Antibacterial Effect and Soft Tissue Healing of Chlorhexidine-Coated Polyglactin 910 Sutures After Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-35
SponsorUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

About this trial

This study evaluates whether coating Polyglactin 910 sutures with chlorhexidine diacetate (CHX-DA) improves outcomes after the surgical removal of impacted mandibular (lower) third molars (wisdom teeth).

The study is a randomized, triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial. Eligible participants are patients aged 18 to 35 years who need extraction of two symmetrical impacted lower wisdom teeth of similar difficulty. For each participant, one extraction site is closed with standard Polyglactin 910 sutures and the other site is closed with chlorhexidine diacetate-coated Polyglactin 910 sutures, with the allocation assigned by random draw. Participants, the surgeon, and the outcome assessors are all blinded to which suture is used at each site.

The researchers compare the two suture types on the bacterial load at the surgical wound site and on soft tissue healing. Bacterial load is assessed from gingival crevicular fluid collected at the wound site next to the suture and quantified by viability real-time PCR (vPCR, copies/mL). Soft tissue healing is assessed using the IPR healing scale. Both outcomes are measured on days 3, 5, and 7 after surgery.

The aim is to determine whether the chlorhexidine-coated suture reduces bacterial load at the wound site and improves soft tissue healing compared with the uncoated suture.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged 18 to 35 years

Patients indicated for surgical removal of an impacted mandibular (lower) third molar

Patients with two symmetrical impacted mandibular third molars of the same difficulty level according to the Pell-Gregory classification, with a difference in the angulation of the tooth axis (Winter classification) between the two teeth not exceeding 15 degrees

Disqualifiers

Patients whose adjacent mandibular second molar is severely decayed/broken down, has only a residual root, or has been extracted

Patients using local or systemic antibiotics within 4 weeks before surgery

Patients using anti-inflammatory drugs or hormonal medications

Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Chlorhexidine Diacetate-Coated Polyglactin 910 Suture

    Device

    Polyglactin 910 absorbable suture coated with chlorhexidine diacetate, used to close one extraction site after impacted lower third molar surgery.

  • Uncoated Polyglactin 910 Suture

    Device

    Standard uncoated Polyglactin 910 absorbable suture, used to close the other extraction site after impacted lower third molar surgery.

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Chlorhexidine Diacetate-Coated Polyglactin 910 SutureExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Uncoated Polyglactin 910 SutureActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Bacterial Load at the Surgical Wound Site

Bacterial load measured from gingival crevicular fluid collected at the extraction wound site next to the suture using sterile autoclaved paper cones, quantified by viability real-time PCR (vPCR), reported in copies/mL.

Time frame
Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7
2

Soft Tissue Healing

Soft tissue healing at the extraction site assessed using the IPR (Index) healing scale.

Time frame
Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: