Procedural Sedation and Analgesia

This study compares two anesthesia medications, esketamine and sufentanil, used together with propofol during ERCP procedures. The goal is to find out which combination provides better safety and comfort for people undergoing ERCP. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or sufentanil during sedation. Researchers will monitor blood oxygen levels, blood pressure, and recovery time during and after the procedure to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether a participant's understanding of the informed consent information is related to the amount of propofol needed during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). EBUS is a procedure that uses a thin camera and ultrasound to look at lymph nodes and other areas inside the chest. Propofol is a sedative medicine used to help participants stay comfortable during the procedure. Before EBUS, all participants will receive the usual information about the procedure as part of routine care. After this routine consent process, participants will answer short questions about what they understood. They will also answer questions about their anxiety before the procedure. The study will not change the usual consent process, sedation plan, or medical care. During EBUS, participants will receive usual sedation and monitoring according to routine clinical practice. The research team will record how much sedative medicine is used, whether extra sedation is needed, whether any important clinical events occur, and how participants recover after sedation. The main question is whether participants who understand the consent information better need less propofol during EBUS.

Procedural sedation for children outside of the operating room is a common practice in emergency departments, outpatient clinics, radiology suites, and dental offices for painful and anxiety-provoking procedures. However, there is emerging evidence that so-called "delayed maladaptive behaviors" (disordered sleep, anxiety, and aggression) affect nearly a quarter of children for up to 2 weeks following sedation. This can lead to poor school attendance, reduced extracurricular involvement, disruptions to caregivers' employment obligations, and poor patient satisfaction. As this phenomenon has only recently been identified, very little is known about what factors predispose children to delayed maladaptive behaviors, however, small studies suggest younger age and pre-procedural anxiety may be involved. The aim of our study is to characterize risk factors for delayed maladaptive behavior in a large multicentre study involving emergency departments, dental offices, and hospital sedation services. Understanding these risk factors may help healthcare workers prevent delayed maladaptive behaviors and provide patients with anticipatory guidance, akin to post-operative recovery instructions. There is emerging evidence that maladaptive behaviors, including significant negative behavioral changes, can occur in children following procedural sedation. These include disordered sleep, anxiety, and aggression)1,2 and affect up to 24% of children following inhalational anesthetics3 and intravenous sedatives such as ketamine.1 Moreover, these appear to be more pronounced in children \<4 years4 and can persist for up to 2 weeks post-sedation. Unfortunately, only two trials have reported delayed maladaptive behaviors.1,2 Data on immediate and delayed AEs are urgently needed for safe clinical decision-making and anticipatory guidance surrounding ED anxiolytics. In a prospective cohort study of children undergoing emergency department procedural sedation with intravenous ketamine, 22% exhibited significant negative behavioral changes 1-2 weeks after discharge, as measured by the Post-Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire. High pre-procedure anxiety have been identified as independent predictors of these maladaptive behaviors.5 Additionally, irritability, hyperactivity, and hallucinations during recovery have been reported and are associated with lower parental satisfaction.6

This is a prospective, monocentric diagnostic study aiming to evaluate whether a sedation score obtained by a per-procedural electroencephalogram (EEG), the PSI score, could identify patients for whom a 2 μg/kg dose of DEX would not be sufficient for the successful performance of cerebral NMRI, and who could therefore benefit from a higher dosage of DEX (4 μg/kg).

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether the CONOX monitor can detect pain during sedation in patients undergoing urological procedures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the qNOX index respond to pain-related motor responses during urological procedural sedation? Does the qNOX index show greater responsiveness to painful episodes compared to blood pressure and heart rate? Participants undergoing urological procedures (such as cystoscopy) under sedation as part of their regular medical care will have continuous brain activity monitoring with the CONOX device. All monitoring displays (CONOX monitor, vital signs monitor, and target-controlled infusion pump) will be video-recorded throughout the procedure to capture synchronized data including qCON, qNOX, EMG, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and drug concentrations. Researchers will analyze the relationship between these indices and spontaneous movements triggered by painful stimulation to evaluate the monitor's performance compared to traditional vital signs.