Thoracoscopic Versus Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Enlarged Left Atrium

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorSamsung Medical Center

About this trial

This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing thoracoscopic surgical ablation with percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation as the first rhythm-control procedure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and an enlarged left atrium (LA diameter ≥50 mm or LA volume index ≥45 mL/m²).

A total of 194 patients who have never undergone an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation will be randomly assigned 1:1 to thoracoscopic ablation or percutaneous catheter ablation, stratified by duration of atrial fibrillation. The primary endpoint is recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) after a 3-month blanking period. The investigators hypothesize that thoracoscopic ablation will significantly reduce recurrence compared with catheter ablation in this population.

A secondary hypothesis is that 14-day patch monitoring detects recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia more sensitively than conventional 24-hour Holter monitoring.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 19 years or older

Persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy, or in whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy cannot be maintained

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom score ≥ 2

Considered suitable for rhythm-control therapy by either percutaneous catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation, at the investigator's medical discretion

Disqualifiers

Previous percutaneous catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation

Previous thoracic or cardiac surgery

Absolute contraindication to anticoagulation therapy

Life expectancy less than 1 year due to non-cardiac disease, or anticipated poor adherence to treatment, at the investigator's medical discretion

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Thoracoscopic ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Thoracoscopic surgical ablation is performed according to the standard technique. Pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage exclusion are mandatory. Additional lesions are at the operator's discretion.

  • Percutaneous catheter ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation is performed using radiofrequency, cryoballoon, or pulsed field energy. Pulmonary vein isolation is mandatory. Additional lesions are at the operator's discretion.

Treatment groups

194 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Thoracoscopic ablationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Percutaneous catheter ablationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia, defined as an episode documented on 12-lead ECG or sustained for at least 30 seconds on continuous monitoring (14-day patch monitor or 24-hour Holter). Recurrences during the 3-month blanking period are not counted as events.

Time frame
From 3 months after the index procedure until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient

Secondary outcomes

1

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation

Time frame
From 3 months after the index procedure until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient
2

Recurrence of atrial flutter

Time frame
From 3 months after the index procedure until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient
3

Recurrence of atrial tachycardia

Time frame
From 3 months after the index procedure until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient
4

All-cause death

Time frame
From 3 months after the index procedure until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.