt between the liver vein and the portal vein, blood is diverted from the portal vein directly into the hepatic vein, which results in a reduction of pressure in the portal vein so that development of ascites is reduced.

Patients with clinically significant portal hypertension allocated to implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) at the Department of Medicine II of the University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany will be offered to participate in this prospective observational trial. Clinical and laboratory as well as outcome parameters will be assessed before and within the first 12 months after TIPS implantation following a regular follow-up schedule with clinical visits at the University Medical Center Freiburg. During follow-up visits, serum/plasma samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are collected and stored in a associated biobank.

Portal vein thrombosis is defined as non-tumoural obstruction of the portal vein or one of its branches. Its incidence is 0.7 to 2.7 per 100,000 patient-years in the general population, and 4.6 per 100 patient-years in patients with cirrhosis. Histological modificaitions fo the portal vein wall and haemostatic changes have been described in cirrhotic patients. The contribution of these changes, both systemic and local, to the development of portal vein thrombosis is debated. One of the hypotheses put forward on the genesis of portal vein thrombosis is as follows: certain bacterial translocations from the digestive tract, promoted by portal hypertension, contribute to endothelial activation resulting in the release of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII, as well as platelet activation and the coagulation cascade, which is dysregulated by cirrhosis and underlying changes in haemostatic balance. Inflammatory phenomena and NETosis may also be involved. Studies suggest that cirrhotic patients have lesions of the glycocalyx located in the portal area, which may be involved in the development of portal vein thrombosis. Patients with cirrhosis may benefit from the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). During the TIPS placement procedure, blood is drawn from the internal jugular vein and the portal vein, allowing for parallel biological analyses. The assumption of this study is that haemostasis and inflammation are disrupted differently at the systemic and portal levels in cirrhotic patients.

The APIXABAN-PK trial is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban in combination with carvedilol versus placebo with carvedilol in preventing portal hypertension-related complications in patients with cirrhosis. Conducted at the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department and Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) of Asian Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Hospital, Hyderabad, Pakistan, the trial will enroll eligible cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Participants will be followed for 12 months to monitor hepatic decompensation events, variceal bleeding, portal vein thrombosis, and mortality, while safety and tolerability of apixaban will be closely assessed. This study aims to provide local evidence for apixaban use in cirrhosis management in Pakistan.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of high-risk factors-such as elevated portal venous pressure, concurrent large extra-luminal vessels, portal vein thrombosis, and prominent portosystemic shunts-on the efficacy of endoscopic therapy. By comparing with interventional treatment, the goal is to optimize the clinical management protocol for esophageal and gastric varices, enhance the therapeutic outcomes of portal hypertension-related esophageal and gastric varices, and improve patient prognosis.

The goal of this observational study: * To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive markers in predicting the presence and grading of esophageal varices in children with portal hypertension. * To correlate these non-invasive markers with the severity of portal hypertension and the grade of esophageal varices to identify patients at high risk of bleeding. * To propose a defined protocol for screening esophageal varices in those children.

Portal hypertension is characterised by an increased portal pressure gradient (PPG), that is the difference in pressure between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava (IVC). Portal hypertension is a consequence of cirrhosis resulting from chronic hepatitis. Patients with portal hypertension are at risk of developing complications including oesophageal or gastric varices, variceal bleeding, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy and mortality. Albeit its clinical significance, direct measurement of portal venous pressure to document portal hypertension has traditionally been difficult. The portal vein pressure can be measured by transhepatic or transvenous methods but the procedure carries a risk of intra-peritoneal bleeding. Furthermore, the IVC pressure measurement requires further transjugular catheterisation. Hence, the technique is rarely used. Currently, the gold standard in measurement of portal hypertension is via measurement hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The HVPG has been shown to correlate with risk of clinical decompensation, development of varices, hepatocellular carcinoma, variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and mortality. Nevertheless, the technique has a low acceptance rate amongst patients and it may not be available even in tertiary medical centres. Recently, the use of EUS-guided approach for measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPGM) has been shown to be feasible. The technical success rate was 100% and no adverse events were reported. Measurements obtained with the EUS approach was shown to correlate excellently with clinical parameters of portal hypertension including presence of varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, the procedure could be performed at the same time of screening oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), that is frequently required for variceal screening in this group of patients. Hence, the aim of the current study is to investigate the feasibility of EUS-PPGM and correlate the risk of developing complications with the PPGM in patients that are suffering from chronic hepatitis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation is an established minimally invasive treatment for complications of portal hypertension such as refractory ascites and variceal bleeding. A technically challenging step of the procedure is the puncture of the portal vein from the hepatic vein, which is usually performed under fluoroscopic guidance and may require multiple puncture attempts. This prospective pilot study evaluates the use of fiber-optic navigation technology during TIPS creation. The system allows real-time three-dimensional visualization of guidewires and catheters and may improve spatial orientation during the procedure. Approximately 30 patients with a clinical indication for TIPS placement will be included. The study will assess procedural parameters such as the number of puncture attempts, fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, procedure duration, technical success, and complications. The results may help to improve procedural efficiency and radiation safety during TIPS interventions.

The goal of this interventional trial is to compare in measuring of portal hypertension by HVPG and EUS-PPG in subject indicated to HVPG measurement. The primary question is whether EUS-PPG provides measurements really equivalent to HVPG in terms of gradient accuracy. Participants undergoing HVPG will first undergo the procedure while conscious, performed by the first operator. Immediately thereafter, HVPG will be repeated following the induction of anesthesia by a second operator blinded to the initial readings. Subsequently, EUS-PPG will be performed by an endoscopist, who will also be blinded to all previous pressure measurements.

Esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a severe complication of portal hypertension (PH), characterized by high bleeding volume, high rebleeding rate, and high mortality. In recent years, endoscopic treatment has significantly improved therapeutic efficacy and patient survival. However, due to substantial individual variations among patients, individualized stratified management is crucial. For special populations with cirrhotic portal hypertension, clear management guidelines and clinical research evidence are lacking. The incidence of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is increasing year by year; it has complex etiologies, lacks specific symptoms and imaging features, and poses diagnostic challenges. Currently, multi-omics research on portal hypertension is insufficient. The integration of multi-omics technologies, including genomics, radiomics, metabolomics, and gut microbiota, holds promise for a more comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis. With continuous improvements in multi-modal medical data fusion technology, there is an urgent need to develop clinical decision support systems by combining standardized multi-omics databases with artificial intelligence techniques, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making capabilities and prognostic assessment. This study aims to expand the established portal hypertension biobank by extending the temporal depth of clinical cohort data and diversifying sample types.

Alterations in conventional coagulation tests in patients with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension do not reliably predict bleeding risk, as hemostatic balance is complex and often compensated. Many procedure-related bleeding events are driven by non-coagulatory factors, such as portal hypertension or technical aspects of the procedure. Most commonly performed procedures carry a low risk of bleeding even in the presence of elevated INR or thrombocytopenia, and no validated laboratory thresholds support prophylactic correction. Risk assessment should therefore be based on procedural factors, severity of liver disease, and systemic patient conditions, with correction of modifiable risk factors particularly before high-risk elective procedures.

How to construct a novel, non-invasive, accurate, and convenient method to achieve prediction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is an important general problem in the management of portal hypertension in cirrhosis or advanced chronic liver disease. We plan to investigate the ability of three demensional-magnetic resonance elastography (3D-MRE) to establish a risk stratification system and perform tailored management for portal hypertension in cirrhosis or advanced chronic liver disease.