Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women:A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorNanchong Central Hospital

About this trial

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement

Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia.

agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form.

Disqualifiers

►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases.

pregnant or lactating women.

those with surgical contraindications.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • To remove the uterine uterine ligament

    Procedure/Surgery

    Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.

Treatment groups

466 Participants
are divided into 8 treatment groups

8

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Patients with unilateral hernia who did not give birth,the uterine round ligament resection groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Patients with unilateral hernia who did not give birth,the uterine round ligament preservation groupNo intervention 0 interventions
Group C: Patients with unilateral hernia who have given birth,the uterine round ligament resection groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: Patients with unilateral hernia who have given birth,the uterine round ligament preservation groupNo intervention 0 interventions
Group E: Patients with bilateral hernias who have given birth,the uterine round ligament resection groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group F: Patients with bilateral hernias who have given birth,the uterine round ligament preservation groupNo intervention 0 interventions
Group G: Patients with bilateral hernia who did not give birth,the uterine round ligament resection groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group H: Patients with bilateral hernia who did not give birth,the uterine round ligament preservation groupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Time required for patient surgery

Time required for patient surgery

Time frame
20-120minutes

Secondary outcomes

1

Inguinal hernia recurrence

the recurrence of inguinal hernia

Time frame
1 month, 3 months, 6 months,1year,2years,3years,6years
2

Quality of life assessment

Quality of life assessment:The international general quality of life scale (such as SF - 36, etc.) is used to evaluate the quality of life of patients at 3 months , 6months,1year,2years,3years and 6years after surgery.

Time frame
3 months,6months,1year,2years,3years,6years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.