About this trial
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare electrocautery and scalpel blade incisions during surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. The study will evaluate postoperative pain, intraoperative blood loss, and wound healing in patients undergoing third molar surgery. A total of 78 participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a scalpel blade incision or an electrocautery incision under standardized surgical conditions.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Male and female patients.
Age 15 to 65 years.
Patients requiring surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. Patients classified as ASA I or ASA II.
Patients willing to provide written informed consent, or assent with parent/guardian permission where applicable, and attend scheduled follow-up visits
Disqualifiers
* Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease or immuno-compromised status.
Patients with bleeding disorders or those taking anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs that cannot be safely withheld according to physician advice.
Patients with pacemaker or implanted electrical cardiac device.
Pregnant or lactating patients.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
scalpel blade incision
Procedure/SurgeryA sterile No. 15 stainless-steel scalpel blade will be used to make the mucoperiosteal flap incision during surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar.
electrocautery incision
Procedure/SurgeryA fine electrocautery electrode in cutting mode at a standardized effective power setting will be used to make the mucoperiosteal flap incision during surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
postoperative pain
Postoperative pain at the surgical site will be assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain
Secondary outcomes
intraoperative blood loss
Total blood loss will be calculated as the increase in gauze weight plus the suction-canister volume after subtracting the recorded irrigation volume. Results will be reported in milliliters (mL).
wound healing
Wound healing will be assessed using the Landry Wound Healing Index, scored from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent).
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: