Upper-extremity Surgery

2

Review clinical trials related to Upper-extremity Surgery. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Classic Versus Interfascial Axillary Block in Hand, Wrist, and Forearm Surgery

Hand, wrist, and forearm surgeries are commonly performed procedures with significant postoperative pain potential. Regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus via the axillary approach is one of the gold-standard techniques for distal upper-limb surgery. In the conventional (classic) axillary block, the median, ulnar, and radial nerves within the axillary sheath are individually targeted under ultrasound guidance; however, anatomical septations around the axillary artery may prevent homogeneous spread of local anesthetic, leading to a patchy block and reduced intraoperative success. The interfascial axillary block is a modified approach in which local anesthetic is deposited into the fascial planes between the axillary muscles rather than directly into the nerve sheath, aiming for passive diffusion, homogeneous spread, and fewer needle manipulations. This prospective, randomized, single-center study compares the classic axillary block with the interfascial axillary block in patients undergoing hand, wrist, and forearm surgery, primarily in terms of surgical anesthesia adequacy (block success).

Participants needed: 110
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research HospitalUpdated: Sep 21, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Aged 18-90 years [+3]

History of local anesthetic allergy [+7]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison of 90° and 120° Arm Positions in Costoclavicular Block

The costoclavicular approach of the infraclavicular brachial plexus block is widely used for upper extremity surgeries due to its reliable anatomy and high success rates. Patient positioning, particularly the degree of arm abduction, may influence the spread of local anesthetic and the characteristics of the block. However, the optimal arm abduction angle during this procedure remains unclear. This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of two different arm abduction angles (90° and 120°) on block onset time and block success in patients undergoing hand, wrist, and forearm surgery under ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the degree of arm abduction. The primary outcome is block onset time. Secondary outcomes include block success, sensory and motor block characteristics, perfusion index changes, hemodynamic parameters, readiness for surgery at 15 and 20 minutes, block performance time, need for additional anesthesia, postoperative neurological evaluation at 4 and 24 hours, complications, and patient satisfaction. The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence on optimal patient positioning to improve the effectiveness and reliability of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

Participants needed: 106
Trial details
Age: 18-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Ankara Etlik City HospitalUpdated: Jun 9, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged between 18 and 80 years. [+3]

History of previous surgery, scar tissue, tumor, or trauma that may alter brachi... [+13]