About this trial
The main objective of this study is to know if the application of both therapies, neuroscience pain education plus therapeutic exercise will modify pain, catastrophizing and quality of life in endometriosis.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult women (over 18 years of age) diagnosed with endometriosis.
Women with the capacity to carry out a therapeutic program based on muscular exercise.
Women with the capacity to understand the requirements of the study.
Disqualifiers
Women undergoing fertility and/or assisted reproduction treatment.
Pregnant women.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
PAIN NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION AND THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE PROGRAM
Procedure/SurgeryPAIN NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION 1\. Introduction to the knowledge of pain in the XXI century. Pain as an alarm system. Types of pain. Differences between acute and chronic pain. 3. Chronic pain. Concepts of kinesiophobia, catastrophism and fear avoidance, self-determination and neuroplasticity. 4\. Main pain management tools based on scientific evidence. 5. . Transtheoretical model of change. Adherence to treatment, importance as a determinant in health. 6\. Messages for home. Strategies of active coping in the maintenance stage. THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE PROGRAM 10-min warm-up. Joint mobility exercises with dual task or gamification. 30-min main part. Sequence of balance work between strength and body flexibility dosed according to the specific needs of each participant. 10-min cool down including breathing exercises and motor imagery. Home exercise program: walking (150 minutes in total, 3 days alternating with the face-to-face sessions).
USUAL CARE
Procedure/SurgeryThe treatment provided is mainly pharmacological, adjusted to the symptomatic profile of theses patients. Conventional medical care is based on hormonal, pharmacological and/or surgical treatment and is carried out on an individualized basis depending on the severity of the disease and the patient's needs, especially in matters of desire to become pregnant. Surgical treatment is carried out when pharmacological therapy (hormonal or anti-inflammatory) is ineffective or involves adverse events.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change from Self-report Pain magnitude
Magnitude of chronic pain: Chronic pain grading scale. Likert-type scale with 8 items that are evaluated between 0 and 10 for items 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8. Item 1 collects the number of days with pain in the last six months. Item 5 rates the impediment to the performance of usual tasks in the last three months, and can be evaluated between none and 90. The higher the score, the greater the chronic pain involvement. If the score is zero, the patient will be rated as having no pain. Chronic pain will be of low interference with grade I (low intensity) or grade II (high intensity) or of high interference with grade III (moderately limiting) or grade IV (severely limiting). Persistence will be graded as non-persistent or persistent pain.
Treatment Compliance
Self-report of the person responsible for managing attendance at the group sessions in the experimental group. Participants who attend 80% or more of the sessions will be considered compliant.
Treatment adherence (Maintenance of the therapeutic exercise program at home )
Adherence to treatment (experimental group), measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) included in the patient diary, in terms of: Maintenance of treatment at home: number of days that the proposed exercise is performed (100% being 2 times a week). Each patient will complete the VAS scale monthly. Participants with a score equal to or greater than 8 points out of 10 on the VAS scale will be considered to have high adherence.
Changes from Self-report pain catastrophizing
Catastrophizing thoughts in the face of pain: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Pain catastrophizing is a construct that is related to a negative and exaggerated orientation towards painful stimuli. The scale, validated in Spanish, is a list of 13 statements that describe different thoughts and feelings that may be related to pain in the dimensions of rumination, magnification and hopelessness. The person indicates the degree to which he/she has such thoughts or feelings by rating them between 0 (not at all) and 4 (all the time). The theoretical range of the instrument is between 13 and 62, with higher values indicating a higher index of catastrophizing.
Secondary outcomes
Exercise-related adverse events
Possible occurrence of pain, frequency of flares and fatigue, measured qualitatively in narrative text through patient diary.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.