Clinical trials

This single-center, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolls 88 patients with drug-refractory diabetic foot neuropathic pain unsuitable for revascularization surgery. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive standard diabetic foot care alone (control) or standard care plus 14-day short-term spinal cord stimulation (intervention). The primary outcome is pain remission rate at 6 months, with repeated assessments of microcirculation, nerve function, quality of life and adverse events over 6 months. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of short-term spinal cord stimulation and develops standardized clinical protocols for this minimally invasive therapy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether early postoperative colonoscopy is valuable in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after surgery for low colorectal cancer.The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Will the median diagnosis time of AL in the intervention group (early colonoscopy group) be significantly shorter than that in the control group? 2. Can targeted treatment (such as endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT)) be initiated earlier in the early colonoscopy group, thereby reducing the incidence of AL and the rate of unplanned re-laparotomy? Researchers will compare the median diagnosis time of AL in the intervention group (early colonoscopy group) with the control group to observe whether early postoperative colonoscopy can detect anastomotic leakage earlier. Participants will: Experimental group (early colonoscopy group): 1. Colonoscopy will be performed on the 5th to 8th day after surgery (the surgeon will decide the specific date within this time window based on the patient's recovery). 2. Carry out adequate intestinal preparation before the examination (the specific plan is formulated according to the hospital's routine, which may involve antegrade or retrograde enema, etc., and needs to be recorded and standardized). Control group (routine observation group): 1. Receive standard postoperative management, including monitoring vital signs, abdominal signs, drainage fluid properties, etc. 2. Only when clinical symptoms suspected of anastomotic leakage occur (such as persistent fever, worsening abdominal pain, turbid drainage fluid or stool samples), CT scan, gastrointestinal angiography or diagnostic colonoscopy should be performed according to clinical indications.

This is a prospective, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early oral lactulose for promoting postoperative gastrointestinal functional recovery in patients undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Eligible patients aged ≥18 years with complicated appendicitis confirmed by preoperative SAS 2.0 score, intraoperative findings, or postoperative pathology will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral lactulose or placebo on postoperative day 1 and day 2. The primary outcome is time to GI-2 (time from surgery to the later of first defecation or first tolerance of solid food). Secondary outcomes include time to first flatus, defecation rate within 72 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, medical costs, postoperative complications, and lactulose-related adverse events. A total of 150 patients will be enrolled. This study aims to provide high-level evidence for optimizing postoperative management in patients with complicated appendicitis.

To evaluate the short-term analgesic efficacy of stSCS combined with pharmacotherapy compared with pharmacotherapy alone in patients with CPSP, measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score immediately after treatment.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus saline in flushing the surgical area during colorectal cancer surgery. The primary outcomes included surgical site infection, postoperative complication rates, et al.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the gastroscopy, air, and methylene blue (GAM) leak testing in reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications, especially anastomotic leakage, in patients with colorectal cancer. The primary outcomes included is the incidence of anastomotic complications (mainly anastomotic leak) within 30 days after surgery

This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled study aimed at compareing the impact of stapler reinforcement patches versus standard staplers on postoperative complications in gastrojejunostomy.

This research is designed to compare proximal gastrectomy anterior anastomosis with pyloroplasty with esophagogastric anastomosis for gastric cancer. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, postoperative quality of life, short term outcomes, and long term outcomes will be compared.

With the development of stapler devices, various methods of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy were evoluated. Which stapler is more advantageous has not been determined. At present, the most commonly used is linear stapler or Circular stapler in esophagojejunostomy. However, there is still a lack of reliable evidence for the selection of the two staplers. The purpose of this study is to explore the advantages of linear staper versus circular stapler in esophagojejunostomy for patients with gastric cancer who underwent total gastrectomy.

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative Pre-emptive EVT (PEVT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leaks within 30 days after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Compare the differences between the PEVT group and the control group in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs. Analyze the incidence of other postoperative complications in the two groups, such as wound infection, abdominal abscess, and intestinal obstruction. Assess the impact of PEVT on postoperative recovery indicators, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and time to ambulation. Observe the occurrence of PEVT-related adverse events, such as device displacement, bleeding, and infection.

Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has been adopted in clinical. The safety and outcome of reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has not been systematically evaluated. The investigators sought to compare the short and long-term outcome of patients with gastric cancer who underwent reduced port gastrectomy with patients underwent traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.