Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Introduction: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy have been recommended as the first-line treatment of driver-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the efficacy is worse in NSCLC patients with bone metastases due to the immunosuppressive microenvironment. Studies have shown that not only the nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitors but also Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) play a significant role in improving the tumor immune microenvironment. Therefore, narlumosbart，a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting RANKL，in combination with SBRT may have synergistic effects and improve efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in driver-negative advanced NSCLC patients with bone metastases. Methods: This single-arm, single-center phase II clinical trial will enroll NSCLC patients with bone metastases who have not received any systemic therapy. Patients will receive narlumosbart and bone target lesion SBRT in combination with first-line treatment immunotherapy and chemotherapy after screening eligible subjects. Narlumosbart, 120mg/time, subcutaneous injection, will be administered every 4 weeks. For the treatment of SBRT for bone metastases, the dose of 24Gy/3F is used for spinal metastases, and 30Gy/5F or 35Gy/5F is used for non-spinal lesions. Chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy will be used in accordance with the guidelines. The primary endpoint is to assess the objective response rate of NSCLC patients with bone metastases from narlumosbart combined with SBRT and first-line chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, overall survival, bone-related events, pain score, and quality of life. Sample size was calculated using the Simon's Two-Stage method. 9 patients will be enrolled in the first stage. If ≥ 2 patients achieve CR/PR, the second stage of enrollment will be performed. If fewer than 2 patients achieve CR/PR, the trial will be terminated. In the second phase, 15 patients will be enrolled. 27 subjects will be enrolled in this project, considering the dropout rate of 10%. Wangjun Yan AND Zhengfei Zhu are the Co-Principal Investigators of this study.

PRO-BOOST-N is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II/III clinical trial for patients with prostate cancer and pelvic lymph node involvement (cN1M0) confirmed by PSMA PET/CT, without distant metastatic disease. Patients with PSMA PET-staged node-positive prostate cancer are potentially curable, but remain at substantial risk of distant progression despite contemporary treatment with radiotherapy, long-term androgen deprivation therapy, and, when appropriate, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. The optimal way to intensify radiotherapy to the prostate and PSMA PET-positive pelvic lymph nodes remains uncertain in the era of modern molecular imaging. All participants receive a standardized ultrahypofractionated whole-pelvis radiotherapy backbone delivered in five fractions, combined with long-term systemic therapy according to contemporary clinical practice. The study uses a 2 x 2 factorial randomized design to evaluate two treatment questions. The primary comparison evaluates whether prostate dose escalation improves metastasis-free survival compared with no additional prostate boost. Patients assigned to prostate boost receive one of three protocol-defined boost techniques: high-dose-rate brachytherapy, low-dose-rate brachytherapy, or single-fraction SBRT. If more than one prostate boost technique is available at the treating center and technically suitable for the patient, the boost technique is assigned by embedded subrandomization. The key secondary, hierarchically tested comparison evaluates nodal dose escalation by comparing two predefined dose levels to PSMA PET-positive pelvic lymph nodes. Organ-at-risk-driven nodal dose de-escalation is permitted within the higher-dose arm when required for patient safety and protocol compliance. The primary endpoint is metastasis-free survival (MFS) . Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), intraprostatic and regional nodal control, time to castration-resistant prostate cancer, time to next systemic therapy, treatment-related adverse events graded according to CTCAE version 6.0, and patient-reported quality of life, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and global health domains. PRO-BOOST-N aims to determine the optimal radiotherapy intensification strategy for patients with PSMA PET-staged node-positive prostate cancer by prospectively evaluating prostate-directed and nodal-directed dose escalation within a modern, standardized radiotherapy platform.

PRO-BOOST-LC is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II/III clinical trial for men with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer without lymph node or distant metastases, confirmed using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT). Radiotherapy is an established curative treatment option for prostate cancer. Several modern radiotherapy strategies can safely deliver high radiation doses to the prostate while limiting dose to surrounding organs. These include stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, and combinations of external beam radiotherapy with a prostate boost. However, the optimal dose-escalation strategy for balancing cancer control, treatment-related toxicity, and long-term quality of life remains uncertain in patients staged with modern PSMA PET imaging. The aim of PRO-BOOST-LC is to compare definitive SBRT monotherapy with whole-gland prostate boost strategies delivered after a short course of external beam radiotherapy. Participants will be randomly assigned, according to center capability and patient-level technical suitability, to one of the protocol-defined treatment options. The control group receives SBRT monotherapy. The experimental groups receive external beam radiotherapy followed by one of three whole-gland boost techniques: HDR brachytherapy, LDR brachytherapy, or single-fraction SBRT boost. The primary objective is to determine whether assignment to a prostate boost strategy improves failure-free survival compared with SBRT monotherapy. Failure-free survival includes biochemical recurrence, local or regional progression, distant metastases, progression-driven salvage treatment, or death from any cause. Key secondary outcomes include metastasis-free survival, overall survival, physician-reported treatment-related toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life, including urinary, bowel, and sexual function. Participants will undergo baseline clinical evaluation, PSA testing, prostate MRI, PSMA PET/CT, and quality-of-life assessments. After treatment, participants will be followed regularly with clinical assessments, PSA testing, toxicity evaluation, patient questionnaires, and imaging when clinically indicated. The study is designed to provide long-term evidence on how best to use modern radiotherapy dose escalation for patients with PSMA-staged localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

National guidelines recommend that older adults with cancer undergo a special health assessment before starting cancer treatment. This type of assessment evaluates physical function, nutrition, social support, psychological well-being, medical conditions (both cancer-related and non-cancer-related), and cognitive function. The results can help doctors make better treatment decisions and determine whether additional support services-such as nutrition counseling, physical therapy, or social work-would be beneficial. Even though these assessments are recommended, they are not typically used because they need to be performed by a specialist and can take over an hour to complete. Given these challenges, a 10-15-minute assessment called the Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) was recently developed. The PGA can be completed by any healthcare provider and helps identify older adults who may need extra support alongside their cancer treatment. While the PGA has the potential to make geriatric assessments more accessible, the investigators do not yet know whether patients will find it useful or easy to complete. Additionally, it is unclear whether using the PGA will lead to more referrals for recommended supportive care services. This study aims to address these questions. The investigators will evaluate whether using the PGA impacts the number of patients referred to recommended supportive care services. Investigators will also evaluate how participants feel about completing the PGA, including how easy or difficult it is, and to assess the feasibility of implementing this survey on a larger scale. Finally, the investigators will use facial photographs and audio-visual data from the PGA to develop and evaluate artificial intelligence algorithm(s) to identify vulnerable patients who might benefit from additional supportive care services; namely, FaceAge, a validated deep learning model capable of estimating biological age from still facial images.

Current guidelines suggest postoperative spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) should be delivered within 2-4 weeks after surgery. This approach is rife with logistical complications that create delays and barriers for patients accessing care. An alternative approach delivers postoperative spine SBRT soon after surgery, starting within a single hospital stay. This study will investigate the effects of short-term postoperative spine SBRT on wound complications in a safety lead-in, then will transition to a phase 2 trial investigating local tumor control.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. oncologic outcomes (progression-free survival, local failure rate), 2. patient-reported outcomes, 3. physician-assessed toxicity, and 4. dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for biomarker analysis.

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of treating recurrent sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (sVT) after prior Catheter Ablation (CA) in patients with Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) between re-do of conventional endocardial CA and Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR).

In this study, participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will first receive SBRT (6Gy\*3 fractions) to treat the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes. This will be followed by a combination of Toripalimab, Docetaxel, and Cisplatin for three cycles, every three weeks. The control group will receive the same combination of Toripalimab, Docetaxel, and Cisplatin for three cycles, every three weeks, but without SBRT. After the final round of chemotherapy, all participants will have imaging scans and, three weeks later, undergo surgery. After surgery, they may also receive additional radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Patients can also choose whether to continue treatment with Toripalimab after surgery.