An Online Intuitive Eating Program for Pregnant Women With Obesity to Support Well-Being

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorSan Diego State University

About this trial

The goal of this feasibility randomized controlled trial is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and demand, as well as preliminary effects of an evidence-based Intuitive Eating (IE) intervention among pregnant women who have obesity. The main research questions are:

RQ1: What is the feasibility (acceptability and demand) of implementing an Intuitive Eating Intervention among pregnant and postpartum women? RQ2: How does participation in the Pregnancy Intuitive Eating Intervention (PIE-I) impact key maternal health outcomes (i.e., gestational weight gain, intuitive eating behaviors, dietary quality, body image, and mental health) compared to a wait-list control?

Researchers will compare the Pregnancy Intuitive Eating Intervention (PIE-I) intervention group with the wait-list control to see what impact the PIE-I has on maternal well-being.

Participants randomized to the intervention group will complete the 8 week asynchronous IE intervention and have an opportunity to interview at the end of the study.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years

Pregnant women between 12 weeks and <22 weeks gestation

Pre-pregnancy BMI 30.0 kg/m² or greater

Able to read and understand English (for intervention materials and questionnaires)

Disqualifiers

Current or past diagnosis of an eating disorder (e.g., anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, ARFID)

High-risk pregnancy or medical complications that may significantly affect diet, physical activity, or weight gain (e.g., gestational diabetes requiring insulin, preeclampsia, hyperemesis gravidarum)

Multiple gestation pregnancy (e.g., twins or higher-order multiples)

Current participation in another nutrition, weight management, or behavioral intervention study

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Intuitive Eating Intervention

    Other intervention

    The (PIE-I) will be based on the IE Book \& Workbook published by RDNs Evelyn Tribole \& Elyse Resch. Each week, participants will be asked to watch 20 minute online modules and complete 1-2 workbook pages. Optional office hours will be held by Certified Intuitive Eating Counselors. The online modules are as follows: Week 1: Orientation of IE framework, overview of 10 Intuitive Eating Principles, and Principle 1-Reject Diet Culture Week 2: Principle 2-Honor Hunger \& Principle 3-Make Peace with Food Week 3: Principle 4-Discover the Satisfaction Factor Week 4: Principle 5-Feel Fullness Week 5: Principle 6-Challenge the Food Police Week 6: Principle 7-Cope with Emotions with Kindness Week 7: Principle 8-Respect Body\& Principle 9 -Movement: Feel the Difference Week 8: Principle 10-Honor Health with Gentle Nutrition, wrap-up and conclusion of modules

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intuitive Eating Intervention GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Usual Care Group (Waitlist Control)No intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Intervention Acceptability as Assessed by the Post-Intervention Satisfaction Survey at 8 Weeks

Intervention acceptability will be assessed using a post-intervention satisfaction survey administered at 8 weeks. Participants will rate satisfaction with the intervention, intention to continue using intuitive eating principles, and perceived appropriateness of the intervention content for pregnancy on a 1-5 scale. The feasibility benchmark will be met if ≥70% of participants provide a rating of ≥4 for each indicator.

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Burden of the Intervention at 8 Weeks

Perceived intervention burden will be assessed using a post-intervention survey on a 1-5 scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived burden. The feasibility benchmark will be a mean burden rating of ≤2.5.

Time frame
8 Weeks
3

Participant Retention Through the 8-Week Intervention

Retention will be calculated as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the intervention and 8-week post-intervention assessment. The feasibility benchmark is ≥80% retention (≥64 of 80 enrolled participants).

Time frame
Baseline through 8 weeks
4

Participant Adherence to the Intervention During the 8-Week Intervention

Intervention adherence will be assessed using Moodle analytics. Participants will be considered adherent if they complete at least 6 of the 8 intervention modules. The feasibility benchmark will be met if ≥70% of participants meet this adherence criterion.

Time frame
Baseline through 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Change from Baseline in Intuitive Eating Scale-3 (IES-3) Score at 8 Weeks

Intuitive eating will be assessed using the Intuitive Eating Scale-3 (IES-3). The IES-3 assesses individuals' tendency to eat in response to physiological hunger and satiety cues rather than external or emotional cues. Higher scores indicate greater levels of intuitive eating. Change in IES-3 score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.

Time frame
Baseline and 8 weeks
2

Change from Baseline Health Eating Index (HEI) Score at 8-weeks

Diet quality will be assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), calculated from dietary intake data collected using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. The HEI assesses alignment with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater adherence to dietary recommendations and better overall diet quality.

Time frame
Baseline and 8 weeks
3

Proportion of Participants Exceeding Recommended Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines

Gestational weight gain will be evaluated relative to recommended ranges based on pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) using Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain guidelines. Excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG) will be defined as total gestational weight gain exceeding the recommended range for the participant's pre-pregnancy BMI category. The proportion of participants with EGWG will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.

Time frame
From baseline through delivery
4

Change from Baseline in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score at 8 Weeks

Perceived stress will be assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), which measures the degree to which situations in one's life are perceived as stressful. The PSS-10 produces a total score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. Change in PSS score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.

Time frame
Baseline and 8 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

San Diego State University

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego

Collaborator