ARDS

this study aims to assess the ability of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio to predict the development of Acute respiratory distress syndrome in traumatic brain injury patients.

This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study enrolls 6,000 adults with sepsis and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at multiple hospitals in China. Clinical data, treatment information, biological samples, and follow-up data are collected to characterize patient features and outcomes and to establish a multicenter clinical cohort and biobank. The study focuses on the clinical and biological heterogeneity of sepsis and ARDS. Longitudinal clinical data are integrated with information on organ function, inflammatory and immune responses, and multi-omics profiles to identify clinically relevant phenotypes and biological subgroups. Biomarkers associated with disease severity, organ dysfunction, treatment response, and mortality are explored, together with models for outcome prediction. Follow-up after hospitalization evaluates long-term survival and recovery, including pulmonary function, physical function, quality of life, and psychological health.

This prospective observational cohort study aims to investigate the relationship between mechanical power during the first 72 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation and 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit at Zagazig University Hospitals.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane, resulting in hypoxemia, decreased pulmonary compliance, and hemodynamic changes. Critical conditions (hypoxia; septic shock associated with ARDS) can alter blood viscosity. These changes in viscosity can affect blood flow and hemodynamics. There is only one clinical study that has measured one of the determinants of blood viscosity in ARDS (deformability), even though other parameters are involved in viscosity (elongation, deformability, hematocrit, etc.), and it is possible to measure blood viscosity comprehensively. To date, therefore, no study has evaluated the various parameters of blood viscosity in ARDS. The aim of this study is to investigate hyperviscosity in patients with ARDS and to assess whether this hyperviscosity correlates with respiratory or hemodynamic changes. The investigators will therefore compare blood viscosity and its determinants in patients admitted to the intensive care unit for ARDS and in patients admitted for other reasons (excluding ARDS or sepsis/septic shock). The investigators will also conduct a longitudinal assessment of changes in hemodynamic, respiratory, and viscosity parameters during ARDS

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using a monitor that measures muscle response can lower the amount of muscle relaxant medicine needed in adults who are treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) and need a continuous drip of a muscle relaxant called atracurium for more than 48 hours. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does using the monitor lower the infusion rate and total amount of atracurium given over 72 hours? Does using the monitor lower the complications related to atracurium use? Researchers will compare a group whose dose is guided by a muscle response monitor, aiming for a moderate level of muscle relaxation, to a group whose dose is guided by the usual bedside checks, to see if the monitor lowers the amount of medicine needed while keeping the same quality of care. Participants will: Receive atracurium as a continuous drip as part of their usual ICU treatment Have a small sensor placed on the wrist and hand to measure muscle response, if they are in the monitor group Be checked regularly by a nurse and a respiratory therapist, who will adjust the dose following a written plan Be observed closely for 72 hours, then followed until they leave the hospital .

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or one of the active treatments. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for all cohorts. Each specific cohort may have additional eligibility requirements, safety and efficacy procedures, or endpoints, which will be described in the corresponding intervention-specific records on clinicaltrials.gov listed below in the detailed description.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort A: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or vilobelimab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort A. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort B: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or paridiprubart. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort B. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort C: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or bevacizumab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort C. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

Serious acute heart and lung illnesses like heart failure, severe COVID, and sepsis often leave survivors struggling not only physically, but also with lasting depression, anxiety, and stress. These problems that are hard to treat because access to mental health care is often limited. To help address this, the researchers created Lift, a fully automated mindfulness program designed with patient input and delivered through a mobile app. The investigators now plan a large, multi-site study to test whether Lift improves mental health and quality of life over six months compared to a critical illness education program called Enlighten Recovery. Overall the goal is to make an easy-to-use, widely accessible program available to people across the U.S., including those who speak Spanish.

Previous clinical trials in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have demonstrated that ventilator management choices can improve Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality and shorten time on mechanical ventilation. This study seeks to scale an established Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool to facilitate dissemination and implementation of evidence-based research in mechanical ventilation of infants and children with pediatric ARDS (PARDS). This will be accomplished by using CDS tools developed and deployed in Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) which are based on the best available pediatric evidence, and are currently being used in an NHLBI funded single center randomized controlled trial (NCT03266016, PI: Khemani). Without CDS, there is significant variability in ventilator management of PARDS patients both between and within Pediatric ICUs (PICUs), but clinicians are willing to accept CDS recommendations. The CDS tool will be deployed in multiple PICUs, targeting enrollment of up to 180 children with PARDS. Study hypotheses: 1. The CDS tool in will be implementable in nearly all participating sites 2. There will be \> 80% compliance with CDS recommendations and 3. The investigators can implement automatic data capture and entry in many of the ICUs Once feasibility of this CDS tool is demonstrated, a multi-center validation study will be designed, which seeks to determine whether the CDS can result in a significant reduction in length of mechanical ventilation (LMV).

The goal of this randomized interventional clinical trial is to learn if a standardized lung volume optimization maneuver (LVOM) is beneficial in 1. study) children undergoing biventricular repair of their congenital heart disease (CHD) with cardiopulmonary bypass and 2. study) in children with severe respiratory failure at risk for or need for ECMO. The main questions it aims to answer are: Main hypotheses of CHD study: Does a standardized PEEP-Titration maneuver, to optimize end-expiratory lung volume improve: * cardiac performance * lung function Does it make a difference in: * length of ventilation * ventilation/perfusion mismatch of the lung * need for vasopressor support? Main hypotheses of ECMO study: Does a LVOM in children/infants with severe respiratory failure /ARDS * improve lung compliance and gas exchange * facilitate lung protective ventilation according to PALICC-2 guidelines * improve lung aeration and V/Q-matching assessed with EIT Does it make a difference in * need for ECMO * duration of ECMO runs * hemodynamics stability

Patients who are very ill either due to a severe infection, major organ injury, trauma or a major operation may require significant support with devices such as a dialysis machine for the kidneys or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) for the heart and lungs. This is often due to a reaction of the body to the insult which is termed inflammation. The investigators would like to assess if the use of a device that can remove the agents driving this reaction can lead to a quicker recovery form the illness. The device is a blood filter called HA380 and it would be connected to either the dialysis machine or the ECMO circuit. The investigators want to assess the feasibility of conducting a study with the HA380 column. We will also evaluate if the use of the HA380 column has an effect on the time spent on dialysis or ECMO, time spent on the breathing machine, time spent requiring drugs to support blood pressure and time spent in the intensive care unit.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) administration of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), ExoFlo, versus placebo for the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).

The goal of the observational APS phenotyping study is to better understand risk factors, potential biomarkers, length and severity of illness, and recovery for adults with ARDS, pneumonia, and/ or sepsis. This study will also generate a biobank of specimens collected from these patients that will be available to investigators for future studies of ARDS, sepsis, and/or pneumonia.

The management ARDS relies on ventilatory strategies aimed at limiting ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The setting of PEEP is still subject of debate, as randomized clinical trials comparing standardized higher versus lower PEEP strategies failed to demonstrate a clear survival advantage. Only few studies explored the hemodynamic effects of various PEEP levels depending on lung recruitability. Furthermore, the role of PEEP-mediated lung collapse and overdistention on patients' hemodynamics has yet to be elucidated. In this physiologic study, the association between EIT-measured lung collapse and overdistention and cardiac function will be explored, accounting for the individual potential for lung recruitment, partitioned respiratory mechanics and cardiac preload responsiveness. Three PEEP levels will be tested in a randomized, crossover fashion: PEEP corresponding to the crossing point between lung collapse and overdistention, PEEP associated with low lung collapse, PEEP associated with low lung overdistention.

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fostamatinib in hospitalized adult participants with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

This pilot study is aimed to compare and assess the impact, safety, and practical utility of gastric versus postpyloric feeding in moderate to severe ARDS patients with prone position ventilation. Patients included will be randomly assigned to receive enteral nutrition either through a nasogastric tube or a nasojejunal tube. The primary endpoint is the achievement of enteral nutrition goals. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of hospital-acquired infections, the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, 60-day mortality rates, the incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance, and the rate of enteral nutrition intake.

This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design assessing the efficacy of setting the ventilator based on measurements of respiratory mechanics (recruitability and effort) to reduce Day 60 mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The CAVIARDS study is also a basket trial; a basket trial design examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. CAVIARDS consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients). As per a typical basket trial design, the operational structure of both the COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-19) and non-COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-all) is shared (recruitment, procedures, data collection, analysis, management, etc.).

Noninvasive ventilation is commonly employed in patients with pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has been shown to reduce the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the rate of noninvasive ventilation failure remains substantial, at approximately 40%. Compared with patients in whom noninvasive ventilation succeeds, those who experience noninvasive ventilation failure have a higher likelihood of mortality during their intensive care unit or hospital stay. Therefore, improving the success rate of noninvasive ventilation is clinically important. In patients with lung consolidation receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can improve oxygenation. Noninvasive ventilation operates on similar physiological principles and can also deliver high PEEP via a mask interface. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence regarding the use of high PEEP during mask-delivered noninvasive ventilation. This study aimed to evaluate whether high PEEP can increase intubation-free survival in patients with pneumonia or ARDS who are treated with noninvasive ventilation.

This is an observational study performed by retrospective review of data routinely collected for patients receiving low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) therapy in intensive care units (ICUs). Our aim is to firstly, describe the local practice in terms of patient selection and technical details of clinical management related to the use of low-flow ECCO2R system, and secondly, the clinical results in terms of patient outcomes and adverse events. These findings may allow clinicians to improve the quality and safety of ECCO2R therapy provision in the ICU.

This observational study investigates the relationship between the duration of single-lung ventilation (SLV) and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) such as pneumonia, pneumothorax, hemothorax, acute lung injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery. A total of 134 patients aged 18-85 years, scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring SLV, will be monitored. Data including SLV duration, perioperative parameters, and postoperative pulmonary outcomes will be analyzed.

This study aim to compare the effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on ventilation/perfusion mismatch in two phenotypes of patients with moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), characterized by their respiratory system elastance (Ers). Ventilation/perfusion mismatch will be assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT).

Advanced stages of the response to life-threatening infection, severe trauma, or other physiological insults often lead to exhaustion of the homeostatic mechanisms that sustain normal blood pressure and oxygenation. These syndromic presentations often meet the diagnostic criteria of sepsis and/or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the two most common syndromes encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although critical illness syndromes, such as sepsis and ARDS, have separate clinical definitions, they often overlap clinically and share several common injury mechanisms. Moreover, there are no specific therapies for critically ill patients, and as a consequence, approximately 1 in 4 patients admitted to the ICU will not survive. The purpose of this observational study is to identify early patient biologic factors that are present at the time of ICU admission that will help diagnose critical illness syndromes earlier, identify who could benefit most from specific therapies, and enable the discovery of new treatments for syndromes such as sepsis and ARDS.

This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of AVM0703 administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion to patients with moderate or severe immediately life-threatening Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 or influenza (A or B). The study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single dose of AVM0703 in these ARDS patients.