About this trial
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement
Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia.
agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form.
Disqualifiers
►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases.
pregnant or lactating women.
those with surgical contraindications.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
To remove the uterine uterine ligament
Procedure/SurgeryBoth groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.
Treatment groups
8
Treatment groupsSee each treatment group below.
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Time required for patient surgery
Time required for patient surgery
Secondary outcomes
Inguinal hernia recurrence
the recurrence of inguinal hernia
Quality of life assessment
Quality of life assessment:The international general quality of life scale (such as SF - 36, etc.) is used to evaluate the quality of life of patients at 3 months , 6months,1year,2years,3years and 6years after surgery.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.