Portal Hypertension

This is an open-label, non-randomized trial that will be conducted at three clinical sites, Thomas Jefferson University (TJU), the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP) and University of Bern (UB). Enrollment will be allocated into one of 4 different cohorts depending on the inclusion criteria for each cohort. Cohort 1: Patients scheduled for hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements will subsequently undergo two consecutive SHAPE (subharmonic aided pressure estimation) procedures using different ultrasound contrast agents (Definity \[Lantheus Medical Imaging, N Bilerica, MA, USA\] and Sonazoid \[GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway\] in randomized order) to estimate portal pressures with a Logiq E10 scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and determine the reproducibility of the SHAPE algorithm. Cohort 2: Patients identified as having clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) will be monitored by SHAPE with Sonazoid for the duration of this project (18-24 months on average). These subjects will have follow-up ultrasound scans every 6 ± 2 months to check for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (using the Barcelona-Liver Cancer staging system) as well as ascites and at those times a repeat SHAPE examination will be performed. Liver stiffness values will be measured with elastography as well. This cohort will examine if serial SHAPE can accurately predict development of ascites and other liver related events in patients with compensated cirrhosis undergoing routine HCC surveillance in a multi-center setting. Cohort 3: Subjects newly diagnosed with portal hypertension and starting treatment with non-selective β-blockers will be monitored with SHAPE and results compared to elastography measurements of liver stiffness with standard assessments (e.g., serum liver function tests and measurement of spleen size as well as platelet count). This cohort will establish if SHAPE can be used to monitor treatment response in patients identified with portal hypertension. Cohort 4: Patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease scheduled for an endoscopy examination for screening of varices relative to the Baveno VI and the expanded-Baveno VI criteria as well as the AST to Platelet Ratio Index will undergo a SHAPE examination. This cohort will compare the predictive ability of SHAPE for allocating patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease to screening of varices compared to the current standard of care.

This prospective observational study aims to validate Baveno VIII criteria for detection of clinically significant portal hypertension and to evaluate additional predictors of esophageal varices in Egyptian patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease and liver stiffness measurement between 15 and 25 kPa.

1. Background Handgrip strength , a core indicator of muscle function, has been confirmed to be significantly associated with the clinical prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. However, no studies have explored its correlation with portal venous hemodynamics. 2. Objective The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of Handgrip strength on portal vein and left gastric vein pressure, blood flow velocity and direction in patients with liver cirrhosis, as well as its hemodynamic impact on gastroesophageal varices. 3. Method Study Design: Interventional study. Detection Timing: Hemodynamic indices were measured simultaneously after patients achieved their maximum handgrip strength. Participants were divided into three groups based on the assessment methods. Group 1 (Portal Pressure Measurement Group): Before the placement of TIPS, the pressures of the portal vein and left gastric vein were measured, both before and after the handgrip strength test. Group 2 (Doppler Ultrasound Measurement Group): Measurements of portal flow velocity and direction were taken before and after the handgrip strength test, based on Doppler ultrasound. Group 3 (Endoscopic Ultrasound Measurement Group): Measurements of blood flow volume and direction in esophagogastric varices were conducted before and after the handgrip strength test, based on endoscopic ultrasonography. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were described. 4. Elaboration of the Research Hypothesis 4.1. Core Hypothesis The handgrip strength level in patients with liver cirrhosis is correlated with portal venous system hemodynamic indices. Specifically, enhanced handgrip strength may affect portal hypertension and the hemodynamics of varicose veins by improving systemic muscle function or circulatory status. 4.2. Speculation on potential mechanisms Association between muscle function and circulation: As a representative of systemic muscle function, increased handgrip strength may reflect an increase in cardiac output or changes in splanchnic vascular resistance, thereby influencing portal venous hemodynamics. Effects on varicose veins: Improved handgrip strength may reduce blood flow velocity or diameter of esophagogastric varices by decreasing splanchnic congestion or regulating local vascular tension, thus lowering the risk of variceal rupture and bleeding. Role of compensatory mechanisms: Muscle wasting is common in decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with higher handgrip strength may have better compensatory capacity, and the degree of hemodynamic disorder in their portal venous system may be less severe. Conclusion This study uses a multi-method grouping design to first explore the association between handgrip strength and portal venous hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients. The hypothesis is based on the potential regulatory role of muscle function in the circulatory system, which is expected to provide a new non-invasive indicator for clinical assessment of portal hypertension risk.

The objective of this observational study is to investigate and validate the utility of the Sound Touch Viscoelastography(STVi) technique in patients with liver cirrhosis for noninvasive prediction of Portal hypertension (PH). The primary research questions it seeks to address are as follows: * What is the correlation between the liver STVi index and Portal Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG)? * Is STVi an available tool to non-invasively predict PH in patients with liver cirrhosis? And the effectiveness and practicality of STVi will be validated. * To establish a predictive model for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension (CSPH) utilizing liver STVi index as the primary indicator. The HVPG is considered as the gold standard in this study and STVi was employed to quantify the STVi index of the liver in patients with liver cirrhosis. Researchers will compare the two patients groups, HVPG≥10 mmHg and HVPG\<10 mmHg, to see the usage of STVi in the noninvasive prediction of PH.

The goal of this investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective study is to evaluate the accuracy, safety, and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement as a potential alternative to the traditional hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) method in patients with portal hypertension due to chronic liver disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the correlation between EUS-PPG and HVPG measurements in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis? * Can EUS-PPG serve as a reliable and less invasive alternative to HVPG for assessing portal pressure? * What are the safety outcomes associated with EUS-PPG compared to HVPG? Researchers will compare EUS-PPG measurements with HVPG measurements within the same patients to assess whether EUS-PPG provides accurate and clinically comparable portal pressure readings while reducing procedural risks. Participants will: * Be adults aged 18 to 85 with a history of liver disease and portal hypertension or suspected cirrhosis requiring HVPG measurement. * Undergo both EUS-PPG and HVPG measurements within a seven-day window to allow for direct comparison of results. * Receive standard clinical care for their condition, including routine diagnostic evaluations and portal hypertension management as needed. * Be monitored for safety outcomes, including adverse events such as bleeding, infection, perforation, and any other complications related to the procedure. * Provide relevant demographic and clinical data, including liver disease history, Child-Pugh and MELD scores, and portal hypertension-related complications such as varices or ascites.

Obesity and metabolic abnormalities accelerate decompensation in compensated cirrhosis, driven by clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, HVPG≥10 mmHg). Lifestyle-induced weight loss can lower portal pressure, but pharmacological options are limited. Mazdutide, a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist, has proven weight-loss and glycaemic benefits, yet its safety and efficacy in cirrhosis with portal hypertension are unknown. This investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, exploratory trial evaluates whether mazdutide can safely reduce portal pressure in overweight patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does 16-week mazdutide treatment reduce HVPG (percentage change from baseline)? What adverse events occur, and is the drug tolerated? Participants will: Receive mazdutide SC injection once weekly for 16 weeks, titrated from 2 mg to 4 mg to 6 mg (if tolerated), with dose adjustment for intolerance. Undergo HVPG at baseline and week 16 (primary endpoint). Have FibroScan® (liver/spleen stiffness, CAP) at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16. Provide blood samples for liver, renal, glucose, lipid, and coagulation tests at each visit. Undergo body composition, handgrip strength, and nutritional assessments to monitor muscle mass. Attend clinic visits every 4 weeks during treatment and one follow-up visit 4 weeks post-treatment. Key eligibility: Adults 18-75 with compensated cirrhosis (viral, MASLD, or alcohol-related), HVPG≥10 mmHg, BMI≥28 or ≥26 with comorbidities, stable weight, and stable carvedilol/propranolol if used. Exclude prior decompensation, HCC, CTP≥B8, eGFR\<60, mazdutide contraindications, active infection, uncontrolled hepatitis, portal vein thrombosis, etc. Endpoints: Primary - % change in HVPG. Secondary - HVPG response (≥10% decrease or \<10 mmHg), decompensation events, treatment discontinuation due to AEs. Exploratory - changes in stiffness, liver fat, metabolic parameters, body composition, nutrition. Safety: AEs (CTCAE v5.0), labs, vitals, with special monitoring for GI symptoms, dehydration, renal function, hepatic encephalopathy, muscle loss, pancreatitis, and gallbladder events. Sample size and analysis: 50 patients. Primary endpoint analysed by paired t-test or Wilcoxon (α=0.05, two-sided) in FAS and PPS. Secondary endpoints mainly descriptive; key secondary tested for support. Subgroup analyses planned if feasible. Study duration: 20 weeks (2-week screening, 16-week treatment, 4-week follow-up). Conducted at Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China. Ethics approved, informed consent required. This study will provide first evidence on mazdutide for portal hypertension in overweight cirrhosis.

Refractory hepatic encephalopathy (RHE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a serious complication that can markedly impair quality of life and worsen prognosis. Standard medical management-including lactulose, rifaximin, nutritional support, and correction of precipitating factors-is routinely used; however, some patients continue to experience recurrent hepatic encephalopathy despite optimized therapy. TIPS shunt reduction is an established interventional option for RHE, but current techniques may provide limited ability to precisely control the degree of flow reduction while maintaining procedural safety. The investigators developed a coil-assisted, small-diameter covered-stent technique that deploys coils as an anchor within the existing TIPS tract, followed by placement of a 6-mm balloon-dilated covered stent to achieve controlled reduction in shunt flow. This single-center ambispective cohort study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique in patients with RHE after TIPS by including both retrospective and prospective cohorts. Outcomes will include hepatic encephalopathy severity and recurrence, stent patency, portal hypertension-related complications, changes in portal pressure gradient, liver function parameters, transplant-free survival, and procedure-related adverse events.

This study looks to gather data on hepatomiR, a CE-certified test already intended for gauging liver-related outcomes, in order to define a cut-off regarding specific decompensation events (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy) in chronic liver disease (CLD). Based on these data, it is aimed to advance the current understanding of factors driving decompensation, with potential repercussions for future risk management and therapy.

This clinical trial tests the how well an ultrasound with subharmonic imaging and the subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique works in identifying portal hypertension (PH). An ultrasound takes pictures of the inside of the body by bouncing sound waves off organs. PH is high blood pressure in the vein that carries blood to the liver from the stomach, small and large intestines, spleen, pancreas, and gallbladder. The complications associated with PH are clear only after severe liver dysfunction or liver cirrhosis develops and are accompanied by relatively high mortality rates (20-70% mortality within 2 years). Thus, identifying PH earlier is beneficial. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) obtained using an invasive catheterization procedure remains the standard for assessing PH. However, using this invasive procedure to assess PH prevents frequent pressure monitoring. Thus, a noninvasive technique to estimate PH is beneficial not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring treatment and disease progression. The SHAPE technique is a noninvasive ultrasound-based imaging technique that can estimate pressure with an ultrasound contrast agent. A noninvasive technique using an ultrasound with subharmonic imaging and the SHAPE technique may work in identifying PH.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if treating individuals living in Uganda who have liver fibrosis (scarring) due to schistosomiasis would benefit from more frequent treatment with drug praziquantel. This drug is already approved to treat schistosomiasis and is used globally. The study will include individuals who have schistosomiasis and some degree of liver fibrosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does treating participants three times per year as compared to once per year as currently recommended improve the likelihood the hepatic fibrosis will improve over three years. 2. Does treating participants three times per year as compared to once per year as currently recommended decrease the risk they have for bleeding due to portal hypertension over three years. 3. Is there a blood test that can tell us which individuals will experience worsening liver fibrosis before this happens. Participants will: Be screened for schistosomiasis using a urine test If participants have schistosomiasis they will undergo other screening procedures including a liver ultrasound, blood tests, and a physical exam if they have both schistosomiasis and liver (fibrosis) they will be invited to participate in the trial If they are in the trial they will: Take the drug praziquantel once per year or three times per year based on randomization for three years Have a liver ultrasound and blood samples for markers of liver fibrosis once per year Provide a urine sample to test for schistosomiasis each year

This study compares two endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments for gastric varices, which are enlarged veins in the stomach that can bleed. Both treatments use small coils placed into the varix. One group will receive coils with cyanoacrylate medical glue, and the other group will receive coils with absorbable gelatin sponge. The purpose of the study is to determine whether absorbable gelatin sponge with coils is not worse than cyanoacrylate glue with coils for closing off gastric varices, and to compare safety outcomes. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Participants and outcome assessors will not know which treatment was used, but the doctor performing the procedure will know. After the procedure, participants will be followed for up to 12 months. Follow-up may include clinical assessments, questionnaires about health and quality of life, CT imaging shortly after the procedure, and repeat endoscopic ultrasound assessments to evaluate whether the gastric varix has been successfully treated.

PORTAL-4D is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, parallel-group diagnostic study conducted at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France). Portal hypertension is the main driver of hepatic decompensation and is associated with ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and reduced survival. The current gold standard for assessing portal hypertension is the invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement performed via the transjugular route. However, HVPG is invasive, operator-dependent, and limited to specialized centers. A reliable non-invasive alternative is therefore highly needed. 60 adults patients with cirrhosis will be enrolled and divided into two parallel groups: MASLD group (n=24): Patients with compensated cirrhosis related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). TIPS group (n=36): Patients with decompensated cirrhosis referred for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. The primary objective is to assess the correlation between invasive HVPG values and 4D-flow MRI parameters. Secondary objectives include evaluating the prognostic value of 4D-flow MRI in predicting portal hypertension-related complications and post-TIPS outcomes within 6 months. The study is expected to validate 4D-flow MRI as an non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for portal hypertension, potentially improving patient selection for TIPS and reducing reliance on invasive procedures.

The objective of the study is to collect and evaluate clinical data on patients of the Lifetech Cera™ Vascular Plug System to: * confirm the performance * confirm the safety * identify previously unknown side-effects * monitor the identified side-effects (related to the procedures or to the medical devices) * identify and analyse emergent risks

The goal of this registry is to better understand how primary biliary cholangitis develops over time, including the role of disease-related biomarkers, complications of the disease, and symptom burden. Patients with primary biliary cholangitis treated at participating centres in Austria will be invited to take part in this prospective registry. Participation in an associated biobank is optional. Clinical and laboratory data will be collected, and patients will be followed regularly through scheduled clinic visits. In addition, biological samples (serum, plasma, and, if available, liver tissue) may be collected and stored in the biobank for future research.

Patients with liver cirrhosis often have impaired or at-risk kidney function due to the close link between liver and kidney (hepatorenal syndrome). Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection (LSD) is commonly used to treat Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Bleeding in these patients, but its impact on kidney function over 2 years is unclear. This study will follow patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy to measure changes in kidney function before and after surgery, identify risk factors for kidney damage and whether LSD can improve kidney function in the long term, and help improve care to protect kidney function in cirrhotic patients .

This study is a single-center, prospective cohort study based on real-world data. Patients with portal hypertension and esophagogastric varices were enrolled and divided into an endoscopic treatment group and a non-endoscopic treatment group (including patients receiving medical therapy, interventional procedures, or surgical treatment) according to whether they underwent endoscopic intervention. Baseline data, serum metabolites, CT imaging and endoscopic images, liver biopsy pathology, and other multi-omics data were integrated for both groups. Patients were followed up to compare adverse events after variceal treatment, including rebleeding and its causes, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, subsequent treatments (such as regular endoscopic therapy, NSSB, and TIPS), and survival outcomes. Clinical characteristics of portal hypertension attributed to different etiologies, including hepatitis B, autoimmune liver disease, schistosomiasis, hematological disorders, and chemotherapy-induced liver injury, were compared. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic and interventional treatments for esophagogastric varices were evaluated. Factors influencing rebleeding rates among different treatment groups were analyzed, and reasons for inclusion in different groups were discussed.

Patients with liver cirrhosis frequently exhibit dyslipidemia due to impaired hepatic lipid synthesis, altered bile acid metabolism, and portal hypertension. Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection (LSD) is commonly used to treat Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Bleeding in these patients, but its impact on lipid profiles over 2 years remains poorly characterized. This study will follow patients undergoing LSD to measure changes in serum lipid parameters before and after surgery, identify risk factors for lipid profile deterioration or improvement, and determine whether LSD can ameliorate dyslipidemia in the long term, thereby informing metabolic management strategies in cirrhotic patients.

Variceal bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with substantial risks of rebleeding and death. Current guidelines recommend endoscopic variceal ligation combined with nonselective beta-blockers as standard secondary prophylaxis for esophageal variceal bleeding and type 1 gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can markedly reduce portal pressure and prevent recurrent variceal bleeding, but its broader use in secondary prophylaxis is limited by the risk of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy and liver function deterioration. The VIATORR Controlled Expansion stent is designed to allow controlled expansion between 8 and 10 mm. However, even 8-mm TIPS may still be associated with a substantial risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy. This trial evaluates an underdilated VCX-TIPS strategy, in which a commercially available 8-10 mm VIATORR Controlled Expansion stent is initially dilated only with a 6-mm balloon, aiming to achieve sufficient portal decompression while reducing the risk of excessive shunting. This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized superiority trial. Eligible patients with cirrhosis who have recovered from acute esophageal variceal bleeding or type 1 gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and have entered the secondary prophylaxis phase will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either underdilated VCX-TIPS or endoscopic variceal ligation plus nonselective beta-blockers. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause death or clinically significant upper gastrointestinal rebleeding within 1 year after randomization.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the accuracy of using routine abdominal ultrasound to predict the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding in adult patients with liver cirrhosis. Esophageal variceal bleeding is a serious complication of chronic liver disease. While upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the current standard for diagnosing and grading these varices, it is an invasive procedure. In this study, researchers will use ultrasound to measure the patient's spleen size and portal vein diameter. These non-invasive measurements will then be compared to the results of a standard upper endoscopy performed within 48 to 72 hours. The goal is to determine if these simple ultrasound measurements can reliably predict the presence, grade, and bleeding risk of esophageal varices, which could potentially reduce the need for routine invasive endoscopic screenings in the future.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of somatostatin and terlipressin on lowering portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension undergoing liver transplantation, and to investigate whether there are differences in clinical outcomes between the two drugs. The study will evaluate the decrease in portal pressure from baseline following drug administration at defined time points. It will also compare the effects of these drugs on hemodynamics, bleeding, and transfusion requirements. After baseline intraoperative direct portal pressure measurement, a bolus dose of the study drug will be administered, followed by continuous intravenous infusion intraoperatively and for 24 hours postoperatively. Direct portal pressure will be measured again 5 minutes after the bolus dose, after the portal vein anastomosis, after the hepatic artery anastomosis, and, if performed after splenic artery ligation. Hemodynamic parameters will be recorded, and the drugs will be compared in terms of their intraoperative hemodynamic effects. As elevated portal pressure is associated with increased bleeding, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion needs will also be assessed between the groups. Patients will be followed for 7 days postoperatively for clinical and laboratory outcomes.

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation with standard treatment (diuretic medications, and if necessary, paracenteses) in patients with liver cirrhosis and development of ascites as the first decompensating event. By creating a shunt between the liver vein and the portal vein, blood is diverted from the portal vein directly into the hepatic vein, which results in a reduction of pressure in the portal vein so that development of ascites is reduced.

Patients with clinically significant portal hypertension allocated to implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) at the Department of Medicine II of the University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany will be offered to participate in this prospective observational trial. Clinical and laboratory as well as outcome parameters will be assessed before and within the first 12 months after TIPS implantation following a regular follow-up schedule with clinical visits at the University Medical Center Freiburg. During follow-up visits, serum/plasma samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are collected and stored in a associated biobank.

Portal vein thrombosis is defined as non-tumoural obstruction of the portal vein or one of its branches. Its incidence is 0.7 to 2.7 per 100,000 patient-years in the general population, and 4.6 per 100 patient-years in patients with cirrhosis. Histological modificaitions fo the portal vein wall and haemostatic changes have been described in cirrhotic patients. The contribution of these changes, both systemic and local, to the development of portal vein thrombosis is debated. One of the hypotheses put forward on the genesis of portal vein thrombosis is as follows: certain bacterial translocations from the digestive tract, promoted by portal hypertension, contribute to endothelial activation resulting in the release of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII, as well as platelet activation and the coagulation cascade, which is dysregulated by cirrhosis and underlying changes in haemostatic balance. Inflammatory phenomena and NETosis may also be involved. Studies suggest that cirrhotic patients have lesions of the glycocalyx located in the portal area, which may be involved in the development of portal vein thrombosis. Patients with cirrhosis may benefit from the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). During the TIPS placement procedure, blood is drawn from the internal jugular vein and the portal vein, allowing for parallel biological analyses. The assumption of this study is that haemostasis and inflammation are disrupted differently at the systemic and portal levels in cirrhotic patients.

The APIXABAN-PK trial is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban in combination with carvedilol versus placebo with carvedilol in preventing portal hypertension-related complications in patients with cirrhosis. Conducted at the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department and Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) of Asian Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Hospital, Hyderabad, Pakistan, the trial will enroll eligible cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Participants will be followed for 12 months to monitor hepatic decompensation events, variceal bleeding, portal vein thrombosis, and mortality, while safety and tolerability of apixaban will be closely assessed. This study aims to provide local evidence for apixaban use in cirrhosis management in Pakistan.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of high-risk factors-such as elevated portal venous pressure, concurrent large extra-luminal vessels, portal vein thrombosis, and prominent portosystemic shunts-on the efficacy of endoscopic therapy. By comparing with interventional treatment, the goal is to optimize the clinical management protocol for esophageal and gastric varices, enhance the therapeutic outcomes of portal hypertension-related esophageal and gastric varices, and improve patient prognosis.